Android Invasion: The Next Phase Begins..

AnimalMagnetism

Self Imposed Exile
Apr 21, 2006
3,744
0
36
Toronto
Just bought 3 android based smart phones. i was going to wait for Windows Mobile 7 but I figure i'll just get another one when it comes out at the end of the year. on another note does anyone else see history repeating itself? When the first mac came out Apple was the thing to get...Jobs got greedy (my way or the highway attitude), along came MS and down Apple went. Now again we have the Iphone, Ipad and Apple is again the thing to get. Jobs is getting greedy again and now there's Google to challenge them. The tide is turning, slowly but it is turning. People are getting rid of their Iphones in favour of Android because they don't have to put up with Apple's restrictions.
good points and congratulations on your Android phones. Win7 will supposedly be in the fall. but i really think MS have dropped the ball on mobile computing
here is Apples 1984 ad when the big competitor was IBM and apple was accusing them of being "Big Brother"

it's funny to see how Apple have become just that....they want to control every aspect of how you use your apple devices and what you can view and connect to it.
 

canucklehead

Active member
Oct 16, 2003
2,428
17
38
you must be in a seeding group more important than the attendees of the conference and the tech writers, because only a few have received the update to their google nexus phones.
next to get it are HTC Evo 4g which was handed out to all attendees of the conference.....it came with 2.1

so i must say, if you have 2.2 on a Milestone, i'm impressed. maybe you're someone i should know ;)

Hopefully your version was the OTA one


[Update] Froyo May Have Been Launched Prematurely
by Quentyn Kennemer on May 24th, 2010


[Update]: There’s been some clarification on what happened with the file (which is being considered “unofficial” and shouldn’t have even been downloadable in the first place) that was a supposed Android 2.2 update. QuietlyCoding – whose findings you can read here – spoke with Google to determine that even though the update name for Froyo might be the same as what’s been received OTA, it’s still possible that whatever it contained was not intended for installation. If you do decide to flash the file (or stick with the file you’ve already flash), then you do it at your own risk, as usual.
Everyone was excited for the prospect of being able to attempt to apply the Android 2.2 update to their Nexus One over the weekend, but it looks like a gun may have been jumped just a bit too soon. Shortly after the download link for Froyo went live, Google pulled it down without any trace of it ever existing on their servers.

Since then, users have uploaded the files to several of their own servers for everyone to download (nothing truly gets deleted from the internet). Some users are having a world of trouble after installing the update, now, and it may be because that version of Froyo is unfinished and was unintended for consumer devices.

The biggest issues appear to be battery life, the lack of certain “advertised” features (although Google did state that not all of the features shown at Google I/O would be enabled in Froyo off the bat), and voice controls not working. Whether or not you are experiencing these issues, it’s apparent that things aren’t as they should be for a lot of people. The fact that Google yanked the download link might not be related to the issues (or may not necessarily mean that it was indeed an unfinished Froyo), but there’s definitely room to check in with them and see what’s going on. We’ll let you know if we’ve heard anything back from them worth communicating.

source http://phandroid.com/2010/05/24/froyo-may-have-been-launched-prematurely/
With a site in the Alexa top 500 .... and developing web apps for it .... i would say yeah ..... just because i am retired from full time employment does not mean you don't get the perks.... PS i was back from the SF on friday ... and will be back at the Moscone for the Apple Developer Conference in June... i enjoyed my morning at Mel's as well... worst but favourite breakfast place in SF...... nope not over the air ...
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
This article does a nice job of pulling apart the numbers and the strategies behind Apple and Google....

OTB

Reality Check: NPD’s Android vs. iPhone sales headlines
May 10th, 2010


Daniel Eran Dilger

Headlines tell such a sensationalized side of the story. Here’s the missing bits of recent tech media events that have been reported with a slant starting with:

NPD says Android has surpassed iPhone in US unit sales
.
The suggestion: the reign of iPhone is over because Google’s Android platform is taking over the market in terms of sales and installed base.

The reality: Android sales are certainly not eating up iPhone sales, which are higher than ever–especially in the first quarter, when Apple’s hardware sales have historically plateaued. Rather than taking on the iPhone, Android is really just replacing the plummeting sales of Windows Mobile and the old Palm OS (and even webOS) and the embedded software that formerly ran a lot of HTC and Motorola phones. Consumers are upgrading away from pseudo-smartphones from LG and Samsung, and buying more advanced smartphones, which looks good for Android.

