You are acting like you are the only person who has any valid opinion on this stuff. We are all equal here, and respected on the basis of our written statements. Society is actually largely behind us, according to polls and studies. The government will try to crack down hard, but will probably fail. If we (lawyers, academics, citizens) don't argue about technicalities, there is no way to fight this at all.
stop trying to get around the new law
- Thread starter George The Curious
- Start date
Be my guest man. If you and your lawyer strikes down the new bill, we will frame your name ontop of this website.
I thought you were against trying to get around the law. Now you are inviting people to do just that. George the Incoherent.
Thomas Jefferson would disagree: "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so."
As would Martin Luther King, from the Birmingham Jail:
""There are just laws and there are unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that an unjust law is no law at all... One who breaks an unjust law must do it openly, lovingly...I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the very highest respect for law."
Yeah, this is a real issue. Seeing an escort isn't all about multiple positions, 7 SOGs, etc. The services rendered are different for each person. The law can't account for that...
Stephen Harper is paying Peter MacKay to fuck Canada up the ass, that's got to be illegal!I'm paying my ex $xxxxx amount for spousal support. Once in a while is sleep with her. Will this be consider paying for sex
Exactly. What if I hire a girl to masturbate in front of me for my pleasure (no intercourse) and I jerk off to that is that a sexual service? I'm I a criminal for that?
I agree it's more about politics than legal or academic thing. Germany legalized prostitution because of very liberal political environment. people are against right wing or conservatives of any shape and form (from the bad memories of Nazi), and prostitution legalization was just a by-product. In Canada, conservatives won because voters only cared about economic performance, and now this new prostittuion law is the by-product.
Even though the government seems to want to wipe out the sex industry like no other country ever has, I think they will have to define sexual service
in the final bill. As it presently stands legitimate medical and therapeutic massage could be called into question.
If they monitor this stuff, they should really consider leaving the present licensed massage industry pretty much alone and just go after hardcore incall
and outcall. Otherwise they will find themselves with an unmanageable legal nightmare when it comes to massage. The present massage industry is licensed
and seems pretty clean and the legal limits are basically adhered to by the MPA's. What's a little kissing and a HJ among friends.
Ottawa needs to come back down to earth and realize this isn't life or death, just a little fun in an otherwise tough world. Relax, smile a little up there.
in the final bill. As it presently stands legitimate medical and therapeutic massage could be called into question.
If they monitor this stuff, they should really consider leaving the present licensed massage industry pretty much alone and just go after hardcore incall
and outcall. Otherwise they will find themselves with an unmanageable legal nightmare when it comes to massage. The present massage industry is licensed
and seems pretty clean and the legal limits are basically adhered to by the MPA's. What's a little kissing and a HJ among friends.
Ottawa needs to come back down to earth and realize this isn't life or death, just a little fun in an otherwise tough world. Relax, smile a little up there.
Umm, no. Laws are open to interpretation. That is precisely why we have lawyers and a legal profession, otherwise there would be nothing to debate.
