ACTUAL SCIENTIST: "Climate Change is a Scam!"
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
So instead of simply pretending scientists don't know what they are doing, why don't you clearly state your views?
You're right; pressure to follow scientific method.
I don't trust ANY self supporting agenda,...
Some points.
-My take on this subject of peer review is,...-To have a magazine with individual anonymous reviewers decide what is acceptable,...without any unbiased oversight,...I have a problem.
-There has been a lot of inertial for decades now regarding man being the sole cause,...CO2,... of global warming/climate change.
-Thousands of "experts" incomes depend solely on man being responsible,...
-The UN is pushing this rationale for its own agenda,...which has NOTHING to do with the climate,...but only adds to the pressure to conform.
-To have a complete reversal,... say in the form of the actual cause being a sun cycle for example,... would be a disaster for 10's of thousands who depend on the "current" status.
-I know,...I'm saying I don't trust the current snow ball rolling down hill,...is a bit much to take,...hey,...that's MY opinion. ( it might actually melt 1st,...right
-Nobody here is in any position to actually debate the globes climate,...nobody.
-Sorry for rambling,...I'm short on time right now.
I'll give this a shot GPIDEAL,...I actually think you are mature enough to reply without the 1st word in your post being "you",...followed by a bunch of childish insults.
Some points.
-My take on this subject of peer review is,...-To have a magazine with individual anonymous reviewers decide what is acceptable,...without any unbiased oversight,...I have a problem.
-There has been a lot of inertial for decades now regarding man being the sole cause,...CO2,... of global warming/climate change.
-Thousands of "experts" incomes depend solely on man being responsible,...
-The UN is pushing this rationale for its own agenda,...which has NOTHING to do with the climate,...but only adds to the pressure to conform.
-To have a complete reversal,... say in the form of the actual cause being a sun cycle for example,... would be a disaster for 10's of thousands who depend on the "current" status.
-I know,...I'm saying I don't trust the current snow ball rolling down hill,...is a bit much to take,...hey,...that's MY opinion. ( it might actually melt 1st,...right
-Nobody here is in any position to actually debate the globes climate,...nobody.
-Sorry for rambling,...I'm short on time right now.
A peer reviewed journal is sort of like a scientific proof-reading. If someone's work doesn't stand up to scrutiny, he either goes back to the drawing board, or licks his wounds and carries on if he's confidant. He might not have majority support, but it might be enough to be published. Competing theories do exist. If his work is bullshit or very very bad, he will fail or will learn a valuable lesson.I'll give this a shot GPIDEAL,...I actually think you are mature enough to reply without the 1st word in your post being "you",...followed by a bunch of childish insults.
Some points.
-My take on this subject of peer review is,...-To have a magazine with individual anonymous reviewers decide what is acceptable,...without any unbiased oversight,...I have a problem.
-There has been a lot of inertial for decades now regarding man being the sole cause,...CO2,... of global warming/climate change.
-Thousands of "experts" incomes depend solely on man being responsible,...
-The UN is pushing this rationale for its own agenda,...which has NOTHING to do with the climate,...but only adds to the pressure to conform.
-To have a complete reversal,... say in the form of the actual cause being a sun cycle for example,... would be a disaster for 10's of thousands who depend on the "current" status.
-I know,...I'm saying I don't trust the current snow ball rolling down hill,...is a bit much to take,...hey,...that's MY opinion. ( it might actually melt 1st,...right
-Nobody here is in any position to actually debate the globes climate,...nobody.
-Sorry for rambling,...I'm short on time right now.
P.S. It's a good thing to have one's work vetted. It may actually garner more support, especially if it's based on a novel idea.
Again, you don't have a fucking CLUE what peer review is. You just don't. You think you do, so you post blithering nonsense like this, but you don't. You'rethe worst sorry sort of ignoramus: you blather away on subjects you know absolutely jack shit about.
Again, you don't have a fucking CLUE what peer review is. You just don't. You think you do, so you post blithering nonsense like this, but you don't. You'rethe worst sorry sort of ignoramus: you blather away on subjects you know absolutely jack shit about.
Careful there Fast!
When cornered and unable to provide a logical counter argument Fuji will, revert to reporting you to the mods
Words can not properly describe the contempt and lack of respect I have for Fuji
Whatever Fuji has replied with (I have him on ignore) is sure to be factually incorrect and of zero value
He lacks the intelligence to make logical arguments and when the heat gets turned up he tattle tales to the mods. Behaviour which is most often associated with teens under the age of 14.
He lacks the intelligence to make logical arguments and when the heat gets turned up he tattle tales to the mods. Behaviour which is most often associated with teens under the age of 14.
Nice try, liar. You have been running ever since that discussion about immunizing the Canadian dollar from oil price volatility by having BoC collect USD and pay CAD at a fixed rate. That can lead to BoC borrowing in CAD but it will never leaf to BoC borrowing in USD.
Yet you yammered on about the BoC having to borrow USD even though a child could see it's not possible. When your stupid claims were exposed as the utter bullshit they are you flipped into insult mode and got banned.
Since then you've just been posting insults.
The reality is you have a very tenuous grasp on finance and economics and you consistently lose any related debate. This is at odds with your desire to present yourself as a titan of industry.
You get enraged when rather than accept your complete bullshit on the authority of you claimed expertise people instead point out the significant logical problems and your overwhelming ignorance.
Just recounting history so everyone knows why you're so pissy.
Troll. Your post is childish. You don't understand peer review at all and now multiple people have called you on it.
I find these thread in which people try and refute what is settled science really quite hilarious. The argument ws over years ago. There may be some disagreement about how quickly the effects of climate change will be dealt and the severity but there is absolutely no doubt that man is contributing to global warming etc. NONE.
No Doubt The Fuji man has tried to discredit me.
This is laughable as he is the one who feels he could control the economy with precision using a dual currency Ponzi Scheme he cooked up. He is absolute that his plan would work despite it being explicitly forbidden under NAFTA and would be destroyed by the arbitrage players in currency markets.
He also insists on allowing China to expand its growing pollution while insisting the west must curb its emission.
Then there was his plan to have the government subsidize the production of welfare bastards by single mothers.
Finally he insists that his desire to secretly screw his best friend wife does not in any way reflect upon him as an honourable and trustworthy person.
With respect to this thread Fuji has taken an position that Climate Change is real and caused by man with 100% absolute certainty. Anyone who opposes his view is in his opinion an idiot.
While I have expressed the opinion that the scientific time line is far too short and the earths climate have always been changing well before man entered the equation.
However to ignore the possibility we may be damaging the planet would be a grave mistake.
A far more balanced and rational view.
Fuji is either a troll who likes to stir the pot until it gets too hot for him (when he tattle tales) or he is not whom he portrays himself to be.
I will let the other members here judge whos opinion is of value, however it should be crystal clear for all to see
This is laughable as he is the one who feels he could control the economy with precision using a dual currency Ponzi Scheme he cooked up. He is absolute that his plan would work despite it being explicitly forbidden under NAFTA and would be destroyed by the arbitrage players in currency markets.
He also insists on allowing China to expand its growing pollution while insisting the west must curb its emission.
Then there was his plan to have the government subsidize the production of welfare bastards by single mothers.
Finally he insists that his desire to secretly screw his best friend wife does not in any way reflect upon him as an honourable and trustworthy person.
With respect to this thread Fuji has taken an position that Climate Change is real and caused by man with 100% absolute certainty. Anyone who opposes his view is in his opinion an idiot.
While I have expressed the opinion that the scientific time line is far too short and the earths climate have always been changing well before man entered the equation.
However to ignore the possibility we may be damaging the planet would be a grave mistake.
A far more balanced and rational view.
Fuji is either a troll who likes to stir the pot until it gets too hot for him (when he tattle tales) or he is not whom he portrays himself to be.
I will let the other members here judge whos opinion is of value, however it should be crystal clear for all to see
Peer review in climate research:
"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
- Email from Phil Jones at the University of East Anglia to Michael Mann at Penn State University, July 8, 2004
“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”
- Phil Jones email to a number of people, March 11, 2003
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ear...nglia-emails-the-most-contentious-quotes.html
"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
- Email from Phil Jones at the University of East Anglia to Michael Mann at Penn State University, July 8, 2004
“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”
- Phil Jones email to a number of people, March 11, 2003
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ear...nglia-emails-the-most-contentious-quotes.html
Contrary to popular belief, it's not just people on the political right who are skeptical.
Prominent lefty Camille Paglia says man-made global warming is "a sentimental myth unsupported by evidence."
http://www.weeklystandard.com/camil...genderism-and-islamist-terror/article/2008464
Ouch.
Prominent lefty Camille Paglia says man-made global warming is "a sentimental myth unsupported by evidence."
http://www.weeklystandard.com/camil...genderism-and-islamist-terror/article/2008464
Ouch.
First I have to compliment you on your post,...being a definite cut above the 12 year olds troll post #187,...that was completely expected,...and apologies to 12 year olds.
Down to business,...I did not question once what a peer review is,..contrary to fuji's usual lies,...."reviewed by his peers",...says it all,...I don't need a lesson on what it is.
But you did not respond to my points as to why I don't trust the magazine,...if you disagree with my points,...fine,...but at least make a comment,...otherwise your post I quoted,...is non responsive.
Point,...Do you actually think that if a contrary theory regarding global warming/climate change is presented,... that completely shoots down EVERY article that magazine has ever published on the subject as complete rubbish and lies,...it would be passed by some anonymous reviewer that works for that magazine,...???