Globally however, Android sales are still well below the iPhone. According to IDC, Apple took 16.1% share of smartphones in the quarter, while HTC and Motorola (the only Android makers, who also sell other non-Android smartphones) amassed a combined global share of 9%. Android’s total share is less than half that of second place RIM’s BlackBerry sales and less than a quarter of the smartphones sold by Nokia, but Android is getting a lot of press to suggest that it is taking over the market, at least in the US.

Why is Android doing so well in the US? It’s the same reason RIM’s BlackBerry sales have kept pace ahead of the iPhone, despite failing to best or even match Apple’s platform in terms of technology: most of those phones are being given away for free. That’s an easy way to claim market share, but not really a way to actually create sustainable growth. And if you look at RIM’s global sales in the last quarter, they’re only up 45% year over year compared to Apple’s 131% growth, despite all of RIM’s promotional free giveaways contrasted with Apple’s actual sales to customers.

Apple iPhone smartphone market share surges; RIM slips | ZDNet

NPD’s numbers aren’t a story of Android competing against iPhone as much as Verizon trying to keep up with AT&T’s iPhone trajectory by dumping a ton of free smartphones into the market, many of which happen to use some version of the Android OS. Even so, Verizon is still behind AT&T in terms of smartphone sales.

It’s also notable that only a third of the installed base of Android phones are running the modern Android 2.x. The majority are still running last year’s versions, meaning that Android as a platform is fractionalized to the point where sales (and free giveaways) are not creating a viable market for modern software.

Add in the technical issues that prevent Android apps from being sophisticated (they’re limited in size due to hardware architecture and operating system software issues that have not been resolved) and you have a platform that is smaller than it should be, and therefore less attractive to developers than it would appear it ought to be, given all those free phones that are being distributed.

Inside Google’s Android and Apple’s iPhone OS as business models

On the other hand, Apple’s other iPhone OS devices, the iPod touch and iPad, are not figured into these smartphone numbers but clearly have a huge impact on the market share and installed base that is driving iPhone OS apps. Statistics have long indicated that iPod touch users are buying more apps than even iPhone users, so Apple’s parallel efforts are bolstering the iPhone App Store by a huge amount (approaching a 100% increase over iPhone sales alone) even as Android’s fractionalization problems are deeply cutting away at the critical mass of the Android Market.

Apple’s iPod touch is also driving game development to the point where Apple’s mobile platform is encroaching upon dedicated game systems. Apple now has 20% of that market, nearly double the share taken by the Sony PSP and nearly three times what the iPhone OS claimed just last year. Android isn’t even represented on that pie chart, because there is no viable gaming market on Google’s platform. If Android were really outselling the iPhone OS in some meaningful way, that shouldn’t be the case at all.

Android 2.2 to do things we assumed it already did

Both Google and Apple are accomplishing exactly what they’re intending to do. The purpose of Android is to broaden the base of mobiles that are tied to Google’s adware-based services, rather than Microsoft (Windows Mobile) or perhaps Symbian, which could possibly ally with Microsoft given the deal between Nokia and Microsoft to bring mobile versions of Office to Symbian at some point.

The purpose of the iPhone is to sell new hardware at a profit and dramatically expand the market for Cocoa-based software development. Google doesn’t really care about the hardware margins of its partners, and can’t seem to really sell its own Nexus One branded phone. Google doesn’t care about hardware.

It also isn’t that excited about creating a mobile software platform. It hopes the open source community will accomplish most of that work for it. Google engineers have informed me that the company’s long term plan isn’t to do anything with Android’s Java-like VM or even the new C-based native platform; Google sees the future of mobile apps developed in the same code as it sees desktop apps: the web. The company is betting everything on HTML5. Talk about Android’s current VM, NDK, and Google’s support for Flash are all just efforts at covering the bases until mobile HTML5 apps can become a reality.

Apple sees HTML5 as a useful tool for developing web apps, but unlike Google, the company isn’t sold on the idea that the desktop and native mobile platforms are going to vanish anytime soon. Apple is putting significant efforts into developing Cocoa and Cocoa Touch as viable platforms well into the future, serving needs that web apps can’t serve now and many never really excel at.

That’s why Google’s apps are nearly all web based (Maps, Docs, Gmail, etc) and Apple’s are all native (iWorks, iLife, iPhone apps, Pro Apps). It should come as no surprise that Google’s support for cheap, low quality phones that can be given away for free is an extension of that adware/web-based strategy, while Apple’s sophisticated, premium iPhone market that exacts the world’s highest ASPs while still biting off a third place share of the global market is exactly what Apple is trying to do.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Interesting fact from AT&T exec today - 40% of iPhone sales are the enterprise users.... that should make RIM nervous.

