Imagine If All Atheists Left America

[canada-man]

Proof you didn't read my C&P. Thanks.

Why ask for evidence when you don't even bother reading it. Oh, a closed little mind.

i went over the website and the author is a religious thiest. one of his posts even claim that athiests lack empathy because he saw a study which say autism folks are more atheist.

multiple studies going back decades show that higher intelligence correlates with low religiosity


a story in NZ show intelligent people are less religious even a christian bishop agrees

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10750898




http://www.sodahead.com/living/stud...-intelligence-your-thoughts/question-3244903/

 

[mrsCALoki]

LOL you really are a strange person.

Is there any proof string theory is valid?

Is there any proof that the god-particle exists?

Is there any proof that a perfect vacuum will kill a man?

Very few scientists etc will claim that absence of proof is proof of the absence of the particle.

At most they say.... "I do not believe in string theory"

They do not have the blind faith to say they do not exist.

Unlike you and your blind faith in atheism.

Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

 

[mrsCALoki]

i
multiple studies going back decades show that higher intelligence correlates with low religiosity

I think you are confusing finding organized religion and ritual a sham and knowing there is no god.

 

[FAST]

I don't beleive in the easter bunny either

For atheists this may be true only for some of the militant ones. A lot of atheists
are silent about their non-belief. Speaking for myself I never ever once in my life
had to tell someone face to face that there is no god.

I DO NOT believe in a GOD, am NOT an atheist, and like you, would NEVER tell a believer that there are no GOD(s), as I CANNOT prove to them, there are no GOD(s).

But how many times does it need to be said that a label is NOT required for anyone who does not "believe" or have "faith".

The term "atheist" was created by the religious, is a term used by the religious.

Although the recent thread about some obvious agnostics in England who constantly need to be assured that they are right, is a good example of how the evolution of the term from a derogative, to a more up to date useage, as label for people with this mind set, and should only be.

NOT TO ANYBODY WHO JUST DOES NOT "BELIEVE".

FAST

 

[canada-man]

LOL you really are a strange person.

what do you mean?

Is there any proof string theory is valid?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

Is there any proof that the god-particle exists?

they just found the particle last year the higgs bosun particle

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

Is there any proof that a perfect vacuum will kill a man?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum#Effects_on_humans_and_animals

Very few scientists etc will claim that absence of proof is proof of the absence of the particle.

scientists unlike the religious don't assert claims without providing evidence

At most they say.... "I do not believe in string theory"

most of the public don't know about string theory

They do not have the blind faith to say they do not exist.

if you don't believe in something it is NOT faith. faith is believing without evidence

Unlike you and your blind faith in atheism.

not believe in a god is NOT faith how many times must i repeat this

Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

if you make an assertion about the existence of something and you don't offer proof and evidence for it. I cannot believe it.



Definition of FAITH

1
a : allegiance to duty or a person : loyalty
b (1) : fidelity to one's promises (2) : sincerity of intentions
2
a (1) : belief and trust in and loyalty to God (2) : belief in the traditional doctrines of a religion
b (1) : firm belief in something for which there is no proof (2) : complete trust
3
: something that is believed especially with strong conviction; especially : a system of religious beliefs <the Protestant faith>
— on faith
: without question <took everything he said on faith>

synonyms

devotion, piety, religion

 

[blackrock13]

i went over the website and the author is a religious thiest. one of his posts even claim that athiests lack empathy because he saw a study which say autism folks are more atheist.

multiple studies going back decades show that higher intelligence correlates with low religiosity

a story in NZ show intelligent people are less religious even a christian bishop agrees

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10750898

http://www.sodahead.com/living/stud...-intelligence-your-thoughts/question-3244903/

Yes, the columnist is a theist, but the studies he was commented on weren't, nice try.

For hundreds of years, a few thousand people thought the sun revolved around the earth and 'vapours' were the main cause of many deceases, but they were proven wrong.

 

[Scarey]

I believe there is a 2 group of individuals that would help America more by leaving......psychopaths and sociopaths.Very few of them are serial killers or do great harm.They simply excel more in life because they have little to no fear of consequences or failure.They are ruthless and crave nothing but power and dominance at the peril of others.

They may have faith ,or not, but at the end of the day they all believe one thing.I should be able to do whatever i want to do....and you should like me for it.Religion does not kill(though i'm not a fan of it).Individuals with a sense of superiority over everyone and no need nor want of a psychological compass to ground them...kills in many ways.....economically, spiritually, socially,financially.It's that simple

 

[canada-man]

I DO NOT believe in a GOD, am NOT an atheist, and like you, would NEVER tell a believer that there are no GOD(s), as I CANNOT prove to them, there are no GOD(s).

