Asian Sexy Babe

Bibi Wins, Two State Solution Dies?

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
This is an argument that proves that Israel isn't a democracy because the jewish settlers living in west bank can vote but palestinians living there cannot.
They are not in the same area. Arabs and Jews alike inside the wall vote. The areas inside the wall is defacto annexed by Israel, whether you think that annexation is legal or not, it is a different area then the territory outside the wall.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
It's under Israeli control. A military occupation is temporary but when it becomes permanent, the territory becomes part of Israel
There is nothing in international law that places any time limit on an occupation.

especially when the leader of the governement declares that he won't allow to end the occupation.
He has not said that, you are lying.

Also under international laws a military occupier isn't allowed to settle civilian population, so clearly it isn't just a military occupation but everything Israel is doing there is to make this territory part of Israel.
That applies only to the land inside the security wall, not to area A or area B.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,256
23,711
113
Yes, that the lands continue to be occupied lands.

The key point here -- the one that GoWest was trying to avoid -- is that the Palestinians themselves don't accept the premise that the lands are part of the state of Israel.

Furthermore, Israel hasn't done anything to suggest the lands are part of the state of Israel. As GoWest points out, the Palestinians in the area can't vote in Israel's national elections.

The assertion that the lands are part of the state of Israel is completely baseless. Neither the Israelis nor the Palestinians -- nor the UN or anyone else, for that matter -- believes that is the case.

That argument doesn't hold water when you look at the 'facts on the ground' as Netanyahu calls them.
Israel has settled the occupied lands and will never leave.

They have effectively ended the two state solution and Netanyahu's election promise only confirms what his actions spoke against what he said in polite society.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
That argument doesn't hold water when you look at the 'facts on the ground' as Netanyahu calls them.
Israel has settled the occupied lands and will never leave.

They have effectively ended the two state solution and Netanyahu's election promise only confirms what his actions spoke against what he said in polite society.
No, area A isn't settled.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
That's only 18% of Palestine.
You just confirmed that Israel and Netanyahu have effectively killed the two state solution.
In fact the security wall encloses less than ten percent of the west bank. The size of area A within the remaining 90% of the territory changes and is determined by the success of the Palestinians in establishing law and order. As confidence builds that are given more.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,256
23,711
113
In fact the security wall encloses less than ten percent of the west bank. The size of area A within the remaining 90% of the territory changes and is determined by the success of the Palestinians in establishing law and order. As confidence builds that are given more.
But as you said, only 18% hasn't been settled and claimed by Israel.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Yes but not the case when it becomes permanent, a military occupation by definition is temporary.
No one has said it is permanent except you. You have tried lying about what Netanyahu said, but the fact is even he wants to set it become an independent state one day.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
No, you said only Area A hasn't been settled.
That's 18% of Palestine.

Good luck with that two state solution you think might happen.
God you are seriously mentally disabled, and you are a mindless troll if you think playing word games with me counts as debating.

I said there were no settlements in area A. I said nothing about area B having them or not having them and I sure as hell didn't say area A was the only territory without them.

It is a fact, whether you like it or not, and no matter how many pathetic clown games you play, that only 9.4% of the West Bank hs been enclosed by the security wall. The other 90.6% is available for a Palestinian state, although only Area A has so far been delegated to the PA.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,235
6,944
113
1- Jordan and Egypt don't want those territories, why do you think that Israel is able to force them to take territories they don't want.
The Palestinians clearly don't want to be Israeli. Why do you think you are able to force them to join a state they don't want to be in?

I do agree that Jordan doesn't want the West Bank any more. Ever since Black September and Jordan's war against the PLO they have no interest (besides that Jordan's rulers don't want more people opposed to their rule). The peace treaty between Israel and Jordan ceded responsibility for it to Israel to be held until a Palestinian state is negotiated.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,235
6,944
113
This is an argument that proves that Israel isn't a democracy because the jewish settlers living in west bank can vote but palestinians living there cannot.
Similar to south african apartheid where Blacks weren't allowed to vote
Back to that shit again? Many countries allow absentee ballot for citizens. I believe Italy even has members of parliaments elected to represent absentees. Settlers can vote because they are Israeli citizens, not because of where they live.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,235
6,944
113
That argument doesn't hold water when you look at the 'facts on the ground' as Netanyahu calls them.
Israel has settled the occupied lands and will never leave.
....
I agree. Israel has never given up land in exchange for peace (or in the case of Gaza the hope for peace).

Oh wait. That's the opposite of reality.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,235
6,944
113
...
They have effectively ended the two state solution and Netanyahu's election promise only confirms what his actions spoke against what he said in polite society.
And your comment on Hamas' impact on any peace deal? Oh wait, that would distract from your ranting.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,256
23,711
113
God you are seriously mentally disabled, and you are a mindless troll if you think playing word games with me counts as debating.

I said there were no settlements in area A. I said nothing about area B having them or not having them and I sure as hell didn't say area A was the only territory without them.

It is a fact, whether you like it or not, and no matter how many pathetic clown games you play, that only 9.4% of the West Bank hs been enclosed by the security wall. The other 90.6% is available for a Palestinian state, although only Area A has so far been delegated to the PA.
Are you now claiming that there are no settlements in areas B and C, or are you sticking with your original claim that only Area A has no settlements?
You really are ridiculous.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Are you now claiming that there are no settlements in areas B and C, or are you sticking with your original claim that only Area A has no settlements?
You really are ridiculous.
I'm telling you that the security wall, enclosing the only area you could possibly claim has been defacto annexed, encloses less than ten percent of the west bank.

Area A and area B both have no settlements and the wall containing the settlements encloses only one sixth of area C.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts