M'thinks it was not fuji letting the facts fall by the wayside...Once Fuji has a theory the facts fall by the wayside for him.
Perry
M'thinks it was not fuji letting the facts fall by the wayside...Once Fuji has a theory the facts fall by the wayside for him.
Or not.M'thinks it was not fuji letting the facts fall by the wayside...
Perry
obviously she was fucked up, and the family is just looking to cash in. Niw I believe the hospital. they wouldnt try to discipline a suicidal employee.So, the plot thickens...
We are now getting FACTS... which are always important and relevant before before people [as several have done here] start jumping to conclusions!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Duchess-Cambridge-attempted-kill-before.html
Thanks Danmand for getting the lead on this... but why start another thread?
Perry
Riiiight. No proof, just speculation from an Indian news source, but of course you'd believe it.obviously she was fucked up, and the family is just looking to cash in.
Like I always say, the truth eventually comes out. the media just looks to create public anger by sensationalizing things, forget about logic they just play on emotion and everybody falls for itRiiiight. No proof, just speculation from an Indian news source, but of course you'd believe it.
Why do these things have to be exclusionary? Subject to depression; cruelly taken advantage of by the DJ's;, feeling that she had betrayed her own standards, the Hospital and the Duchess; the Hospital not have disciplined her all can fit together as far as I can see.obviously she was fucked up, and the family is just looking to cash in. Niw I believe the hospital. they wouldnt try to discipline a suicidal employee.
You always say, do you? Yet you are saying she's 'fucked up' and 'the family are in in for the money' based on inferences, beliefs and maybes, from a press that ranks in the bottom thirds in freedom and reliability, just above Russia; although well north of Belarus, which is 168th out of 170 countries.Like I always say, the truth eventually comes out. the media just looks to create public anger by sensationalizing things, forget about logic they just play on emotion and everybody falls for it
I don't agree.That the woman had a history of depressive illness once again goes to egg shell.
all media is scum. if the daily mail has posted baseless slander, the family can sue them.You always say, do you? Yet you are saying she's 'fucked up' and 'the family are in in for the money' based on inferences, beliefs and maybes, from a press that ranks in the bottom thirds in freedom and reliability, just above Russia; although well north of Belarus, which is 168th out of 170 countries.
Are you 12? My apologies to those who are 12.all media is scum. if the daily mail has posted baseless slander, the family can sue them.
Seems eminently unreasonable...However, I still believe that criminal charges may well be forthcoming in both England and Australia and further her family may have a civil case against the Station and DJs.
Because as I've already stated the suicide is but a small part of it. Having said that shall we agree to disagree.Seems eminently unreasonable...
If you cannot establish civil liability on the bassis of the facts, how are you going to establish criminal liability upon the same, identical facts?
Perry
We've been over that point ad nauseam and there is plenty of disagreement with your position.So? The DJs aren't in any way responsible