CBC report - Most Canadians don't think humans are the main cause of climate change

[Moviefan-2]

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

2015's global temperature anomaly came out as 0.87ºC.

Frankfooter says 0.74 + 0.15 = 0.83.

I have never said any such thing, its yet another weasel move, an out and out direct lie.

Come on moviefan, is 0.87 higher then 0.83?

LMFAO! :biggrin1:

No math is needed, you can keep your broken abacus out of this.

 

[Frankfooter]

In May, 2014, we bet whether or not the IPCC projection of 0.2ºC was accurate, from 1995-2015, based on the reported 1995 global temperature anomaly of 0.43ºC.
We bet whether 2015 would hit 0.83ºC.
2015's global temperature anomaly came out as 0.87ºC.
You lost.

Therefore, the bet is from 1995 to 2015 -- you won't have to wait, as we'll know the winner by early 2016.

Do we have a bet?

So in order to win the bet, all the temperature has to do is hit 0.83ºC anomaly for the year of 2015, correct?

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

NASA reported:
- 2015 anomaly: 0.87ºC

You lost the bet.

 

[Moviefan-2]

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

2015's global temperature anomaly came out as 0.87ºC.

Frankfooter says 0.74 + 0.15 = 0.83.

I have never said any such thing, its yet another weasel move, an out and out direct lie.

Come on moviefan, is 0.87 higher then 0.83?

LMFAO! :biggrin1:

No math is needed, you can keep your broken abacus out of this.

 

[Frankfooter]

Still won't admit 0.87ºC is higher the 0.83ºC?
Weasels will be weasels and deniers will continue to deny.

You made a bet, you lost, and now you're a weasel who won't honour his word.

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

 

[Moviefan-2]

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

2015's global temperature anomaly came out as 0.87ºC.

Frankfooter says 0.74 + 0.15 = 0.83.

I have never said any such thing, its yet another weasel move, an out and out direct lie.

Still won't admit 0.87ºC is higher the 0.83ºC?

LMFAO! :biggrin1:

No math is needed, you can keep your broken abacus out of this.

 

[Frankfooter]

The fact that it was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet had nothing to do with the bet. The terms of the bet were clear, they were based on the global anomaly hitting 0.83ºC, not 0.83ºC + 'whatever it takes to make moviefan win'.

You agreed to continue the bet on its original terms, not to change the terms to your 'adjusted' numbers.

LMFAO! :biggrin1:

Therefore, the bet is from 1995 to 2015 -- you won't have to wait, as we'll know the winner by early 2016.

Do we have a bet?

You and I are in total agreement, the bet was between the years 1995-2015, and any data from 2014 is totally irrelevant.
Glad we cleared that up.


You lost, weasel.
Such a sore loser, so sad for you.

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

NASA reported:
- 2015 anomaly: 0.87ºC

 

[Moviefan-2]

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

2015's global temperature anomaly came out as 0.87ºC.

Frankfooter says 0.74 + 0.15 = 0.83.

I have never said any such thing, its yet another weasel move, an out and out direct lie.

Still won't admit 0.87ºC is higher the 0.83ºC?

LMFAO! :biggrin1:

No math is needed, you can keep your broken abacus out of this.

 

[Frankfooter]

LMFAO! :biggrin1:

Hey loser, did you hear what about February's global temperature is?

1.35ºC

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

You're still a loser weasel.

 

[Moviefan-2]

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

2015's global temperature anomaly came out as 0.87ºC.

Frankfooter says 0.74 + 0.15 = 0.83.

I have never said any such thing, its yet another weasel move, an out and out direct lie.

Still won't admit 0.87ºC is higher the 0.83ºC?

LMFAO! :biggrin1:

No math is needed, you can keep your broken abacus out of this.

 

[Frankfooter]

The fact that it was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet had nothing to do with the bet. The terms of the bet were clear, they were based on the global anomaly hitting 0.83ºC, not 0.83ºC + 'whatever it takes to make moviefan win'.

You agreed to continue the bet on its original terms, not to change the terms to your 'adjusted' numbers.

LMFAO! :biggrin1:

Therefore, the bet is from 1995 to 2015 -- you won't have to wait, as we'll know the winner by early 2016.

Do we have a bet?

You and I are in total agreement, the bet was between the years 1995-2015, and any data from 2014 is totally irrelevant.
Glad we cleared that up.


You lost, weasel.
Such a sore loser, so sad for you.

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

NASA reported:
- 2015 anomaly: 0.87ºC

And February 2016 NASA reported the global anomaly as 1.35ºC.

 

[Moviefan-2]

If you want to refer to the bet, use the actual bet.

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

Globally-averaged temperatures in 2015 shattered the previous mark set in 2014 by 0.23 degrees Fahrenheit (0.13 Celsius).

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...-shattering-global-warm-temperatures-in-2015/

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

The Six attempts at 'Moving the Goal Posts'

That's not NASA.

...now you're faking charts.

Yet another lie from you, claiming that's chart we bet on.

