Zelensky condemns NATO leaders (and I agree with him)

[HungSowel]

There is quite a bit of irony with the supply line getting fucked up leaving the Russian army starving and the encirclement of cities leaving the Ukrainian people starving.

 

[Frankfooter]

There is quite a bit of irony with the supply line getting fucked up leaving the Russian army starving and the encirclement of cities leaving the Ukrainian people starving.

Twitter is filled with a lot of convoy videos today.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1500811946483986432

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1500804993699528706

 

[mellowjello]

Ah, neutrality and realism, Putin apologists always hiding behind those. How's the pay comrade, or is it on a voluntary basis?
Speaking of propaganda, this is not about security, and nobody's attacking Russia or massing their armies to invade,
but keep repeating the big lies and they'll stick, Putin lives in the past and is still butt hurt and can't get over the collapse of the USSR.
You got one thing right, Ukraine will live and fight another day, they survived 2 butchers in the 20th century, they'll survive this gangster.

You want to condescend someone who is trying to understand the origins and present state of the problem while projecting your own emotional response. The historical facts contradict your opinion and a little investigation might give you a more rounded perspective.

 

[bver_hunter]

Latvia then. Small country, former USSR republic, lots of Russians (needed "protection"). You think U.S. will fight Putin their even though Latvia is a part of NATO? What's the difference?

Definitely if any of these countries are part of NATO, then there are troops and weapons of all sorts stationed in those nations. Any attempt to invade and kill the NATO forces will mean an out and out war. Do You expect NATO to just withdraw their troops then, even though these nations have signed up to be part of NATO?