Trump up 34% in early Florida voting
- Thread starter AK-47
- Start date
I thought it was keen.Actually, you're criticism of the people around him was another moronic attempt to incorrectly paint the people of Toronto as classless.
Toronto is a city of LAW & ORDER, and that's why private citizens didn't upon themselves to apprehend the criminal like you suggested they should have. They're not the police.Actually my criticism of the people around him was in post 1 of that thread. Go look.
Not surprising since you're not a fan of law & order. You're the same person that approves of massive criminality like illegal immigration to the tune of 20+ million illegals. Then you call those who disapprove of such mega unprecendented levels of criminal behavior racists and xenophobes. Bizarre.
LOL @ Trump's campaign. The election isn't rigged, they're just incompetent.
:deadhorse: I just want this incessant and tedious campaigning to be OVER.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...trump-campaign-left-out-of-alaska-voter-guide
Trump campaign left out of Alaska voter guide
Alaskans won’t find any information about Donald Trump in their voter’s guide this year, after the GOP presidential nominee's campaign failed to submit biographical data and a candidate statement. The voter guide, which hit mailboxes this weekend, includes candidate statements from Democrats Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine, Green Party nominee Jill Stein and her running mate, Ajamu Baraka, the Constitution Party nominee and an independent candidate. But state elections officials say the Trump campaign and Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson did not submit materials ahead of an Aug. 30 deadline
:deadhorse: I just want this incessant and tedious campaigning to be OVER.
Love the Rocket Robinhood reference.A Fox business link...really.
AK you should heed the words of Little John from Rocket Robin Hood: "Aw cmon brain, you've just got to work faster".
Citizens arrests are law and order. Maybe you should learn something about the law before posting about it.Toronto is a city of LAW & ORDER, and that's why private citizens didn't upon themselves to apprehend the criminal like you suggested they should have. They're not the police.
Not surprising since you're not a fan of law & order. You're the same person that approves of massive criminality like illegal immigration to the tune of 20+ million illegals. Then you call those who disapprove of such mega unprecendented levels of criminal behavior racists and xenophobes. Bizarre.
If they didn't feel like doing that so least they could have snapped his photo with their phones.
Nope.
They did nothing. He just walked away.
I actually dont think Trump is gonna be able to win this election.I'd be tempted to offer to bet you over Trump's chances, since you are so confident.
But after moviefan weaselled out of the bet he lost, I'm not betting anyone else on terb
He's got 90% of the media against him, its a miracle he's even been able to keep up Hilllary.
Right now Trump is up in Florida however. 265,657 to 259,824 (or 5,833 votes).
https://countyballotfiles.elections...eports/AbsenteeEarlyVotingReports/PublicStats
I actually dont think Trump is gonna be able to win this election.
He's got 90% of the media against him, its a miracle he's even been able to keep up Hilllary.
Right now Trump is up in Florida however. 265,657 to 259,824 (or 5,833 votes).
https://countyballotfiles.elections...eports/AbsenteeEarlyVotingReports/PublicStats
Which makes you 100% more realistic then the orange guy.
CBC has a good article on how Trump leans on faulty polls, with details in why one is so wrong.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-uselection-polls-rigged-1.3808360
Trump does have an outside chance, but its against all odds IMO.Which makes you 100% more realistic then the orange guy
He has to win Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania. He might win Fla and Ohio, but Pa is out of reach.
So if he doesnt win Pa he has to win a large amount of the other smaller swing States like NC, Nevada, Iowa ....etc.
Its gonna be extremely tough.
I dont think he can do it, but the polls were wrong about Brexit and Justin Trudeau as well, so who knows
Citizen arrest lol. Not very bright to try that on a drunk idiot. The smart thing to do is exactly what they did. It's a public forum with tons of cameras in a stadium of thousands broadcast to millions. He wasn't getting away with it.Citizens arrests are law and order. Maybe you should learn something about the law before posting about it.
If they didn't feel like doing that so least they could have snapped his photo with their phones.
Nope.
They did nothing. He just walked away.
As usual, CBC makes the mistake of identifying a good point - that there are reasons why many polls are not reliable - and then fails to acknowledge that the problem affects polling relied upon by both sides. If Trump thinks he has polling that is infallible, he is surely wrong. However, if the Clinton camp thinks the NBC, Monmouth or other such polls are reliable, they're also kidding themselves.Which makes you 100% more realistic then the orange guy.
CBC has a good article on how Trump leans on faulty polls, with details in why one is so wrong.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-uselection-polls-rigged-1.3808360
People: a) have stopped answering polls, particularly when they are aware of the controversy surrounding the choices (and there is no question that supporting Trump is seen by the media as the more controversial choice, and b) no longer feel compelled to tell pollsters the truth. Gone are the days when people trusted strangers who call them on the phone.
Further, turnout is going to be a big part of this election, just as it was in Brexit. Yes, the Clinton camp has thrown a lot more money into its ground team, but the Trump supporters have been highly motivated by their perception of collusion between the Clinton campaign and the media, and were highly agitated with the course of government before Trump even ran. I would predict much higher turnout rates for Trump supporters as well as much higher rates of voter registration problems for Clinton supporters. Will it be enough to offset what most polls are saying? I think that's impossible to predict, just as it was for those following Brexit.