Are you expecting me to try to figure out your faulty weasel math?
Screw you, I'm not going down that rabbit hole.

....any data from 2014 is totally irrelevant.

Now you're down to copying and pasting random ... quotes as if they had some kind of point to them.

:thumb:

It takes a certain kind of person to post something that shows himself to be a lying fool.

 

[Frankfooter]

If you want to refer to the bet, use the actual bet.

:thumb:

A typical bullshit post from moviefan.
You quote me saying 'use the bet if you want to refer to the bet' and then you include a series of partial quotes, none of which were from the bet.
Typical moviefan bullshit.

In May, 2014, we bet whether or not the IPCC projection of 0.2ºC was accurate, from 1995-2015, based on the reported 1995 global temperature anomaly of 0.43ºC.
We bet whether 2015 would hit 0.83ºC.
2015's global temperature anomaly came out as 0.87ºC.
You lost.

Therefore, the bet is from 1995 to 2015 -- you won't have to wait, as we'll know the winner by early 2016.

Do we have a bet?

So in order to win the bet, all the temperature has to do is hit 0.83ºC anomaly for the year of 2015, correct?

This is the post where you made the bet you refuse to honour.

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

NASA reported:
- 2015 anomaly: 0.87ºC

February 2016's global anomaly is now 1.35ºC, beating the bet by a whopping 0.5ºC.
You lost the bet, weasel

 

[Frankfooter]

February 2016.

 

[Moviefan-2]

If you want to refer to the bet, use the actual bet.

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

Globally-averaged temperatures in 2015 shattered the previous mark set in 2014 by 0.23 degrees Fahrenheit (0.13 Celsius).

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...-shattering-global-warm-temperatures-in-2015/

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

The Six attempts at 'Moving the Goal Posts'

That's not NASA.

...now you're faking charts.

Yet another lie from you, claiming that's chart we bet on.

....any data from 2014 is totally irrelevant.

A typical bullshit post from moviefan.

Now you're down to copying and pasting random ... quotes as if they had some kind of point to them.

:thumb:

It takes a certain kind of person to post something that shows himself to be a lying fool.

 

[AK-47]

I give both you guys big props for stamina, thats for sure

 

[Moviefan-2]

I give both you guys big props for stamina, thats for sure

If we can keep Frankfooter's fairy-tale claims contained within a single thread, it's a victory for the TERB membership at large. :thumb:

 

[Frankfooter]

If we can keep Frankfooter's fairy-tale claims contained within a single thread, it's a victory for the TERB membership at large. :thumb:

Funny that you call it a fairy-tale, weasel.
Because according to the terms you set and the reports you posted here, you lost.
The only fantasy is your denier fantasy.

You set the bet target number and the website:

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

And you reported that the numbers show you lost:

NASA reported:
- 2015 anomaly: 0.87ºC

The only fantasy is your continual denier fantasy.
Its a symptom of your syndrome.

 

[Moviefan-2]

You set the bet target number and the website:

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

Globally-averaged temperatures in 2015 shattered the previous mark set in 2014 by 0.23 degrees Fahrenheit (0.13 Celsius).

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...-shattering-global-warm-temperatures-in-2015/

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

The Six attempts at 'Moving the Goal Posts'

That's not NASA.

...now you're faking charts.

Yet another lie from you, claiming that's chart we bet on.

....any data from 2014 is totally irrelevant.

A typical bullshit post from moviefan.

Now you're down to copying and pasting random ... quotes as if they had some kind of point to them.

:thumb:

It takes a certain kind of person to post something that shows himself to be a lying fool.

 

[Frankfooter]

The fact that it was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet had nothing to do with the bet.

LMFAO! :biggrin1:

Therefore, the bet is from 1995 to 2015 -- you won't have to wait, as we'll know the winner by early 2016.

Do we have a bet?

You and I are in total agreement, the bet was between the years 1995-2015, and any data from 2014 is totally irrelevant.
Glad we cleared that up.


You lost, weasel.
Such a sore loser, so sad for you.

You picked the number and the web page for the bet:

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

You posted the results that show you lost:

NASA reported:
- 2015 anomaly: 0.87ºC

And February 2016 NASA reported the global anomaly as 1.35ºC, a full 0.5º over the bet.

Only your Dunning Kruger effect keeps you from admitting the obvious, that you lost.

 

[Moviefan-2]

You set the bet target number and the website:

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

Globally-averaged temperatures in 2015 shattered the previous mark set in 2014 by 0.23 degrees Fahrenheit (0.13 Celsius).

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...-shattering-global-warm-temperatures-in-2015/

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

The Six attempts at 'Moving the Goal Posts'

That's not NASA.

...now you're faking charts.

Yet another lie from you, claiming that's chart we bet on.

....any data from 2014 is totally irrelevant.

A typical bullshit post from moviefan.

Now you're down to copying and pasting random ... quotes as if they had some kind of point to them.

:thumb:

It takes a certain kind of person to post something that shows himself to be a lying fool.