Jermaine Dye is a pure right fielder (albeit with diminished defensive range) and, by all accounts an excellent leader and locker room guy. The Jays do not have a RF (Snider is - or should be - a left fielder) unless they play Bautista there every day, which I don't see being a good thing. They certainly need a veteran leadership presence - Doc's gone and I think it's obvious that Vernon Wells is not nor ever will be that for the Jays.In a year when the Jays have NO CHANCE of playing .500 ball, why sign Dye? I would be more inclined to give Ruiz or Snyder more at bats. They work for less, and have more upside.
why sign Dye?..exactly as you quoted, we dont know how Wells will hit, Lind and Hill will have good years but are still young players and the Yankees are reportedly looking for another power bat to replace Matsui. Adding Dye with Arod and Tex could be a devestating 1.2.3. punch, and thy,r concerned about Nick Johnson staying healthy for the year,,,so why would the Jays let the Yanks or Bosox have him,,,spend the freekin $$ Rogers to justify my increase monthly bill!!!In a year when the Jays have NO CHANCE of playing .500 ball, why sign Dye? I would be more inclined to give Ruiz or Snyder more at bats. They work for less, and have more upside.
Don't kid yourselves. The Jays pitching is likely to be terrible this year. To have a decent season they need Lind and Hill to be as good as last year (not likely) and Wells to come out of his 2 year coma. why soi
Non hitting SS and 3rd base aren't going to help the cause. I don't see this team winning more than 70.
Wells will hit .261 with 17 HRs and 82 RBI's.we dont know how Wells will hit,
He's a career .247 hitter with a .294 on base percentage who will hit between 10-15 hrs per year.How good is he? Can he hit? Can he field?
Marco Scutaro 2009 : 12 hr .282 b.a. .984 fielding percentageHe's a career .247 hitter with a .294 on base percentage who will hit between 10-15 hrs per year.
He has a .970 career fielding percentage and never won a gold glove.
Bottom line unless he really turns it around he will not come close too what Scutaro did for the Jays last year.
Of course I took Marco's last year because thats what counts the most.Marco Scutaro 2009 : 12 hr .282 b.a. .984 fielding percentage
8 seasons: 13 hr .265 b.a. .977 fielding percentage
Alex Gonzalez 2009: 8 hr .238 b.a. .984 fielding percentage
11 seasons: 15 hr .247 b.a. .970 fielding percentage
You pick Scutaro's best season, and compare it to Gonzalez's career. That is hardly comparing apples to apple. A.G.'s fielding %'age has improved almost every year in M.L.B.
Scutaro put up the best numbers of his career in '09 . M.S. is 34 years old. He was in a contract year. Shortstops don't typically improve as they hit their mid-thirties.
The Red Sox signed M.S. to a 2 year + option (around $6,250,000 per), whereas the Jays are only on the hook to A.G. for one year with a club option for 2011 ($2,750,000 per). I don't see M.S. being more than twice the player that A.G. is.
What offensive numbers does the lunch bucket put up ?Scutaro is a lunch buckett guy who is improving as he goes.
He's at least a .20 point better hitter than AG who will take a walk and even lean into a pitch to get on base.
He can play a multitude of positions as well.
He was a perfect fit for the Jays at the top of the lineup and I'm not sure who can replace him to be honest with you.
Who do you suggest?
Bautista!! My lord.What offensive numbers does the lunch bucket put up ?
As far as who's going to bat lead off for the Blue Jays, that's a good question. My best guess at this point is Jose Bautista.
.
Should be 9th in the lineup, but, it wouldn't surprise me if Cito bats him leadoff, at least to start the year.Bautista!! My lord.
His OBP is .329 , doesn't steal any bases and strikes out too much.
He should be your ninth place hitter.
As far as maintaining an optimistic outlook, Bautista (and I was very sour on him last year) had a very strong September and is looking good so far in spring training. He claims the coach's hitting philosophy has kicked in. Keeping the fingers crossed.Should be 9th in the lineup, but, it wouldn't surprise me if Cito bats him leadoff, at least to start the year.
He might make us forget Alex Rios or even Vernon Wells with his offensive numbers in 2010. Mind it is really difficult to underhit Alex.As far as maintaining an optimistic outlook, Bautista (and I was very sour on him last year) had a very strong September and is looking good so far in spring training.
Monday April 5th vs. TexasWhen is game one anyway?
Dye is regarded as one of the worst defensive OF in baseball. I think it is actually surprising no team has signed him, but honestly, if I were runing the Jays, I wouldn't spend the money on him. The Jays aren't close to challenge for the division with or without Dye, so I'd rather see them spend the money on sigining their draft picks, which they failed to do so with some guys last year, than spend the money on a veteran who won't propel the Jays to a playoff spot.Jermaine Dye is a pure right fielder (albeit with diminished defensive range) and, by all accounts an excellent leader and locker room guy. The Jays do not have a RF (Snider is - or should be - a left fielder) unless they play Bautista there every day, which I don't see being a good thing. They certainly need a veteran leadership presence - Doc's gone and I think it's obvious that Vernon Wells is not nor ever will be that for the Jays.
It's all talk and chances are Dye wants to play for a team that has a shot of contending, but I wouldn't discount it completely.
(And Randy Ruiz is 32 going on 33 - he is what he is, a utility power bat who can play 1B, DH and maybe LF.)
so are you saying Travis Snider would put up better #s than Dye?Dye is regarded as one of the worst defensive OF in baseball. I think it is actually surprising no team has signed him, but honestly, if I were runing the Jays, I wouldn't spend the money on him. The Jays aren't close to challenge for the division with or without Dye, so I'd rather see them spend the money on sigining their draft picks, which they failed to do so with some guys last year, than spend the money on a veteran who won't propel the Jays to a playoff spot.
Snider is the future and he's a damn sight cheaper than Dye would be.so are you saying Travis Snider would put up better #s than Dye?