If you go back to Questor's original post, if he had just left out the final sentence, I don't think anybody would've jumped on him. If he would've just left it at, "I don't think Tiger will catch Jack," that would've been his prediction, and that's fine. But when he ends by saying, "Jack will always be the greatest," with such ridiculous certainty, I think that was where the posters here took issue. Yes, Tiger's pace of major victories is slightly lower than it was a few years ago, but his overall victory pace is the same at just over 30%. Perhaps he won't catch Jack. Nobody's saying it's impossible that he won't. What we're saying is that when everything is taken into consideration, it's highly unlikely that he will not surpass the record, and concluding that Jack will always be the greatest is laughable.