Polls have major issues, the advent of cells has killed the general premise and they are less reliable.As usual, CBC makes the mistake of identifying a good point - that there are reasons why many polls are not reliable - and then fails to acknowledge that the problem affects polling relied upon by both sides. If Trump thinks he has polling that is infallible, he is surely wrong. However, if the Clinton camp thinks the NBC, Monmouth or other such polls are reliable, they're also kidding themselves.
People: a) have stopped answering polls, particularly when they are aware of the controversy surrounding the choices (and there is no question that supporting Trump is seen by the media as the more controversial choice, and b) no longer feel compelled to tell pollsters the truth. Gone are the days when people trusted strangers who call them on the phone.
Further, turnout is going to be a big part of this election, just as it was in Brexit. Yes, the Clinton camp has thrown a lot more money into its ground team, but the Trump supporters have been highly motivated by their perception of collusion between the Clinton campaign and the media, and were highly agitated with the course of government before Trump even ran. I would predict much higher turnout rates for Trump supporters as well as much higher rates of voter registration problems for Clinton supporters. Will it be enough to offset what most polls are saying? I think that's impossible to predict, just as it was for those following Brexit.
I give you that much, which is why checking sites like 538 are worthwhile, as they look at all the polls and the trends and try to make sense of what's good info and what's noise.
Trump is just looking for self-confirmation and can't or won't do the due diligence to see what's crap or not.
Best article of the election so far?
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-fury-and-failure-of-donald-trump-w444943
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought polling was done by machine.People: a) have stopped answering polls, particularly when they are aware of the controversy surrounding the choices (and there is no question that supporting Trump is seen by the media as the more controversial choice, and b) no longer feel compelled to tell pollsters the truth. Gone are the days when people trusted strangers who call them on the phone
Vote for Clinton press 1.
Vote for Trump press 2.
Etc......etc.
Or is it still done by person to person??
Totally agree on this. Turnout is what might win him the electionFurther, turnout is going to be a big part of this election, just as it was in Brexit. Yes, the Clinton camp has thrown a lot more money into its ground team, but the Trump supporters have been highly motivated by their perception of collusion between the Clinton campaign and the media, and were highly agitated with the course of government before Trump even ran. I would predict much higher turnout rates for Trump supporters as well as much higher rates of voter registration problems for Clinton supporters. Will it be enough to offset what most polls are saying? I think that's impossible to predict, just as it was for those following Brexit
Fuji, this is just dumb. In a crowd situation like that getting involved in any altercation will result in everyone getting arrested and sort it out later situation. With a lot of he said he said.Citizens arrests are law and order. Maybe you should learn something about the law before posting about it.
If they didn't feel like doing that so least they could have snapped his photo with their phones.
Nope.
They did nothing. He just walked away.
And the good Samaritan ends up in lock up and misses the game. With no guarantee of being believed. That's the reality. The police don't want you to do it either. It's more likely to escalate the situation then solve it.
Sometimes I truly wonder where you get your ideas. But considering some of the things you say I think you really don't get out much.
Some are mechanical, some are not. Many people refuse to answer even mechanical polls. They don't trust how the information will be used (or they can't be bothered to spend the time answering the questions of a machine).Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought polling was done by machine.
Vote for Clinton press 1.
Vote for Trump press 2.
Etc......etc.
Or is it still done by person to person??
I think it is clearly a case of a vocal minority. It's the same thing we have here on TERB.Don't underestimate the Silent Majority.
Do you spin around until you're dizzy before you post here?I think it is clearly a case of a vocal minority. It's the same thing we have here on TERB.
You have NO reliable way of knowing whether: a) the majority of TERB POSTERS support Trump or Clinton, b) the majority of TERB MEMBERS (most of which read but never post) support Trump or Clinton, or c) which side of the poster debate is more "vocal" (post count, post length? - if it's post count, whichever side Fuji is on is ALWAYS the most vocal).
Put another way, your perception that your view is a majority view is a pure guess, not a verifiable reality. The fact that it seems to be important to you to hold a majority view might be something that's holding you back from serious consideration of alternative views.
And you have better information?Do you spin around until you're dizzy before you post here?
You have NO reliable way of knowing whether: a) the majority of TERB POSTERS support Trump or Clinton, b) the majority of TERB MEMBERS (most of which read but never post) support Trump or Clinton, or c) which side of the poster debate is more "vocal" (post count, post length? - if it's post count, whichever side Fuji is on is ALWAYS the most vocal).
Put another way, your perception that your view is a majority view is a pure guess, not a verifiable reality. The fact that it seems to be important to you to hold a majority view might be something that's holding you back from serious consideration of alternative views.
I'm not the one claiming who is the majority, or who is more vocal (although I should really claim the Fuji side is more vocal, because the evidence is overwhelming).And you have better information?
I honestly believe that it is impossible to determine the majority view at this point in this election, and that people who claim to be able to do that are campaigning, not opining.
