So how much was the cost the Waterloo regional case? How much was the cost of the Picton case?Ok, you're right. I guess I should have said, "You don't expect him to give you an answer based on reality, do you?".
Where exactly did I say the what the cost of the Forcillo case was, especially since the case hasn't finished? You may have a Magic 8 Ball, but I sure don't. Still haven't come up with the cost of a murder trial in Canada, have you? With no facts to the contrary, who knows, I could be right.How much was the cost of the Forcillo case? Oh, you don't know. Then, it's a little premature to say that the cost is $2.5 million, don'tcha think?
Why is everyone pissing on blackrock13? He really isn't the complete wanker people take him for. A guess of $2.5M as the ballpark for a murder trial is perfectly reasonable.So you have no faith in our legal system? Sure lets just waste $2.5 million dollar for a show.
That would be "cue", not "queue". Maybe he is t.c.w.p.t.h.f, after all.They'll surface soon enough, queue Nuttyboi.
So you have no faith in our legal system? Sure lets just waste $2.5 million dollar for a show.
All fine a good, except that it will be a jury, members of the public, that decides his guilt or innocence, not the police.Just to put the flaming fun aside for the moment…
Yes, for a show. It is always politics. The money never concerns them that much , it is the public perception. Look at the gas plant scandal of the Liberals, a billion thrown away on a show for the public to save two political seats. Feds cancelling helicopter contracts and costing billions - just for perception. The list can go on and on.
In this case, the public outrage was unbearable for the police and their puppet masters. Why? The video of the event going viral. Everyone who has seen it shakes their head when they hear six shots followed by a pause then three more. Then more disbelief when they learn he, SY, only had a pocket knife and was alone on the streetcar.
It is the perception of the gross over-kill that had the public upset. The police, SIU, prosecutors, and politicians had no choice, they had to calm the masses with a show. Absolutely anything else would cause the public to loose faith in the legal system.
How will it end? We'll see. If he gets anything less than a guilty verdict , the perception will be he got away with it because he was a cop and they played nice with him.
It was an estimate, and educated guess. So what's your estimate of the cost of a murder trial in Canada?So, what were you talking about when you made this comment?
.
2nd degree murder is the correct charge.Of course the show needs to go on. If they really wanted to convict him, the judge would say the 2nd degree would not stand at this point and the crown would have been FORCED to change the charge to Criminal Negligence or Manslaughter. Those are 2 charges on which there is actually a risk of conviction. 2nd degree, zero risk of conviction. Guaranteed walk.
Correct, and I never said the police decide his guilt. They just have to present evidence against one of their own (no potential bias there…). The jury must make their decision upon the evidence presented to them as they are not permitted to base their decisions on anything else (or so the story goes).All fine a good, except that it will be a jury, members of the public, that decides his guilt or innocence, not the police.
Turn around and you'll see that i's not a back pedal at all, just an attempt to dummy down so you'd understand, but I failed obviously.Umm, backpedal much?
You seem to reflect many of my own thoughts. I don't trust the cops, crown attorneys, etc. whatsoever when it comes to them looking after the "brotherhood". When it comes to day to day stuff, whatever, they do a good job.Correct, and I never said the police decide his guilt. They just have to present evidence against one of their own (no potential bias there…). The jury must make their decision upon the evidence presented to them as they are not permitted to base their decisions on anything else (or so the story goes).
Last time I looked, the prosecutors and police work very close together, they are the ying and yang of the crown. On the other side, the accused and his defence lawyers. It is clear who the defence lawyers will support. Question for me is, how vigorously will the prosecution go after one of their own? They could aways intentionally poorly present their case leaving the jury little choice in how to decide (with endless appeals should the jury go against the grain). Is there really such a thing as zero bias in this situation? TANJ
I'm trying to decide whether such people's attitudes are stupider than your urge to taunt and provoke them.Where are all the people saying cops are above the law, judges and lawyers always side with them and no one will ever go to trial for anything?
Just to put the flaming fun aside for the moment…
Yes, for a show. It is always politics. The money never concerns them that much , it is the public perception. Look at the gas plant scandal of the Liberals, a billion thrown away on a show for the public to save two political seats. Feds cancelling helicopter contracts and costing billions - just for perception. The list can go on and on.
In this case, the public outrage was unbearable for the police and their puppet masters. Why? The video of the event going viral. Everyone who has seen it shakes their head when they hear six shots followed by a pause then three more. Then more disbelief when they learn he, SY, only had a pocket knife and was alone on the streetcar.
It is the perception of the gross over-kill that had the public upset. The police, SIU, prosecutors, and politicians had no choice, they had to calm the masses with a show. Absolutely anything else would cause the public to loose faith in the legal system.
How will it end? We'll see. If he gets anything less than a guilty verdict , the perception will be he got away with it because he was a cop and they played nice with him.
So who are 'they' exactly who 'played nice'? As for the ying and yang and the intentional tanking by the crown bits, I'll let the real police and real lawyers on TERB clarify that one.Correct, and I never said the police decide his guilt. They just have to present evidence against one of their own (no potential bias there…). The jury must make their decision upon the evidence presented to them as they are not permitted to base their decisions on anything else (or so the story goes).
Last time I looked, the prosecutors and police work very close together, they are the ying and yang of the crown. On the other side, the accused and his defence lawyers. It is clear who the defence lawyers will support. Question for me is, how vigorously will the prosecution go after one of their own? They could aways intentionally poorly present their case leaving the jury little choice in how to decide (with endless appeals should the jury go against the grain). Is there really such a thing as zero bias in this situation? TANJ
I was thinking of the entire legal system a whole.So who are 'they' exactly who 'played nice'?
Big brother if you will.The police, SIU, prosecutors, and politicians had no choice, they had to calm the masses with a show. Absolutely anything else would cause the public to loose faith in the legal system.
I told you where the number came from and it certainly wasn't out of my ass, but the discussions were before your time on TERB. Then I even offered a second source. Remember the mention of the recent Waterloo Regional murder case. Where exactly did I deny giving the number? You must be able to quote it as it only happened today.Sure, first you pull a number out of your ass, then you deny giving such number, and finally you admit to giving that number, saying all along it was an "estimate". Classic backpedal.
So as I originally said, no faith in the legal system? The judge crown and police are in on the fix.I was thinking of the entire legal system a whole.
Big brother if you will.
Sure, first you pull a number out of your ass, then you deny giving such number, and finally you admit to giving that number, saying all along it was an "estimate". Classic backpedal.