But how many times does it need to be said that a label is NOT required for anyone who does not "believe" or have "faith".

The term "atheist" was created by the religious, is a term used by the religious.

Although the recent thread about some obvious agnostics in England who constantly need to be assured that they are right, is a good example of how the evolution of the term from a derogative, to a more up to date useage, as label for people with this mind set, and should only be.

NOT TO ANYBODY WHO JUST DOES NOT "BELIEVE".

FAST

in ancient Greco-Roman times "atheist" was used to described those who don't believe in the dominant gods and goddesses. early Christians were called atheists.

 

[mrsCALoki]

what do you mean?

Faith:


3
: something that is believed especially with strong conviction; especially : a system of religious beliefs <the Protestant faith>
— on faith
: without question <took everything he said on faith>

Sorry, if you cannot see that believing in an unstructured unguided universe, is by definition believing in something.... continuing the conversation is pointless.

Your blind faith in your words eliminates all possibility you are wrong.

 

[blackrock13]

I DO NOT believe in a GOD, am NOT an atheist, and like you, would NEVER tell a believer that there are no GOD(s), as I CANNOT prove to them, there are no GOD(s).

But how many times does it need to be said that a label is NOT required for anyone who does not "believe" or have "faith".

The term "atheist" was created by the religious, is a term used by the religious.

Although the recent thread about some obvious agnostics in England who constantly need to be assured that they are right, is a good example of how the evolution of the term from a derogative, to a more up to date useage, as label for people with this mind set, and should only be.

NOT TO ANYBODY WHO JUST DOES NOT "BELIEVE".

FAST

I sure would like to see some support for this comment or is it just your opinion.

As for your 'label' comment, it seems to be was only you saying it here, and we all know how you hate labels.

 

[blackrock13]

Sorry, if you cannot see that believing in an unstructured unguided universe, is by definition believing in something.... continuing the conversation is pointless.

Your blind faith in your words eliminates all possibility you are wrong.

Well put.

 

[canada-man]

Sorry, if you cannot see that believing in an unstructured unguided universe, is by definition believing in something.... continuing the conversation is pointless.

Your blind faith in your words eliminates all possibility you are wrong.

provide evidence that the universe was "guided"

blind faith in my words? what are you talking about?

 

[mrsCALoki]

provide evidence that the universe was "guided"

blind faith in my words? what are you talking about?

I am sorry sir, I never ever argue with religious fanatics regardless of their belief. One can never win them because they KNOW THE TRUTH.

I am not bowing to your wisdom or your truth. Iam just aware that arguing with a religious fanatic is pointless.

 

[canada-man]

I am sorry sir, I never ever argue with religious fanatics regardless of their belief. One can never win them because they KNOW THE TRUTH.

I am not bowing to your wisdom or your truth. Iam just aware that arguing with a religious fanatic is pointless.

you are mistaking me for somebody else. I don't believe in religion nor gods and it is typical of somebody to use insults when unable to refute an athiest like myself who simply ask for evidence

 

[blackrock13]

provide evidence that the universe was "guided"

blind faith in my words? what are you talking about?

Why, you've shown you wouldn't read it if she did. If she did offer up arguments for debate, it certainly would take more bandwidth than you're willing to wade through. Divine intervention is a major debate that has gone on for years and you expect anyone here to rehash it for you entertainment.

 

[canada-man]

Why, you've shown you wouldn't read it if she did. If she did offer up arguments for debate, it certainly would take more bandwidth than you're willing to wade through. Divine intervention is a major debate that has gone on for years and you expect anyone here to rehash it for you entertainment.

there is no evidence for divine intervention.

 

[mrsCALoki]

you are mistaking me for somebody else. I don't believe in religion nor gods and it is typical of somebody to use insults when unable to refute an athiest like myself who simply ask for evidence

I hope I did not imply insults etc. I just said that I do not wish to try and discuss religious topics with people who have blind faith in their point of view

 

[blackrock13]

you are mistaking me for somebody else. I don't believe in religion nor gods and it is typical of somebody to use insults when unable to refute an athiest like myself who simply ask for evidence

You must think she was calling you a religious fanatic, although it could be argued from you posting history that you are fanatical about religion, almost pathological.

 

[canada-man]

You must think she was calling you a religious fanatic, although it could be argued from you posting history that you are fanatical about religion, almost pathological.

according to blackrock13 my official opposition posting news stories of crimes committed by the religious is fanatical. everyday there are news stories about religious hate crimes

 

[mrsCALoki]

according to blackrock13 my official opposition posting news stories of crimes committed by the religious is fanatical. everyday there are news stories about religious hate crimes

I do not believe religion and god are related in any significant way