If it involves millions of Palestinians flooding into Israeli territory to eliminate the Jewish majority and turn it ultimately into an Islamic State --Kinda funny how many people said this sort of deal would never have any credible platform. :
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35428457
now its getting talked about more and more.
That's promising.Kinda funny how many people said this sort of deal would never have any credible platform. :
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35428457
now its getting talked about more and more.
In other words, it's two-states in disguise.Kinda funny how many people said this sort of deal would never have any credible platform. :
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35428457
now its getting talked about more and more.
More like one country with two provinces/states.In other words, it's two-states in disguise.
It could be a way forward. The devil is in the details as usual.More like one country with two provinces/states.
True, and with 50 years of violence neither side trust each other at all.It could be a way forward. The devil is in the details as usual.
A workable solution will most likely involve 2 entities, assuming a breakthrough over the right of return issue. Personally I doubt the Palestinian diaspora would even return to the West Bank or Gaza, unless pushed or forced to, anymore than the Armenian diaspora would choose to go live in Armenia.True, and with 50 years of violence neither side trust each other at all.
Still, the polls show that its only the very old who still support the two state solution, both there, here and on this board.
One detail that matters is whether millions of hostile Palestinians would flood into Israel and then vote to abolish the Jewish state and replace it with an Islamic one.It could be a way forward. The devil is in the details as usual.
Why would they be hostile? Would be an upgrade from refugee camps.One detail that matters is whether millions of hostile Palestinians would flood into Israel and then vote to abolish the Jewish state and replace it with an Islamic one.
The other detail is whether Hamas would be disarmed.
The Palestinians have been trying to destroy Israel since they started the 1947 civil war, rejecting partition. They're hostile. It's not a matter of would be, is a matter of have been, for the last seventy years. A sizeable fraction want an Islamic state, purged of Jews and/or with only a token, subservient Jewish population.Why would they be hostile? Would be an upgrade from refugee camps.
You mean back to the two state solution?A workable solution will most likely involve 2 entities, assuming a breakthrough over the right of return issue. Personally I doubt the Palestinian diaspora would even return to the West Bank or Gaza, unless pushed or forced to, anymore than the Armenian diaspora would choose to go live in Armenia.
I'm with fuji on this one, do you really even have to ask this question? It would be ethnic suicide of Jews.Why would they be hostile? Would be an upgrade from refugee camps.
What I meant was 2 political entities, whether they'd be called states or provinces or cantons remains to be sorted out.You mean back to the two state solution?
Jewish Republic, pick one.....I'm with fuji on this one, do you really even have to ask this question? It would be ethnic suicide of Jews.
It won't unless people decide to stop listening to fear mongers like you and Netahyahoooo. The fact is, one state or eventual oblivion, that is the choice Israel has. It is the choice they have ALWAYS faced and never made the right decision. Integration or oblivion.If it involves millions of Palestinians flooding into Israeli territory to eliminate the Jewish majority and turn it ultimately into an Islamic State --
Won't happen.
Ahh siding with racial purity are we? Who else sort that? hmmmm They are all sons of Abraham or Ibrahim.I'm with fuji on this one, do you really even have to ask this question? It would be ethnic suicide of Jews.
I think the single homeland federal solution is a good one with closer ties over the next 100 years or so.What I meant was 2 political entities, whether they'd be called states or provinces or cantons remains to be sorted out.
A one state solution is ideal, but won't happen anytime soon, at least not in this generation and not before the surrounding neighborhood itself is stable imo.
Of course, but compensation security etc would be much more manageable. Just like the South was re-integrated after the civil war.It could be a way forward. The devil is in the details as usual.
