DoFo government admits new licence plates 'absolutely' a problem, will need to be rec

[Boober69]

He's got that much power over you, huh?
Hear that bver... you've got a little gopher at your beck and call.

Not quite, he just made it easy to prove he was wrong. Now he's scrambling again and you condone theft as well.

My, my how you greedy leftists like it when everyone else pays for things you want. This is a case study on that fact.

Tell me, what things do you steal and/or expect someone else to pay for?

 

[Boober69]

Again, clearing the History / cache is recommended even by The Government of Canada websites as well as all the banks. If you do not follow such basic procedures then you are silly to allege that others are doing it intentionally to "steal" those "free articles"!!

The only reason that the subscription is recommended for one person is because the personal information and credit card information etc are listed in the account. The account can only be used on one device at a time. So two of us cannot have access to it at the same time. Moreover though I have access to the account, I only read it when she is around, as I have numerous other accounts and other chores that I am involved in!!

If that information is shared then all this personal and cc info. etc can be compromised, and The Tor. Star could be held responsible for it. If I was a "thief" like you falsely allege then I could have stolen from that credit card information for my own benefit. Well you might as well go and police this fallacy of yours on the internet with Netflix and all the Online TV Providers. Yes Netflix has various types of subscriptions, but it is based on the number of devices that it can be used at the same time. If a family member lives in another city then technically, they cannot use that account, but that is not the case and Netflix does not clamp down on it!! Okay??

You are infatuated with me, and just keep on stalking me with such outrageous allegations, like labelling me as a "thief". Plain ignorance so get a life!!

Their terms & conditions are clear: one subscription per person

I showed this to you when you cried about me lying about it.

It's in writing but you refuse to acknowledge you are in violation.

Why?

 

[Boober69]

Maybe it’s a way of distracting himself from the virus and coping with his fear and anxiety?

Then again...Boober was like this before the covid19 outbreak.

Hmmmm...

It's sport to me.
Proving someone's hypcrisy, catching them in lies, catching them breaking the law, etc., is something that I find entertaining while also the right thing to do.

I find if you push people like Bver, Frankfooter, apoptygma enough, they trip over thier own lies and hypocrisy and then their true colours come out. Leftists are usually the loudest when accusing others, but are usually doing worse things themselves.

I think exposing their behaviour is necessary. Consider it a public service.

You're welcome.

 

[Frankfooter]

It's sport to me.
Proving someone's hypcrisy, catching them in lies, catching them breaking the law, etc., is something that I find entertaining while also the right thing to do.

I find if you push people like Bver, Frankfooter, apoptygma enough, they trip over thier own lies and hypocrisy and then their true colours come out. Leftists are usually the loudest when accusing others, but are usually doing worse things themselves.

I think exposing their behaviour is necessary. Consider it a public service.

You're welcome.

Yet you never apologized for posting fake news about Trudeau.
What were you saying about hypocrisy?

 

[bver_hunter]

haha the example you have provided is wrong as Netflix provides their subscription fee based on the number of devices used to access it and not by the number of people using it.

You asked me for proof, I gave you proof. You are in violation of the Star's terms & conditions. And now you are trying to distract again by providing the lame excuse "but others do it so it's ok"?

Are you serious?

Just admit it, you are wrong. You attempts to wiggle of of this are making you look like an idiot.

Where does "violation" of terms automatically mean "theft"?? You have not shown as any proof that it is the case and making yourself look more ignorant with all your posts. All that the Star has it in their terms and conditions is for their own protection from illegal use of the credit card and other personal information. Also, they will not permit you to login into two different devices at the same time. They will have no problems with sharing their articles on a personal level in the same household, just like Netflix. Otherwise why will any Family member subscribe to it if they cannot share it with the rest of their family, just like Netflix?? Posting one's Login name and password on this site will be illegal.

So if my friend and tenant decides to subscribe to the newspaper and then shares it with me, what is the difference between sharing it online and sharing the actual newspaper?? Why does it amount to "theft" in your own mind boggling head when it is online, but not so if it is the actual newspaper itself?? You are the real ignorant one that does not know the meaning of theft and this simple comparison. First you accused me of "hacking" the Toronto Star's account. You did not know that meaning. You accused the PM of sexual assault on his students, yet no proof, or claiming that you were wrong there. Not to forget that your math regarding the carbon tax of 4.4 cents on gasoline amounts to "40%" rise in grocery prices. You did not admit that your calculations were pathetic. Yet you go on and on with your ignorant assumptions and constant accusations!!

 

[bver_hunter]

Yet you never apologized for posting fake news about Trudeau.
What were you saying about hypocrisy?

Not to forget his scaremongering about how the carbon tax of 4.4 cents at the pump will push up the prices at the grocery stores by up to"40%".

You can share your newspaper as it is "not theft", but if you share the same articles online then it is "theft". Boober's boo boo logic!!

 

[Boober69]

Where does "violation" of terms automatically mean "theft"?? You have not shown as any proof that it is the case and making yourself look more ignorant with all your posts. All that the Star has it in their terms and conditions is for their own protection from illegal use of the credit card and other personal information. Also, they will not permit you to login into two different devices at the same time. They will have no problems with sharing their articles on a personal level in the same household, just like Netflix. Otherwise why will any Family member subscribe to it if they cannot share it with the rest of their family, just like Netflix?? Posting one's Login name and password on this site will be illegal.