OTB
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Luckily, you are on the top of things, OTB. You never miss a beat and very few follow the latest trends the way you do. Today's corporate world exists thanks to the guys like you. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that you are Mr. Steve Jobs himself!
LOL, I wish.... although I do admit to having a black moc-turtle neck or two......

OTB
 

AnimalMagnetism

Self Imposed Exile
Apr 21, 2006
3,744
0
36
Toronto
Sprint HTC EVO: First 4G Android Phone Feels Like the Future

The new Sprint HTC EVO sports some of the nicest hardware you can find on any mobile device on the market and boasts some of the burliest specs we've ever seen in a phone (4G finally!). What's more, it's just drop-dead gorgeous; the kind of thing that compels others to ask about it when you take it out of your pocket.

So the EVO's greatest draw is its 4G WiMax compatibility. How did it work? Uh ... we don't know. We tested the phone in San Francisco, which is not currently wired for 4G. If you're considering the EVO for its data-processing chops, take a look at where 4G is currently deployed.

However, it did do far better with 3G than our iPhone. We took the phone to three different locations in San Francisco where AT&T has coverage holes, and in every case, had a 3G data connection (sometimes slow) while our iPhone wouldn't even make calls. While this may be less of an issue in areas where AT&T delivers the coverage it advertises, those who suffer its inadequate network will be happy to know there's a robust alternative.

On the hardware front, the giant 4.3-inch display makes the iPhone and Nexus One feel dinky in comparison, yet it remains small and light enough to slip easily into a pocket. It flaunts an 8-megapixel camera (with flash) on the back, along with a 1.3-megapixel sensor adorning the front. This dual-screen action allows you to preview pics in order to take well-framed self portraits of yourself and your pals.

The camera also shoots 720p video — it won't replace your HD camcorder, but it's a fantastic shooter to have in your pocket. A kickstand in the back lets you stand it up like a television, while an HDMI port lets you connect it to a TV. The 1-GHZ Snapdragon processor feels faster than the Indy 500 while the phone seemingly has more antennas than your average police car, with 3G, 4G (WiMax), Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, FM and GPS connectivity.

All those antennas are put to good use. The navigation system is on par with or better than most standalone GPS units. Moreover, the phone feels designed for the internet from the get-go. On launch, it walks you through setting up your Google, Facebook, Twitter and other social media accounts. It imported our Facebook and Google contacts into the phone in seconds, and thanks to Google Voice integration, we were able to use an existing number. We also loved the ability to tether the phone. In just three clicks, you can set up a Wi-Fi connection to send internet to your computer.

Our only real hardware complaint is that the OLED display could bit brighter and crisper — it looks slightly fuzzy next to an iPhone — and we noticed some odd cyclical dimming effects when reading long blocks of text on web pages.

The overall interface is excellent, easily one of the most user-friendly of all the Android phones we've laid hands on. When we handed the phone off to a user who had never before tried Android, she was immersed in seconds and able to do e-mail, surf the internet and tweet without instruction. It's worth noting that the phone does not ship with the newly announced Froyo (2.2) version of Android, however HTC has announced that it intends to update phones released in 2010 with that version of the OS.

Our major quibble is that the battery on the EVO is shorter-lived than a plotline in a Seth McFarland show. A typical use situation gave us about 6 hours of battery life. After driving around town to test the GPS and 3G signals we ran out of juice in just over 4 hours. The situation was even worse when we flipped on the 4G antenna. In short, it won't make it through the day without a recharge. While the battery on the EVO is replaceable, so you can carry a spare, we look forward to a day when smartphone battery life is reasonably matched to power consumption.

Overall, we loved this phone. The hardware is smart and well-appointed, the interface is pleasant and straightforward, and it just plain worked. In short, it felt like a call from the future; one not dropped by AT&T.

WIRED Fantastic camera. Blazing fast internet. More connection options than Grand Central Station. Slick user interface easy for novices, yet allows power users to get their nerd on. Dead-simple tethering. Touchscreen keyboard offers ample space, even for fat-fingered types. Seamless connection with social networks gives it an old-friend feel right out of box.

TIRED 4G coverage spottier than an oil-stained Louisiana beach. Odd dimness issues with display. Android cut/copy/paste so poor you'd do better rekeying. Battery life shorter than Verne Troyer.

7 out of 10

Manufacturer: Sprint


Source http://www.wired.com/reviews/produc...op+Stories+2))&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher


The first 4G phone available, first with cam on front, soon to have Android 2.2 upgrade.
nice looking phone...the hits just keep coming with Googles Android
 
Last edited:

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Why do they all look like iPhones......

