Who Are The Pedophiles?

buttercup

Active member
Feb 28, 2005
2,571
11
38
Lemme know how you would feel if god forbid one of your children were involved. Then get back to me.
Since you ask, even if the perpetrator was never found and punished, I still would not want to set hundreds of perverts on fire, whose only crime (so far as we know) is possession of (looking at) child porn pictures.

Lemme ask you a question, in return. If god forbid one of your children were injured or killed in a car accident, would you want to set fire to all the people who were ticketed for speeding in school zones? You probably don't agree, but I regard it that a person speeding through a school-zone has far more potential to harm children than a person looking at child porn pics. Same with someone selling cigs to children.

It seems the majority view, here, is that possessors of child porn are hugely more deserving of the most vicious and savage punishments that sick minds can imagine, than school-zone-speeders or kid-cig-sellers. But the fact that lotsa people agree with you does not make you right.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,776
0
0
Note that cartoons, drawings etc, that do not use real children, are classed the same as photos of actual children.
I thought so. A while back, one of our members posted a cartoon of a kid. I warned him it could be construed as child porn and he immediately deleted it.
 

demien2k5

Banned
Aug 3, 2006
3,658
0
0
On the Edge
Since you ask, even if the perpetrator was never found and punished, I still would not want to set hundreds of perverts on fire, whose only crime (so far as we know) is possession of (looking at) child porn pictures.

Lemme ask you a question, in return. If god forbid one of your children were injured or killed in a car accident, would you want to set fire to all the people who were ticketed for speeding in school zones? You probably don't agree, but I regard it that a person speeding through a school-zone has far more potential to harm children than a person looking at child porn pics. Same with someone selling cigs to children.

It seems the majority view, here, is that possessors of child porn are hugely more deserving of the most vicious and savage punishments that sick minds can imagine, than school-zone-speeders or kid-cig-sellers. But the fact that lotsa people agree with you does not make you right.
Your argument is like saying its perfectly ok to be a trafficker of illicit drugs, as long as you are not doing drugs yourself, because, you know, that'd be bad.
 

MIRAGE

mirage-entertainment.cc
Supporting Member
Jun 4, 2007
8,348
1,167
113
60
Toronto, ON
www.mirageladies.com
Since you ask, even if the perpetrator was never found and punished, I still would not want to set hundreds of perverts on fire, whose only crime (so far as we know) is possession of (looking at) child porn pictures.

Lemme ask you a question, in return. If god forbid one of your children were injured or killed in a car accident, would you want to set fire to all the people who were ticketed for speeding in school zones? You probably don't agree, but I regard it that a person speeding through a school-zone has far more potential to harm children than a person looking at child porn pics. Same with someone selling cigs to children.

It seems the majority view, here, is that possessors of child porn are hugely more deserving of the most vicious and savage punishments that sick minds can imagine, than school-zone-speeders or kid-cig-sellers. But the fact that lotsa people agree with you does not make you right.
Never said i was right. Just merely stating my views and opinions. Some might agree, others ?, not so much. But i still hold the OPINION that if someone is found guilty with indisputable proof ( DNA, Video, Blah ,Blah) of having sex with children they should be given the fucking chair. Maybe this might be food for thought to others that are considering it. Long, Long time believer of an eye for an eye. Penalties in this country are WAYYYYY to soft for some of the worst crimes.

One of the greatest film clips that i have ever seen was when this father of a child that was raped and murdered was hiding in a telephone booth near a courthouse where the guy that was convicted of the crime was being escorted away by the cops. The father ran out of the booth, pulled out a gun, and blew the fuckers head off. then he calmly put the gun down and surrendered. i will probably get flamed for this, but it was one of the most satisfying things i have ever seen.

Andy
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
Never said i was right. Just merely stating my views and opinions. Some might agree, others ?, not so much. But i still hold the OPINION that if someone is found guilty with indisputable proof ( DNA, Video, Blah ,Blah) of having sex with children they should be given the fucking chair. Maybe this might be food for thought to others that are considering it. Long, Long time believer of an eye for an eye. Penalties in this country are WAYYYYY to soft for some of the worst crimes.

Andy
Many behind bars have been put there on indisputable proof, fingerprints, eyewitness statements and video, but have later been found innocent. Eye for an eye use to have thieves have their hand cut off and has found to bee wanting in many ways.
 

MIRAGE

mirage-entertainment.cc
Supporting Member
Jun 4, 2007
8,348
1,167
113
60
Toronto, ON
www.mirageladies.com
Many behind bars have been put there on indisputable proof, fingerprints, eyewitness statements and video, but have later been found innocent. Eye for an eye use to have thieves have their hand cut off and has found to bee wanting in many ways.
How do you dispute someones sperm inside the orafus of a child or a videotape of him raping a child ?


One of the greatest film clips that i have ever seen was when this father of a child that was raped and murdered was hiding in a telephone booth near a courthouse where the guy that was convicted ( he plead GUILTY) of the crime was being escorted away by the cops. The father ran out of the booth, pulled out a gun, and blew the fuckers head off. then he calmly put the gun down and surrendered. i will probably get flamed for this, but it was one of the most satisfying things i have ever seen. Even more so, i can just imagine the fathers satisfaction.

Andy
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
How do you dispute someones sperm inside the orafus of a child or a videotape of him raping a child ?


One of the greatest film clips that i have ever seen was when this father of a child that wasraped and murdered was hiding in a telephone booth near a courthouse where the guy that was convicted ( he plead GUILTY) of the crime was being escorted away by the cops. The father ran out of the booth, pulled out a gun, and blew the fuckers head off. then he calmly put the gun down and surrendered. i will probably get flamed for this, but it was one of the most satisfying things i have ever seen. Even more so, i can just imagine the fathers satisfaction.

Andy
Simple, that's not what you said. You said simply there was DNA evidence, not where or how.

Consider yourself flamed. Okay, he pleaded guilty and probably was, but when you kill him, you end his misery forever, probably that's something he wanted. Let him spend some time in jail and have his neighbours and bunkies make his life a living hell.
 
Last edited:

mur11

New member
Dec 31, 2003
1,160
2
0
Since you ask, even if the perpetrator was never found and punished, I still would not want to set hundreds of perverts on fire, whose only crime (so far as we know) is possession of (looking at) child porn pictures.

Lemme ask you a question, in return. If god forbid one of your children were injured or killed in a car accident, would you want to set fire to all the people who were ticketed for speeding in school zones? You probably don't agree, but I regard it that a person speeding through a school-zone has far more potential to harm children than a person looking at child porn pics. Same with someone selling cigs to children.

It seems the majority view, here, is that possessors of child porn are hugely more deserving of the most vicious and savage punishments that sick minds can imagine, than school-zone-speeders or kid-cig-sellers. But the fact that lotsa people agree with you does not make you right.
The thing that you either don`t understand, or won`t understand is that users of child pornography directly influence the demand for child pornography. By creating the demand, they are, in essence, directly contributing to that child being taken advantage of.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,765
4,848
113
But I don't regard mere possession of child porn as such a major crime that it warrants setting fire to the perverts accused of it. If the perverts can find solace in viewing pics, and they never do any harm to any child, why do we need to get our knickers so twisted about that?
Because a child had to have been abused on camera for that kiddie porn to exist in the first place, smartypants.

Oh, and you should be banned and your IP# reported to the cops

I regard the difference between possessing child porn and molesting a child, as, more or less, the same as the difference between possessing "normal" porn and committing "normal" rape
Holy shit, you're a sick puppy.

Where is the NSA when you really need them??!!
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
Because a child had to have been abused on camera for that kiddie porn to exist in the first place, smartypants.

Oh, and you should be banned and your IP# reported to the cops


Holy shit, you're a sick puppy.

Where is the NSA when you really need them??!!
Too bad we couldn't easily see what BC's thoughts were when Cycleguy posted his pictures and got sent to banned camp.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
If the perverts can find solace in viewing pics, and they never do any harm to any child, why do we need to get our knickers so twisted about that?

There is no comparison between mere possession of a large collection of pics, and causing actual harm to an actual child. Of course, anyone who actually does harm to a child, they must pay for that. But if we are going to set fire to someone, let that someone be someone who has committed very real harm to a real child.