So if my friend and tenant decides to subscribe to the newspaper and then shares it with me, what is the difference between sharing it online and sharing the actual newspaper?? Why does it amount to "theft" in your own mind boggling head when it is online, but not so if it is the actual newspaper itself?? You are the real ignorant one that does not know the meaning of theft and this simple comparison. First you accused me of "hacking" the Toronto Star's account. You did not know that meaning. You accused the PM of sexual assault on his students, yet no proof, or claiming that you were wrong there. Not to forget that your math regarding the carbon tax of 4.4 cents on gasoline amounts to "40%" rise in grocery prices. You did not admit that your calculations were pathetic. Yet you go on and on with your ignorant assumptions and constant accusations!!

If you are too stupid to understand what theft is then that may explain why you do it.

If you are too stupid to realize that before you even mentioned anything about using a shared account, you said you gained access to free articles by clearing your computer. You need to lie better.

If you are going to attack someone by insisting they show you the terms & conditions, and then they do, and clearly point out that shared accounts are not permitted, but you just say "everyone is doing it" then you have no integrity and have lost the argument.



So not only are you a thief, you're a liar too.

 

[Boober69]

Not to forget his scaremongering about how the carbon tax of 4.4 cents at the pump will push up the prices at the grocery stores by up to"40%".

You can share your newspaper as it is "not theft", but if you share the same articles online then it is "theft". Boober's boo boo logic!!

Your example is flawed.
Online subscriptions offer convenience that physical newspapers do not. That's why media companies like the Star explicitly state that subscription accounts can not be shared. You are paying for that convenience and access. What part of that do you not understand?

Do you think they put that in their terms & conditions because they don't really mean it?

 

[Boober69]

Yet you never apologized for posting fake news about Trudeau.
What were you saying about hypocrisy?

I never created a fake news story. But let's get back on topic even though you are desperately trying to distract again..Why do you defend thieves? And why do you condone vandalism?

 

[apoptygma]

I never created a fake news story. But let's get back on topic even though you are desperately trying to distract again..Why do you defend thieves? And why do you condone vandalism?

Completely unrelated question, that I think you will ignore.
Ever do anything illegal?

 

[Frankfooter]

I never created a fake news story.

You posted it and claimed it was true for weeks and refused to admit it was fake news when the source was identified.

 

[bver_hunter]

If you are too stupid to understand what theft is then that may explain why you do it.

If you are too stupid to realize that before you even mentioned anything about using a shared account, you said you gained access to free articles by clearing your computer. You need to lie better.

If you are going to attack someone by insisting they show you the terms & conditions, and then they do, and clearly point out that shared accounts are not permitted, but you just say "everyone is doing it" then you have no integrity and have lost the argument.

Yes, I a perpetrator of fake news, and a liar too.

Fixed your post!

Again, I read all the free posts when they were offering it. Then when I cleared the history and cache after doing my online banking etc., that is when I discovered that more free articles were available after I clicked on a link from the Toronto Star that someone had posted. Is it my fault for stumbling on it WITHOUT INTENT.... No. So stop bullshitting and falsely alleging that it is "intentionally stealing"!!

Shortly after that, My tenant gave me access to her account. That account is only valid for one device at a time. Definitely, nothing to do with stealing. You live on another planet. Period!!

 

[bver_hunter]

Online subscriptions offer convenience that physical newspapers do not.

So it is okay to be free if you do not have that "Convenience" that an online account has?? Bahahahahahahaha. You are a clown.

That's why media companies like the Star explicitly state that subscription accounts can not be shared. You are paying for that convenience and access. What part of that do you not understand?

Then it can be printed by the subscriber and passed on to me........yes?? But not to be read online.....yes??

Do you think they put that in their terms & conditions because they don't really mean it?

Do you think that all the subscribers read every single term and conditions when they subscribe?? That is ridiculous!!
The T. Star could have Corporate Accounts for Businesses, and that can be shared with the employees.
But if they stipulate that the account is for one subscriber, as there are all the personal details like credit card information, and other private information, then they do not want it to be compromised by many others that are offered the shared account. It is solely for the subscribers own security!!
Importantly, only one device can use it, so that if it is shared then they can get complaints of not being able to access the articles etc. by the subscriber.
Plus if the account is accessed in another city or strange location, then the person trying to access it will be blocked and a code sent to the subscribers account in order to unblock it. The Toronto Star can be on the hook for it. They will not enforce it, even if they know that the accounts are shared within the same residence. I know that for a fact. So get a life!!

 

[Boober69]

Completely unrelated question, that I think you will ignore.
Ever do anything illegal?

The short answer is no.

And the question here isn't about whether people do illegal things or not; this is about Bver denying he has done something wrong, denying it, flip-flopping, and me proving him wrong.

If you are basing your thinking on "just because others do it, it's ok"...then go back through every one of your posts and rethink your responses.

 

[apoptygma]

The short answer is no.

What's the long answer?

 

[Frankfooter]

The short answer is no.

So you're just another lurker on this board trying to spread his puritanical ways?
Figures.

 

[Boober69]

What's the long answer?

It's a short answer because I don't recall ever doing something illegal.
Have you ever done anything illegal?

 

[Boober69]

So you're just another lurker on this board trying to spread his puritanical ways?
Figures.

Not really, I just like calling out hypocrites and proving them wrong. Everyone has a purpose right? That's mine.
What's your's?

 

[apoptygma]

It's a short answer because I don't recall ever doing something illegal.
Have you ever done anything illegal?

You don't recall... what a convenient answer.
Then why are you on a message board that revolves around illegal behaviour?
What brought you here?
I think you are lying.

 

[Frankfooter]

Not really, I just like calling out hypocrites and proving them wrong. Everyone has a purpose right? That's mine.
What's your's?

Your purpose is trolling, it appears.
You're a lurker, or a hypocrite here.
Neither is welcome.