Are you going to rip them off cars and say it’s not vandalism like you said about the pump stickers when they were being ripped off pumps?
Do you think it would be illegal to do so?
DoFo government admits new licence plates 'absolutely' a problem, will need to be rec
- Thread starter SaturnFan
- Start date
Do you think it would be illegal to do so?
I think after that whole explanation you have missed the point.
When I claimed he cleared cookies to access more free articles, he thought he did something illegal, so he changed his story and then claimed he was using a shared account.
Then changed his story again and said he was routinely cleaning his computer and by virtue of that he innocently had access to more free articles.
It’s about intent.
It’s about telling lies before even knowing what was legal or not.
But the intent was always to get something for free rather than pay for a subscription like others do.
Your wish is my command I guess:
From Toronto Star’s Terms of Use:
“You may not access parts of the Properties or Services which you are not authorized to access. You may not attempt to circumvent any restriction or condition imposed on your use or access, “
And you did say you were sharing an account:
“Accounts are offered for individual use only. Registration is strictly restricted to one account per person. You may not pretend to be someone else or register on behalf of other people.”
God knows what other terms you have discarded but you can look them up for yourself:
http://notices.torstar.com/main_terms_of_use_daily_and_community_brands_EN/
So I’ve given you proof and a link to that proof...from the internet (as you requested)
Anything else I can help you with?
Last edited:
Clearly indicates how you cannot comprehend the basics of what Pavel stated. You are like a child in a candy factory.
Again the cookies were not cleared. Jeez. It was the browsing history that these news media can track you. As Pavel indicated, the Toronto Star gets reimbursed by the Advertisers for I only clicking on the website to view the free articles. You think that this media are as gullible as you are??
See how your presumptions that "cleaning" the computer that most of us do to protect our ID and Security was supposed to be "intent" in your warped world!!
You are the biggest liar in the manner in which you has started threads with zero proof and then tried to defend a certain individual who was alleged to be selling illegal street hash and still insisting that there was "No proof" with this revelation by The Globe and Mail. You are making a clown out of yourself!!
No one is circumventing these restrictions. We do not have to keep tabs on the dates / months that we are logging in. If someone posts a Toronto Star link then I click on it, it is then not illegal, if it allows me to access the account.
By the way The Toronto star does not offer any more free articles.
Well, she rents my basement, so we live in the same house. But, if you think that a family who subscribes to such articles will get a subscription for each and every family member then you are living in denial. I do not read it on a religious basis but have access to it. Most of the time that I do, she is the one who is logged in anyway!!
But this is what would be of more concern to them, and we definitely do not fall in that bracket:
This is not about me living in denial about people sharing accounts. This is about attacking me and challenging me to find you proof that sharing an account is breaching what the Star's T&C's are. And I showed you.
Now you are trying to tell me about how you justify doing it based on your living arrangements with someone?
This is also not about someone sending you a link to an article and you clicking it and reading it.
This is about you purposely clearing your cookies/history to access an article you want to read having used up your free articles already. ie circumventing
This is also about you lying about it.
First it was about you clearing your cookies/history and saying there is nothing wrong with that.
Then you changed your story to using a shared account when I called you out on it.
He just might.
He is obsessively fixated on irrelevant minutiae.
Maybe it's the self-isolation... maybe it's more... you be the judge.
I know...I can't believe Bver is a thief either! And you defending him is also a surprise! Wow!
Says the guy who went out of his way to find and comb through the Toronto Star's paywall terms and conditions, only to fail repeatedly.
If you were paying attention...Bver demanded I present the Star's T&C's. He was too lazy to look at them himself...and you were too lazy to actually follow this thread before shooting your mouth off and looking like an idiot.
T&C's clearly proved what I have been saying...but you missed that part while tripping over yourself to try and come up with a witty response.
Maybe it’s a way of distracting himself from the virus and coping with his fear and anxiety?
Then again...Boober was like this before the covid19 outbreak.
Hmmmm...
You are sick in your mind by labelling someone as a "thief" for sharing the Toronto Star articles based on one subscription. Obviously you will think that numerous Canadians are thieves for doing the same with sites like Netflix etc, when they share it with those living in their households.
But keep on smoking that street hash from that individual who was outed by The Globe and Mail for selling it. Again you have not proven any "theft" but just your assumption to be an "intent". You need help!!
Again, clearing the History / cache is recommended even by The Government of Canada websites as well as all the banks. If you do not follow such basic procedures then you are silly to allege that others are doing it intentionally to "steal" those "free articles"!!
The only reason that the subscription is recommended for one person is because the personal information and credit card information etc are listed in the account. The account can only be used on one device at a time. So two of us cannot have access to it at the same time. Moreover though I have access to the account, I only read it when she is around, as I have numerous other accounts and other chores that I am involved in!!
If that information is shared then all this personal and cc info. etc can be compromised, and The Tor. Star could be held responsible for it. If I was a "thief" like you falsely allege then I could have stolen from that credit card information for my own benefit. Well you might as well go and police this fallacy of yours on the internet with Netflix and all the Online TV Providers. Yes Netflix has various types of subscriptions, but it is based on the number of devices that it can be used at the same time. If a family member lives in another city then technically, they cannot use that account, but that is not the case and Netflix does not clamp down on it!! Okay??
You are infatuated with me, and just keep on stalking me with such outrageous allegations, like labelling me as a "thief". Plain ignorance so get a life!!
He is just stalking me with such ridiculous allegations of I being a "thief". But he is the one that started a thread about Trudeau and his sexual assaults on students with no evidence. He kept on insisting that it was breaking news. But then denied ever starting that thread.
Another shenanigan is the fact that he came up with this myth that with the 4.4 cents carbon tax on gasoline, the prices at the grocery stores will rise by 40%. He insisted on it even though numerous others tried to explain that it was not the case. Such is his logic!!
He's got that much power over you, huh?
Hear that bver... you've got a little gopher at your beck and call.
haha the example you have provided is wrong as Netflix provides their subscription fee based on the number of devices used to access it and not by the number of people using it.
You asked me for proof, I gave you proof. You are in violation of the Star's terms & conditions. And now you are trying to distract again by providing the lame excuse "but others do it so it's ok"?
Are you serious?
Just admit it, you are wrong. You attempts to wiggle of of this are making you look like an idiot.
