According to science, NO.
You don't have to delve into anything for too long, it's only ten seconds for you to understand the science behind the "free fall" collapse of the 2 tall towers and the shorter 3rd one.
Just watch from 0:14 to 0:24 it's that simple and fast.
Well this is where science questions how it's NOT possible for the two planes to bring down the buildings the way they did.
Therefore, something else was needed to bring them down the way they did.
Ok experts can anyone explain this ? If you look closely at the original footage, you'll see it.
Gee, why not look at the video ?I'd really love to know how he could debunk the free fall of building 7. Which is the key here.
OMG - Are you shitting me ????? It is obvious you didn't look at the video I offered you instead choosing to get some obscure crap from from an unknown source that even makes more outlandish claims. First as witnessed by millions around the world and by my own friends WHO WERE THERE - a passenger airliner flew into the second tower. Second how do you know that this evidence video hasn't been altered for the gullible more interested in grasping straws than reality ?Ok experts can anyone explain this ? If you look closely at the original footage, you'll see it.
No steel structure on the planet has ever collapsed because of fire, and then to show it collapse in this fashion is even less believable .Gee, why not look at the video ?
Footage that kills the conspiracy theories: Unseen 9/11 footage shows WTC Building 7 consumed by fire
Sorry but this video was originally shown by one of the networks all all over the world, and they all show the left wing going behind the distant building in the background.OMG - Are you shitting me ????? It is obvious you didn't look at the video I offered you instead choosing to get some obscure crap from from an unknown source that even makes more outlandish claims. First as witnessed by millions around the world and by my own friends WHO WERE THERE - a passenger airliner flew into the second tower. Second how do you know that this evidence video hasn't been altered for the gullible more interested in grasping straws than reality ?
Oh, there are steel several buildings partially destroyed by falling debris and set ablaze that have the same unique architecture as WTC ??? No ?? This same argument is used for the WTC 1 & 2 towers which play down that their examples were not suspended floors nor were they subjected to airplane strikes. Sheesh .. take a deep breath and figure out the level of complexity, the absolute insane amount of cover-up, the unprecedented level of the flight targeting, air traffic controllers, passenger phone calls (made from hijacked planes), etc, etc, etc, .... it is an absolutely staggering leap of logic to grasp the most insane wacked out theories and give not even a slight fraction of the thought to who, what, when, how and why this could be carried out in downtown Manhattan instead of a much less witnessed event location at a less bust time of day.No steel structure on the planet has ever collapsed because of fire, and then to show it collapse in this fashion is even less believable .
Gee, why not look at the video ?
Bonus:
Footage that kills the conspiracy theories: Unseen 9/11 footage shows WTC Building 7 consumed by fire
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html#ixzz3YAVrn2Qb
OMG - Are you shitting me ????? It is obvious you didn't look at the video I offered you instead choosing to get some obscure crap from from an unknown source that even makes more outlandish claims. First as witnessed by millions around the world and by my own friends WHO WERE THERE - a passenger airliner flew into the second tower. Second how do you know that this evidence video hasn't been altered for the gullible more interested in grasping straws than reality ?
Do your self a favour and actually look at the videos I have shown. I looked at yours and found really stupid statements from one of the 'experts'.
Yes, that video shot could be fudged too.Oh, there are steel several buildings partially destroyed by falling debris and set ablaze that have the same unique architecture as WTC ??? No ?? This same argument is used for the WTC 1 & 2 towers which play down that their examples were not suspended floors nor were they subjected to airplane strikes. Sheesh .. take a deep breath and figure out the level of complexity, the absolute insane amount of cover-up, the unprecedented level of the flight targeting, air traffic controllers, passenger phone calls (made from hijacked planes), etc, etc, etc, .... it is an absolutely staggering leap of logic to grasp the most insane wacked out theories and give not even a slight fraction of the thought to who, what, when, how and why this could be carried out in downtown Manhattan instead of a much less witnessed event location at a less bust time of day.
I thought little green men in Area 51 took a little leap in faith but this ... wow ... it's more like a religion based on faith than obviously listening to logic.
BTW: Forgetting the phone calls from the plane just before the crash describing the descent, about 100 cameras were known to record the event. Interesting that you offer up the same (probably fudged) video shot from yet another conspiracy source.
This video was apparently leaked out by a whistleblower.
There have also been reconstructions based on the damage to lamp posts and the like which could only have been caused by a plane.I've reviewed this theory before. There are witnesses who said that they actually saw the plane fly towards the Pentagon. Wasn't there an engine rotor or wheel lying outside? If it was a cruise missile, what happened to the real plane and passengers? Not that the plane involved was a smaller one than the others, IIRC.
Not true. In 2007 in Oakland, a steel bridge collapsed as a result of a tanker fire. The structure failed due to extreme temperature caused by burning of almost 9000 gallons of fuel.No steel structure on the planet has ever collapsed because of fire, and then to show it collapse in this fashion is even less believable .
Sorry but this video was originally shown by one of the networks all all over the world, and they all show the left wing going behind the distant building in the background.
Here's another unrelated video go to time line 01:00 and you'll see the exact same thing.
None of whom have any expertise in this kind of building and that is what, one twentieth of one one hundredth of one percent of the US population? That is not a lot of non experts.Oh Yea, Well here are 1500 Architects and Engineers who have joined to get to the bottom of this.
We are supposed to believe that there are thousands and thousands of Americans in on a conspiracy to kill 1500 innocent people and not one single person among those thousands of conspiracy plotters has come forward to tell his story.Yes, that video shot could be fudged too.
I remember the famous, first home videos of the two planes crashing into the buildings which were unequivocal, and you can hear the crowds on the street too.
We are supposed to believe that there are thousands and thousands of Americans in on a conspiracy to kill 1500 innocent people and not one single person among those thousands of conspiracy plotters has come forward to tell his story.
The government isn't that good at keeping secrets.
Yes there were clapping explosions with windows popping out of the building, listen to one person who who was near the building when it collapsed. Time Line 21:15Excellent. There was no explosion sounds is a dead give-away. Also, quite a complex process of ultimate destruction. Thank you.
On the contrary my friend, there were people who saw but MORE importantly, heard explosions.Excellent. There was no explosion sounds is a dead give-away. Also, quite a complex process of ultimate destruction. Thank you.
