The science behind the behaviour of greenhouse gases is extremely solid.
Nonsense. The computer models made predictions on how they thought it should work but the predictions were spectacularly wrong. The opposite of "solid," in fact.
Indeed, if you were to look at the changes in the Earth's temperature over the past 100 years, you would find there's nothing "rapid" occurring at all. My strong suspicion is that you've never actually looked at the numbers (why bother, when you can just keep quoting the false propaganda numbers about the "consensus.")
You keep claiming the scientists support your assertions, but that's not necessarily true. To prove my point, I'll acquiesce and examine the NOAA statement that you have repeatedly insisted you want me to comment on.
Here's the NOAA analysis for April 2014 that you referenced earlier in this thread:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/04
When you initially posted it, you made the following comment: "What happened to that 'pause'?" (post #28).
You followed up in post #54 by saying it was evidence of the "CONTINUATION" of global warming -- ie, that the pause had ended or perhaps never existed (emphasis in caps added by you).
However, the NOAA did not say the pause has ended. Neither has NASA, the Met Office, the IPCC or anyone else.
The pause is accepted science that is recognized throughout the world. Even the New York Times admits it (and that the climate researchers have been unable to explain what is happening):
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/11/science/earth/what-to-make-of-a-climate-change-plateau.html?_r=0
Your assertion that the pause has ended was completely baseless and at odds with accepted science throughout the world. It was an unacceptable extrapolation from the NOAA release and was ultimately based on nothing more than your imagination.
Some "evidence" that is.
---
As for scientists who support the view that nothing unusual has occurred in the Earth's temperature and that they are not convinced that greenhouse gases are causing warming, you should look into the controversy the American Physical Society ran into after it issued its 2007 statement (now under review) that asserted that global warming is happening.
That led to some high-profile resignations, including the resignation of a Nobel Prize winner in physics. Forbes has reported that, in 2009, some 80 prominent scientists, researchers and environmental business leaders asked the APS to change its policy statement.
Their open letter included the following point: "measured or reconstructed temperature records indicate that 20th [and] 21st century changes
are neither exceptional or persistent, and the historical and geological records show many periods warmer than today" (bolded emphasis added by me).
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2012/07/17/that-scientific-global-warming-consensus-not/
My view, as you like to refer to it, is commonly held by many experts, including Nobel Prize-winning scientists. And those are scientists who are genuine recipients of the Nobel Prize, not fake "Nobel laureates" like Michael Mann.