La Villa Spa
Ashley Madison

Trump up 34% in early Florida voting

AK-47

Armed to the tits
Mar 6, 2009
6,697
1
0
In the 6
Mitt Romney was up only 3% on Absentee Ballots in Florida, Trump is up 34% on Clinton right now.
Its still early but thats very encouraging.

Video in link: https://t.co/LN8UUWoydW

Many people are saying the polls are either skewed or completely rigged.
Lets wait and see if thats true
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
78,525
96,902
113
34% would be a historic landslide of unprecedented proportions in any free election. I am skeptical.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,486
12
38
Mitt Romney was up only 3% on Absentee Ballots in Florida, Trump is 34% on Clinton right now.
Its still early but thats very encouraging.

Video in link: https://t.co/LN8UUWoydW

Many people are saying the polls are either skewed or completely rigged.
Lets wait and see if thats true
Yeah, it is Florida, home of hanging chads. To say nothing of 'results' being leaked almost a month before the Election. Very trustworthy. But remember AK, The Don did say this vote was gonna be rigged.
 

AK-47

Armed to the tits
Mar 6, 2009
6,697
1
0
In the 6
Yeah, it is Florida, home of hanging chads. To say nothing of 'results' being leaked almost a month before the Election. Very trustworthy. But remember AK, The Don did say this vote was gonna be rigged
Oh, so now you're insinuating Republicans are rigging the election??
 

AK-47

Armed to the tits
Mar 6, 2009
6,697
1
0
In the 6
34% would be a historic landslide of unprecedented proportions in any free election. I am skeptical
Not sure what you're skeptical of, the absentee ballots have all been counted so far, and Trump is up 34%.

Its only 500,000 votes counted so far however, and thats out of a possible 8 to 10 million votes still coming.
See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_in_Florida,_2012

So 34% lead from 500,000 is too small of a sample size, but it is encouraging
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Instead of following your dodgy Twitter link I searched news stories on Florida absentee ballots and found that end early results favor Clinton.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politi...rs-in-florida-appear-to-favor-clinton/2298297

I found no mention anywhere of any evidence of your claim in post 1 so I guess that is made up bullshit?

@“Many people are saying the polls are either skewed or completely rigged.”

I think only angry Trump supporters who aren't mature enough to admit their guy is unpopular.
 

AK-47

Armed to the tits
Mar 6, 2009
6,697
1
0
In the 6
Instead of following your dodgy Twitter link I searched news stories on Florida absentee ballots and found that end early results favor Clinton.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politi...rs-in-florida-appear-to-favor-clinton/2298297

I found no mention anywhere of any evidence of your claim in post 1 so I guess that is made up bullshit?
And this is why so many people think you're a giant dumb fuck, fuji. Your link was an article from 2 days ago when only 310,000 votes were counted, the video I linked was from today when 500,000 votes were counted.

Care to recant your stupid link?? I'm not holding my breath
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
And this is why so many people think you're a giant dumb fuck, fuji. Your link was an article from 2 days ago when only 310,000 votes were counted, the video I linked was from today when 500,000 votes were counted.

Care to recant your stupid link?? I'm not holding my breath
Do you have a credible link? Your link doesn't even work for me, it takes me to a page asking me to sign up for Twitter. And no random YouTube bullshit isn't credible if that is what you are linking.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,486
12
38
Oh, so now you're insinuating Republicans are rigging the election??
How is that different from what Trump's doing? Because he's saying it about Democrats? Who haven't had any power to rig anything in Florida elections since before BushII? And if the vote's rigged — as Trump claims — then a result supporting him is still a crooked result, and not to be trusted, no matter who did the rigging.

As for me, I call foul when so-called results are published weeks before Election Day. Supposedly these are mail-in votes and advance polls, but voting is still going on. They're spurious results being crowed over by spurious people — Twits, in fact — who demonstrably couldn't manage a fair count to save their lives. Fortunately none of them seems to have been entrusted with anything like such responsibility.

Glad you've found your flock.
------------
PS. If you actually follow facts: The ballots have not been counted yet, the numbers reported are registered Republican voters who have requested mail-ballots vs. registered Democrats who have, and there's some 50,000 or so undeclared who have asked for them as well.

In this election it's a huge and dangerous assumption to imagine that all Republicans will hold their nose and vote for Trump, just as it is to imagine all Democrats can stomach Hillary. We'll only know on Election Night, and I remember a Fla. Vote that came down to Supreme Court Judges looking at individual ballots, before anyone 'knew' anything. And that wasn't for days after the Day.

PPS: That time, the Republican squeaked in, according to the Republicans who counted and disallowed the ballots.

Tweet! Tweet!
 

AK-47

Armed to the tits
Mar 6, 2009
6,697
1
0
In the 6
Do you have a credible link? Your link doesn't even work for me, it takes me to a page asking me to sign up for Twitter. And no random YouTube bullshit isn't credible if that is what you are linking
No, do your own research. Not my fault you dont know how to open a simple twitter link.

The twitter link shows a Fox Business video which confirms the 34% lead.
Whats also interesting is that both anchors dont look too happy about Trump's lead
 

KBear

Supporting Member
Aug 17, 2001
4,169
1
38
west end
www.gtagirls.com
No, do your own research. Not my fault you dont know how to open a simple twitter link.

The twitter link shows a Fox Business video which confirms the 34% lead.
Whats also interesting is that both anchors dont look too happy about Trump's lead
Think the guy in the video said 34, as in 34 ballots, not 34%. If Romney was up 3% on 100s of thousands of ballots requested, that would be much more than 34 for Trump.

Early voting reveals warning signs for Trump
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/donald-trump-early-voting-clinton-229835
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
40,544
7,819
113
A Fox business link...really.

AK you should heed the words of Little John from Rocket Robin Hood: "Aw cmon brain, you've just got to work faster".

And it's not as if the GOP haven't rigged the vote before, remember 2000.
 

SuperCharge

Banned
Jun 11, 2011
2,523
1
0

AK-47

Armed to the tits
Mar 6, 2009
6,697
1
0
In the 6

AK-47

Armed to the tits
Mar 6, 2009
6,697
1
0
In the 6
A Fox business link...really.

AK you should heed the words of Little John from Rocket Robin Hood: "Aw cmon brain, you've just got to work faster".

And it's not as if the GOP haven't rigged the vote before, remember 2000
Fox Business is actually against Trump. Watch the reaction by the female anchor.

Most of the media is actually against Trump, except perhaps for O'Reilly and Hannity
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,395
11,536
113
Toronto
And this is why so many people think you're a giant dumb fuck, fuji. Your link was an article from 2 days ago when only 310,000 votes were counted, the video I linked was from today when 500,000 votes were counted.

Care to recant your stupid link?? I'm not holding my breath
Let's see. 34% lead for 500,00 votes is 335,00-165,000.

So even if they were tied at the 310,000 vote mark that is 155,000 each. That means in the next 190,000 Trump got 180,000 of them and Clinton got 10,000. I think I understand now.
 

AK-47

Armed to the tits
Mar 6, 2009
6,697
1
0
In the 6
Let's see. 34% lead for 500,00 votes is 335,00-165,000.

So even if they were tied at the 310,000 vote mark that is 155,000 each. That means in the next 190,000 Trump got 180,000 of them and Clinton lost 10,000. I think I understand now
I think the anchor made a mistake.

Either way Florida is gonna be very close, but 40,000 more absentee ballots for Trump is good news (unless of course you dont like him)
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,437
23,798
113
I think the anchor made a mistake.

Either way Florida is gonna be very close, but 40,000 more absentee ballots for Trump is good news (unless of course you dont like him)
Not really, Florida is supposed to have been a really easy win for him, now it could go either way.
 
Toronto Escorts