Yawn.Yes. If they are not stopped the death toll will be tens of millions if not hundreds of millions.
hundreds of millions, why not say the whole world is doomed, doomed I say, muah ha ha hah ha......
Yawn.Yes. If they are not stopped the death toll will be tens of millions if not hundreds of millions.
You are the only one clinging to the fiction that Iran's nuclear intentions are peaceful.Yawn.
IS developing weapons of mass destruction a crime in Iran?Developing weapons of mass destruction. They could be detained on a security certificate--so long as they're not able to just move on and set up shop somewhere else: their work developing nuclear weapons for the bad guys has to stop.
If you like, they could just be held as POW's. The point is to keep them from working on WMD's for rogue states. Whoever captured them would compose the security certificate.IS developing weapons of mass destruction a crime in Iran?
And who would compose the security certificate? Jordan Isreal..?
Me and the IAEA, oh, and the US state department.You are the only one clinging to the fiction that Iran's nuclear intentions are peaceful.
It is far less concerning when a democracy obtains nuclear weapons than when a state sponsor of terrorism does. Even the Arab states are calling for Iran to be taken out, the threat is perceived as real by all but you.
Citation needed: Quote me the US State Dept. asserting that Iran has only peaceful nuclear intentions.Me and the IAEA, oh, and the US state department.
False. Propaganda.Well, since Israel is also a sponsor, or actively a terrorist state
IS there a state of war with Iran I am not aware of?If you like, they could just be held as POW's. The point is to keep them from working on WMD's for rogue states. Whoever captured them would compose the security certificate.
There will be once we invade and forcibly change the regime there--the topic of this thread.IS there a state of war with Iran I am not aware of?
By we I hope you are referring to Canada and your European allies....There will be once we invade and forcibly change the regime there--the topic of this thread.
Hopefully the entirety of NATO.By we I hope you are referring to Canada and your European allies....
OTB
So your premise is based on an invasion by NATO , that is very unlikly to happen, charging employees of a sovreign nation with a crime that I don't believe actually exists for following orders....There will be once we invade and forcibly change the regime there--the topic of this thread.
How about NATO minus the US - I think we have our hands full and it would certainly be time for someone else to take the initiative.... like that's going to happen.Hopefully the entirety of NATO.
Its WMD madness all over again!!!There will be once we invade and forcibly change the regime there--the topic of this thread.
Funny thing...no-one is asking the US to take the lead - well, maybe the American Industrial Military complex is, but no-one else.How about NATO minus the US - I think we have our hands full and it would certainly be time for someone else to take the initiative.... like that's going to happen.
OTB
So in your view it would be better to let rogue states build nuclear weapons?So your premise is based on an invasion by NATO , that is very unlikly to happen, charging employees of a sovreign nation with a crime that I don't believe actually exists for following orders....
Well Christmas is coming and miracles do happen
I'll be waiting to see if anyone else leads... I'm betting against it.Funny thing...no-one is asking the US to take the lead - well, maybe the American Industrial Military complex is, but no-one else.
We did ask you to help out in 1939 - when it was REALLY NEEDED, but you chickened out for 3 years.
Reading things into quotes that are not there again I see.So in your view it would be better to let rogue states build nuclear weapons?
I'd like to hear what you think might really happen if either Iran or North Korea get the bomb, though North Korea already may have it.So in your view it would be better to let rogue states build nuclear weapons?
I'm curious why you think South Africa would want to buy a nuke?I'd like to hear what you think might really happen if either Iran or North Korea get the bomb, though North Korea already may have it.
Do you expect that Iran would attack another nuclear armed country like Israel, or a country on the other side of the globe like Canada or the US?
Do you expect that Iran would sell a nuclear bomb to South Africa or Al Qaeda, despite their differences?
Do you really think that Iran would give Hamas or Hezbollah the bomb?
What is your real worry?