About as many times as you simply supply a thread link with 1300+ posts, not what was asked for and nothing else.
Damn climate change!
- Thread starter Insidious Von
- Start date
Congrats, that makes you 2 for 2.
Twice you`ve supplied links that prove you don`t know what you are talking about, can`t understand the arguments, repeat debunked claims and don`t read what you use for links
First time was the NYT article that clearly contradicted your claims, and which you still don`t understand.
Second time was pointing to the thread in which every argument you brought out was destroyed by credible science.
Way to go!
Do you genuinely believe that is what I am saying?
All you are doing is proving your scientific illiteracy since you don't know that everything in science is a theory.
To answer the question precisely: No, I find it impossible to think you actually believe what your posts keep implying. That's the point.
You are walking proof of the failures of science education in Canada. Did you know that ignoring evidence doesn't make it go away?
Do you mean like when you posted a NYT article that you claimed proved that the pause was accepted science only to have to be shown that the article called it a 'claim' based on cherry picked El Nino dates?
