NASA said:
http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
The Six attempts at 'Moving the Goal Posts'
:thumb:
CBC report - Most Canadians don't think humans are the main cause of climate change
- Thread starter Moviefan-2
- Start date
http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
The Six attempts at 'Moving the Goal Posts'
:thumb:
There you go again spamming away with the nonsense random misquotes, as if they actually meant something.
Its bad enough you still haven't admitted that 0.87ºC is higher then the 0.83ºC we bet on and that you therefore lost the bet, but continuing this nonsense misquote business is just lame.
You tried to cheat the bet 7 times already, just give it up and admit you lost.
Just because you were caught out lying on this thread doesn't mean you have to go all whiny and start spamming this thread as well.
NASA said:
http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
The Six attempts at 'Moving the Goal Posts'
:thumb:
Another spam post of random misquotes and not a single word in his defence of why he thinks 0.87ºC didn't beat the 0.83ºC we bet on.
Even when he posts the NASA page that announced the anomaly was 0.87ºC he doesn't admit he lost.
My, what a sore loser.
Even when he posts the NASA page that announced the anomaly was 0.87ºC he doesn't admit he lost.
My, what a sore loser.
NASA said:
http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
The Six attempts at 'Moving the Goal Posts'
:thumb:
Any of that spam include a reason why you think 0.87ºC isn't higher then 0.83ºC?
Or are you just going to keep spamming every thread instead of defending yourself.
And yes, you are a sore loser, aren't you?
Or are you just going to keep spamming every thread instead of defending yourself.
And yes, you are a sore loser, aren't you?
Okay, but what if the global temperature only went up by 0.05 Celsius??
Which in your case says exactly that!!
You really think this is statistically significant??
Many scientists might argue its not!
I also try to avoid reading the moviefan spam, so boring and idiotic, but he did quote NASA as saying:
Talk to spamhead, according to him it was the largest year over year increase ever reported.
The global temperature only went up in 2014 by 0.23 degrees Celsius.
Sorry Franky, that is not even CLOSE to being statistically significant!
Having said that, we need to get off oil and gasoline fumes!!
I''m with the global warming crowd on this one!!
Sorry Franky, that is not even CLOSE to being statistically significant!
Having said that, we need to get off oil and gasoline fumes!!
I''m with the global warming crowd on this one!!
It was 0.13ºC, not 0.23ºC, but its still the largest year over year change recorded according to NOAA and the second largest according to NASA.
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201513
You should brush up on your statistics.
For instance, the chance that the last 15 of 16 warmest years have happened since 2000 has been found to be 0.01%.
http://www.theguardian.com/environm...possible-without-manmade-climate-change-study
That, my friend, is statistics.
Last edited:
Anyone else find it amusing that movie once again posts sources that refute his claims. Sure looks like the temperatures have continued rising.
...
I find it particularly entertaining since the big number in the corner, 0.87ºC, shows he lost the bet.
The graph shows an increase in global temperature with no sign of a 'pause' or a 'hiatus' with the giant red dot at the far right showing how fast the increase has been the last couple of years.
Also notable is the quote under the bet losing number:
http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
Click over to the 'evidence' page at NASA, from moviefan's source and it really contradicts absolutely everything he says
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
It takes a certain kind of person to post something that shows himself to be a lying fool.
And he's a sore loser.
NASA said:
http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
The Six attempts at 'Moving the Goal Posts'
:thumb:
More of the same spam by the sore loser, moviefan.
Three partial quotes and then infers that they were a single statement, its such a pathetic and sad attempt at cheating.
The first quote went like this:
For reference, this was the bet:
Moviefan's second and third quotes had nothing to do with the bet, they are just random out of context quotes.
As moviefan shows in his spam attack, NASA posted the 2015 anomaly as 0.87ºC.
Moviefan proves he lost the bet with the spam yet keeps spamming away as if he didn't.
Such a poor loser.
NASA said:
http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
The Six attempts at 'Moving the Goal Posts'
:thumb:
????
According to NASA:
- 1997 anomaly - 0.47ºC
- 1998 anomaly - 0.63ºC
Difference: 0.16ºC.
http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
So, now we have Frankfooter arguing that 0.13 is a bigger number than 0.16. :biggrin1:
This one's going to be added to the next update of Frankfooter's greatest hits.
Au contraire.
You've forgotten that the "adjustments" in the NASA graph have been refuted by your so-called "scientific community."
The current graph that maps temperature anomalies against the predictions confirms that temperatures in the 21st century have been stagnant. Certainly, we can all agree that the anomalies are well below what the IPCC predicted.
Page 225: http://www.nature.com/articles/ncli...trZLMnaUyec=&tracking_referrer=www.nature.com
Post corrected, but I would fully expect you to misquote it over and over again. You do only like misquotes and partial quotes these days, don't you?
This is the image you keep posting over and over again.
The one that shows you lost the bet, showing the temp was 0.87ºC beating the 0.83ºC we bet on.
It also shows there was no pause and no 'hiatus'.
This is your own image, from your own photobucket account, that you keep posting that shows you to be a liar.