I regard the difference between possessing child porn and molesting a child, as, more or less, the same as the difference between possessing "normal" porn and committing "normal" rape. The one is perfectly harmless, while the other is a huge criminal offence carrying very harsh penalties.
You are sick.

It would certainly have been possible for you to object to vigilante justice without in any way defending child pornography, its consumers, and by extension its distributors and its producers.

But you didn't go for that argument. You tried to argue that child pornography is no worse than regular pornography. You did that in part with a specious claim that real pornography always and only depicts raping women, and thus is no worse than pornographic images of children being raped.

What is obviously missing from your soul is the understanding that sex between men and women is supposed to be consensual, and that there are lots of women who consent to making porn, and to engaging in the real sex acts depicted in mainstream porn.

No child ever consented to have sex on film for child pornography. No child can consent to that, child pornography always and only depicts non consensual sex.

(Let's leave aside teenagers sexting pictures to their boyfriends, an admittedly troubling grey area. Consent is not possible in examples of young children being molested by adults on camera.)

Child pornography is associated with a greater probability of child abuse. Regular porn is associated with a greater probability of having consensual sex. Child pornography is produced by raping and abusing children. Regular porn is produced by two adults having consensual sex.

Not the same, sicko.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
How do you dispute someones sperm inside the orafus of a child or a videotape of him raping a child ?


One of the greatest film clips that i have ever seen was when this father of a child that was raped and murdered was hiding in a telephone booth near a courthouse where the guy that was convicted ( he plead GUILTY) of the crime was being escorted away by the cops. The father ran out of the booth, pulled out a gun, and blew the fuckers head off. then he calmly put the gun down and surrendered. i will probably get flamed for this, but it was one of the most satisfying things i have ever seen. Even more so, i can just imagine the fathers satisfaction.

Andy
Pure and simple it is vigilante justice. The murderer is setting himself up as judge, jury, and executioner.

Honestly, are you in favour of vigilante justice?
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,776
0
0
Honestly, are you in favour of vigilante justice?
My boss who grew up in the mean streets of Parkdale said back in the days, the community would deal appropriately with pedos. No need to involve the police, lawyers, judges, the courts and social workers. The rule on the street back then was "you don't hurt children". Not saying I agree or disagree with "community justice". Maybe we are more "civilized" now.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
My boss who grew up in the mean streets of Parkdale said back in the days, the community would deal appropriately with pedos. No need to involve the police, lawyers, judges, the courts and social workers. The rule on the street back then was "you don't hurt children". Not saying I agree or disagree with "community justice". Maybe we are more "civilized" now.
The problem Rockslinger, is that the community often gets it wrong.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-vigilante-neighbours-mistook-paedophile.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...vigilante-mob-wrongly-accused-paedophile.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...pended-arresting-man-burned-death-estate.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...te-vigilantes-wrongly-branded-paedophile.html
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,776
0
0
The problem Rockslinger, is that the community often gets it wrong.
Not so sure about that. Back in the Stone Age when my boss grew up in Parkdale, it was a fairly tight knit and stable community and everybody knew everybody. Now nobody even know that the neighbour next door is a pedo.
BTW: I grew up in small town Northern Ontario and again it was a stable tight knit community and everybody knew everybody and our neighbours would look out for the kids. Me and my two best friends would wander everywhere without adult supervision even though we were only 8 years old. Try leaving your 8 year old son or daughter unsupervised for 5 minutes in a big city park if you dare.
 

afterhours

New member
Jul 14, 2009
6,322
3
0
Not so sure about that. Back in the Stone Age when my boss grew up in Parkdale, it was a fairly tight knit and stable community and everybody knew everybody. Now nobody even know that the neighbour next door is a pedo.
BTW: I grew up in small town Northern Ontario and again it was a stable tight knit community and everybody knew everybody and our neighbours would look out for the kids. Me and my two best friends would wander everywhere without adult supervision even though we were only 8 years old. Try leaving your 8 year old son or daughter unsupervised for 5 minutes in a big city park if you dare.
I've heard enough stories about small town pedofiles who fucked their gfs' children with impunity to know better.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,776
0
0
Ok, here is a tough question and probably tougher to answer. Were any of you personally molested as a child?
 
Toronto Escorts