It's becoming a commodity

OTB
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com

nova5

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2009
1,882
0
0
OTM, iPad 22% . . . amazing change here . . .
What happened to Blackberry’s 4%?
 

djk

Active member
Apr 8, 2002
5,953
0
36
the hobby needs more capitalism
OTM, iPad 22% . . . amazing change here . . .
What happened to Blackberry’s 4%?
Blackberry users are not big web users. Why? I suspect its due to the lackluster browser that Blackberry offers.

I work in a dept of about 150 employees, our campus has around 3,000 employees. The majority of users in my dept use Blackberry (also company wide). Their usage consists of email, BBM (Blackberry Messenger) and Facebook (through the app). That's about it.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Blackberry users are not big web users. Why? I suspect its due to the lackluster browser that Blackberry offers.

I work in a dept of about 150 employees, our campus has around 3,000 employees. The majority of users in my dept use Blackberry (also company wide). Their usage consists of email, BBM (Blackberry Messenger) and Facebook (through the app). That's about it.
The question for RIM will be, will the one trick pony of mobile email be enough to keep them relevant.

OTB
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Apple iPhone Web marketshare outgrows Google Android in May

By Slash Lane
Published: 12:50 PM EST

Despite a larger variety of devices running the Google Android operating system available on the market, Apple's iPhone operating system still outgained its rival in terms of Web presence in the month of May.

New statistics released this week by Net Applications show that Apple increased its mobile browser share from 30.3 percent a month prior to 32.8 percent in May. During the same time, Android also grew, but by a smaller amount -- from 5.3 percent to 6.2 percent.

"Google's operating system, Android is rapidly gaining usage share. However, the iPhone still maintains a large lead," the report said.

The top platform remains Java Micro Edition, which is found in use on a variety of older smartphones. However, it is rapidly losing share to both the iPhone and Android.

Apple's next closest competitor is Symbian, which had a 13.98 percent share in May. During the same period, BlackBerry accounted for 3.59 percent of mobile Web browsing, while Windows Mobile took 2.97 percent. While many competitors have remained static or shrunk, monthly tracking data from Net Applications has shown steady growth for the iPhone over some time.

The firm also tracked a spike in iPad usage over the weekend, after the device launched internationally in nine new countries. Last Friday, Apple's new multitouch device went on sale in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

Net Applications found that iPad usage jumped from an 0.08 percent total Web presence on May 27 to 0.12 percent on Friday, May 28. The numbers crept higher over the weekend, with the iPad representing 0.17 percent on Saturday, May 29, and dipping slightly to 0.16 percent on Sunday.

Saturday's total of 0.17 percent represented the highest single day of Web use of the iPad yet, according to Net Applications. The company began tracking the online presence of its device soon after it launched, and found that it quickly began to rival the Android and BlackBerry mobile platforms.
 

djk

Active member
Apr 8, 2002
5,953
0
36
the hobby needs more capitalism
The question for RIM will be, will the one trick pony of mobile email be enough to keep them relevant.

OTB
Hard to say.

I've said it before and I will say it again. I think for heavy email usage, RIM has the best experience.

The other lock in is BBM. I've had co-workers play with my iPhone for 20 minutes and then the following exchange will happen:

"God, it's so cool. I want to get one but it doesn't have BBM, right?! I need BBM!"
"Who do you BBM with?"
"People from work mostly."
"Well, the company pays for our bills. Just use text instead. They don't care as long as you're delivering."
"But I like BBM..."

So, it's email, BBM and physical keyboard as the reasons why BB users stay loyal, IMO.
 

nova5

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2009
1,882
0
0
So, it's email, BBM and physical keyboard as the reasons why BB users stay loyal, IMO.
--
I agree! If email, physical keyboard and security are issues than RIM is a very good choice at this time.
 

djk

Active member
Apr 8, 2002
5,953
0
36
the hobby needs more capitalism
--
I agree! If email, physical keyboard and security are issues than RIM is a very good choice at this time.
The security is great for companies because it allows them to define everything the end user can and cannot do. Not so great for most end users because they don't want to be restricted but hey, the company is paying the bill. :)
 

nova5

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2009
1,882
0
0
10 Things Android Does Better Than iPhone OS


1: Android can Run Multiple Apps at the Same Time
2: Android Keeps Information Visible on Your Home Screen
3: Android Has a Better App Market
4: Android Gives You Better Notifications
5: Android Lets You Choose Your Hardware
6: Android Lets You Choose Your Carrier
7: Android Lets You Install Custom ROMs
8: Android Lets You Change Your Settings Faster
9: Android Does Google and Social Integration
10: Android Gives You More Options to Fit Your Budget

Source:
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/10_things_android_does_better_iphone
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts