The One Spa

NDP dirty

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,936
9
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Horse shit. It is zero zip nada. The press is now dropping it since Mulcair beat the shit out of his critics.
So we won't be seeing any more stories about this, as the details of the fishy things these people were tasked with start leaking out?
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
11,397
3,748
113
Putting house paid staff in a political office is certainly unethical. They were caught trying to use public money for their own benefit.

Dirty.
Harper uses the phony "Action Plan" ads ( publicy funded) as advertising for his Conservative government. If Mulcair is dirty, Harper is 100% excrement.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
31,248
13,174
113
Room 112
I love how you lefties are spinning this. Do you really think that the parliamentary staff paid for by taxpayers and working at these satellite offices (paid by NDP Party) were doing parliamentary work on behalf of constituents?

Mulcair is a fucking asswipe. He mocked the committee from the get go. No fucking respect for parliamentary procedure or taxpayers.
 

groggy

Banned
Mar 21, 2011
15,252
1
0
I love how you lefties are spinning this. Do you really think that the parliamentary staff paid for by taxpayers and working at these satellite offices (paid by NDP Party) were doing parliamentary work on behalf of constituents?

Mulcair is a fucking asswipe. He mocked the committee from the get go. No fucking respect for parliamentary procedure or taxpayers.
No, the one with the lack of respect is Harper, from his fights with the courts to his trying to game the system with his electoral bill.
 

Lovehobby

Banned
Sep 25, 2013
5,806
0
0
I love how you lefties are spinning this. Do you really think that the parliamentary staff paid for by taxpayers and working at these satellite offices (paid by NDP Party) were doing parliamentary work on behalf of constituents?

Mulcair is a fucking asswipe. He mocked the committee from the get go. No fucking respect for parliamentary procedure or taxpayers.
Tax paid assistants for ALL parties blur the lines on admin vs partisan work. NDP kept parliament informed every step of the way. Nothing done was against the rules. The rules were changed retroactively. The NDP complied. Where is the story?

Zzzzzzzzzzz
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,936
9
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Tax paid assistants for ALL parties blur the lines on admin vs partisan work. NDP kept parliament informed every step of the way. Nothing done was against the rules. The rules were changed retroactively. The NDP complied. Where is the story?

Zzzzzzzzzzz
The story is where they took tax money from Canadians and plowed it into their own political campaign. They went full hog to the trough.

Whether they get off on a technicality or whether they get charged, either way, it is dirtier than a stripper the night before rent is due.
 

Lovehobby

Banned
Sep 25, 2013
5,806
0
0
Where is the story now? No legs. Gone. No there there.
 

Moviefan-2

Court Jester
Oct 17, 2011
10,485
172
63

Lovehobby

Banned
Sep 25, 2013
5,806
0
0

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,460
12
38
The loint is the NDP did not BREAK any rules.
Rules can't ever cover all ethical questions. All parties get tax money and pay for staff and offices with it. But apparently only the NDP thought to put those offices outside Ottawa, and nearer the MPs and constituents who'd use them.

Once the smoke clears we'll see whether the ethics get newly-regulated to permit all parties to regionalize, or whether so much fuss has been made that they wouldn't dare. Given that pols are involved my money's on having it both ways: censuring the NDP for not asking, then letting everyone do likewise.
 

Lovehobby

Banned
Sep 25, 2013
5,806
0
0
They did NOTHING illegal and kept parliament in the loop all along.

Where is story now? Ooooops gone.

Feeling a little stupid?
 

Lovehobby

Banned
Sep 25, 2013
5,806
0
0

groggy

Banned
Mar 21, 2011
15,252
1
0
But only the NDP used the loophole to go full hog to the trough and divert public money to their own use.
maybe you should use all caps and then call him a moron.

By the way, have you ever heard of his new term, telecommunications?
People don't physically have to be in the same office all the time now, don't you know.
 

elmo

Registered User
Oct 23, 2002
4,719
5
0
here and there
maybe you should use all caps and then call him a moron.

By the way, have you ever heard of his new term, telecommunications?
People don't physically have to be in the same office all the time now, don't you know.
I believe the term you are referring to is "telecommuting"...
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,936
9
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
maybe you should use all caps and then call him a moron.
Why? He hasn't denied that the NDP found a loophole to divert public money to their own use. He is saying that since they found a loophole they didn't break any actual laws, which may be true. They found a way to go whole hog to the trough without actually breaking the law, they were caught, and the loophole they were exploiting has now been closed.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts