Toronto Escorts

You Can’t Project Power When the World Knows You Are Weak

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
18,979
5,399
113
Lewiston, NY
Lol. You guys do understand do you not that that outside of kicking the snot out of the Iraq, (not exactly all the tough) the US hasn’t won anything since…..Vietnam? Afghanistan?

Personally don’t see it anyways. The US is decaying from within.
It's reality TV, bitcoin and all those f**king MAGA hats...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Not getting younger

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,576
2,478
113
It's reality TV, bitcoin and all those f**king MAGA hats...
Well, I would go further and suggest it’s a lot more. But yep, for lack of better words. American society is in a state of decay.

They can’t even get shit done, bills passed. Can’t agree on shit, find any middle ground.I might suggest Washington is dysfunctional. but it’s more. So much more, and so much worse.

fast forward another 10-20 years…
 
Last edited:

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,557
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
I get people complaining about US hegemony affecting other countries but do people really think that in the absence of US foreign interactions, other countries will be free?

Sorry but given a choice between the US pulling the strings vs. China or Russia, I think I'll stick with the US.
I think you are likely to find out.

The result of WWII was the west yilelded global defense to the US, the US took it and pushed globalization as an economic and political project. It largely worked. I see the US pulling back from that global security role, focusing more near shore (Mexico and Canada) and with well aligned states (Japan, S. Korea, Australia…) as the US becomes self sufficient in food, energy and raw materials. Mexico last month was the largest exporting country to the US, overtaking China for the first time - that is a sign of things to come.
 

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,576
2,478
113
I think you are likely to find out.

The result of WWII was the west yilelded global defense to the US, the US took it and pushed globalization as an economic and political project. It largely worked. I see the US pulling back from that global security role, focusing more near shore (Mexico and Canada) and with well aligned states (Japan, S. Korea, Australia…) as the US becomes self sufficient in food, energy and raw materials. Mexico last month was the largest exporting country to the US, overtaking China for the first time - that is a sign of things to come.
I won’t “dispute” that. :) not entirely. Was a time I thought not during my life. Now I’m not so sure. Think they will implode first. But who knows.

And ho knows what will happen over the next generation ( 15-20 years) or two. Certainly there will be other recessions, maybe as bad as 2008 other world events like Covid that shake the landscape.

Many have speculated for years, the next big one will be economic. Ask Japan how it went ( is going for them). The US imports, near everything that matters. Nor does it make anything anymore. And as far as oil goes. All anyone need to do is turn off the taps or have them burning through their reserves. Their military and their economy will grind to a halt.

Balance of Trade in the United States averaged -17.46 USD Billion from 1950 until 2023, reaching an all time high of 1.95 USD Billion in June of 1975 and a record low of -102.54 USD Billion in March of 2022
.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,557
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Well, I would go further and suggest it’s a lot more. But yep, for lack of better words. American society is in a state of decay.

They can’t even get shit done, bills passed. Can’t agree on shit, find any middle ground.I might suggest Washington is dysfunctional. but it’s more. So much more, and so much worse.

fast forward another 10-20 years…
Don’t confuse the country with its government, governments are simply inefficient ineffective parasitic organizations that feed on the country.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,557
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
I won’t “dispute” that. :) not entirely. Was a time I thought not during my life. Now I’m not so sure. Think they will implode first. But who knows.

And ho knows what will happen over the next generation ( 15-20 years) or two. Certainly there will be other recessions, maybe as bad as 2008 other world events like Covid that shake the landscape.

Many have speculated for years, the next big one will be economic. Ask Japan how it went ( is going for them). The US imports, near everything that matters. Nor does it make anything anymore. And as far as oil goes. All anyone need to do is turn off the taps or have them burning through their reserves. Their military and their economy will grind to a halt.

Balance of Trade in the United States averaged -17.46 USD Billion from 1950 until 2023, reaching an all time high of 1.95 USD Billion in June of 1975 and a record low of -102.54 USD Billion in March of 2022
.
Actually the US makes almost everything that actually matters. Energy, food, homes, cars. Yes the world is our sweatshop for lower value items, and yes we have BY FAR the largest consumer market so we import a lot of stuff. Chip making is being onshored or near Shored (Mexico), Mexico is now the largest exporter to the US and is a very strategic middle economy partner. Space X has put more payload in orbit than all other launch entities COMBINED, Tesla model Y is the #1 selling vehicle in the world.

Consumer Markets: (millions USD nominal)
United States18,526,973
European Union8,762,887
China6,804,921
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
30,595
55,228
113
My position is that it hasn't had to.
I agree, but I think there are a lot of people in the government who grew up in that moment and think any drop from that height is "the US failing" and are prone to over-reacting to that perception.
This is a danger.

US policy was always based on the idea of fighting 2 major regional conflicts at once while maintaining the current operational tempo (which is now just North Korea). But as time has moved on, the axises that pose a that to the US has declined. NATO has grown, the Rio Pact has grown, ties with India and Oceania have grown... The US has more military alliances now than it did then.

There are only 2 potential MRCs for the US to consider. If we take them at their absolute possible biggest, it's a unified Sino-Russian conflict involving North Korea and a conflict involving the Indian subcontinent, but the Indian subcontinent is unlikely to unify given the tensions there and ongoing US-India counter-Chinese relations. Pakistan is more likely to ally with China, but it's also weaker than India.

So really if the US can handle a China/Russia/Pakistan/North Korean alliance, it's set. And given that China has no official alliances and is now starting to distance itself militarily from Russia, even that seems unlikely.

Not to mention a generational technological advantage particularly in aviation (which is the most critical aspect of a modern military as I've explained before and which encompasses more than just aircraft; it's actually the vast majority of US military planning).
I don't disagree with your analysis on the military front.

The biggest threat to the US military right now is the GOP. Aside from them destroying it from within, the US military is as capable now compared to the state of the world as it was when the iron curtain came down.

That's my 2 cents anyway. I don't understand what you mean when you say it's "dominance at the international order" isn't what it was.
But I'm not talking about pure military power.
Dominance of the international order and the concept of hegemony isn't based on that.
 

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,762
113
But I'm not talking about pure military power.
Dominance of the international order and the concept of hegemony isn't based on that.
It largely is though. The ability to project power comes from military dominance.

Oil crosses the ocean in huge, slow ships. Trade goods cross the ocean in huge, slow ships. Grain and other food crosses the ocean in huge, slow ships. By and large, those ships are protected by the US Navy. Other nations help, sure, especially near their own shores, but it's largely the USN and the US population subsiding the protection of the oceans. Imagine they stopped doing that? Imagine they decided the entire world should cut off Cuba and actually worked to prevent Cuban trade with anyone? I have a lot of issues with America and Americans, but I have to acknowledge the good they do too.

There's a reason major embargoes are largely ineffectual unless the US is involved. While the general populations around the world don't acknowledge this and even sometimes complain about the US acting as world police, virtually the entire world benefits.

To me, in a discussion about power projection, the reality that the US commands the seas for the benefit of (almost) everyone, and can defeat even the largest alliances in the would tells me their hegemony is safe.

If you think they were stronger the day the wall feel, I can't see how. What power did they command then that they didn't command now?
 

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,576
2,478
113
1990.
Ross Perot was basically a harbinger for Trump. Why did he go nowhere..

Economically.
Countries like China and India weren’t as influential as they are today. In essence, US imports and trade imbalances, weren’t what they are today.

Walmart parking lots, weren’t full like they are today, because that’s what the dirty masses can afford.

no idea what the US spent on its military back then, let’s assume the same. The US, like us, is about to feel the weight of boomers. In labour markets and their exodus and impacts to gdp, , and in healthcare and other social niceties. I imagine ( don’t know) their ratio of boomers is higher.

Manufacturing was still viable, the rust belt didn’t exist.

GretaThunberg didn’t exist. Phasing out oil didn’t exist.

Remote work, like call centers in India didn’t exist.

And while the US has descreased military spending. Assuming the world and left wants to continue on such a path where everyone sings Kumbaya. At some point, the US military won’t be what it is. Which for all intents and purposes is a chained and handcuffed bear for show in a circus. Not a snowballs chance in hell, the American public will be ok, with taking the cuffs off.


lots of things have changed
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
86,181
19,873
113
It largely is though. The ability to project power comes from military dominance.

Oil crosses the ocean in huge, slow ships. Trade goods cross the ocean in huge, slow ships. Grain and other food crosses the ocean in huge, slow ships. By and large, those ships are protected by the US Navy. Other nations help, sure, especially near their own shores, but it's largely the USN and the US population subsiding the protection of the oceans. Imagine they stopped doing that? Imagine they decided the entire world should cut off Cuba and actually worked to prevent Cuban trade with anyone? I have a lot of issues with America and Americans, but I have to acknowledge the good they do too.

There's a reason major embargoes are largely ineffectual unless the US is involved. While the general populations around the world don't acknowledge this and even sometimes complain about the US acting as world police, virtually the entire world benefits.

To me, in a discussion about power projection, the reality that the US commands the seas for the benefit of (almost) everyone, and can defeat even the largest alliances in the would tells me their hegemony is safe.

If you think they were stronger the day the wall feel, I can't see how. What power did they command then that they didn't command now?
Though the embargoes have largely created two parrallel trade systems, Russia is still able to get enough manufacturing parts through China and others, Iran still sells oil.
No country has the power, it appears, to invade and hold a country anymore. Even the best the US could do is invade and turn Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan into failed states. Given those fights weren't about taking down countries that had the power to invade and more likely about goods controls all it did was take them out of the markets and leave them to foster guerilla fighters.

I would also wonder how long the US could get by without Chinese imports and how long China can get by without exports. Russia being an example, even with the oil exports they are ruining their economy.
Ukraine may have also changed the nature of war, with the power of drones taking over from air forces.

The next few years will also be interesting with food exports, already we are seeing crop failure everywhere and that will make some places more desparate.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,557
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
It largely is though. The ability to project power comes from military dominance.

Oil crosses the ocean in huge, slow ships. Trade goods cross the ocean in huge, slow ships. Grain and other food crosses the ocean in huge, slow ships. By and large, those ships are protected by the US Navy. Other nations help, sure, especially near their own shores, but it's largely the USN and the US population subsiding the protection of the oceans. Imagine they stopped doing that? Imagine they decided the entire world should cut off Cuba and actually worked to prevent Cuban trade with anyone? I have a lot of issues with America and Americans, but I have to acknowledge the good they do too.

There's a reason major embargoes are largely ineffectual unless the US is involved. While the general populations around the world don't acknowledge this and even sometimes complain about the US acting as world police, virtually the entire world benefits.

To me, in a discussion about power projection, the reality that the US commands the seas for the benefit of (almost) everyone, and can defeat even the largest alliances in the would tells me their hegemony is safe.

If you think they were stronger the day the wall feel, I can't see how. What power did they command then that they didn't command now?
This is exactly right.

I’d say the US love affair with globalization is over, China is no longer cheap and they’ve proved to be not worthy of trust. The US is in the process of re/near shoring its supply chain to more reliable partners in Mexico and Europe. The Saudi’s are shopping for a new security guarantor as the US has lost interest in Middle East energy production, that will expand as the US more tightly focuses it’s supply chain and has fewer trading routs to protect. Who will protect oil shipments from the ME to China?
 

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,576
2,478
113
Who can predict what China will or won’t do, if as or when, various things change. They are the elephant and wild card.

And if the US ( and others stop trading with China. Who is going to fill Walmart shelves, make widgets) . At a price point a whole lot of people can handle? Back around 2000 shopping at Walmart had a stigma. Today, the parking lots are crammed.
 

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,576
2,478
113
Actually the US makes almost everything that actually matters. Energy, food, homes, cars. Yes the world is our sweatshop for lower value items, and yes we have BY FAR the largest consumer market so we import a lot of stuff. Chip making is being onshored or near Shored (Mexico), Mexico is now the largest exporter to the US and is a very strategic middle economy partner. Space X has put more payload in orbit than all other launch entities COMBINED, Tesla model Y is the #1 selling vehicle in the world.

Consumer Markets: (millions USD nominal)
United States18,526,973
European Union8,762,887
China6,804,921
That explains your trade imbalances:)

For 2022, the goods and services deficit was $948.1 billion, up $103.0 billion from $845.0 billion in 2021. Exports were $3,009.7 billion, up $453.1 billion from 2021. Imports were $3,957.8 billion, up $556.1 billion from 2021.Feb 7, 2023
“cars” who makes various components.Did Covid not teach you anything? Can tell you some years ago I did some work for a company in aluminum extrusion. You be surprised what came from the east on container ships

.

See also
Full year 2022 total and finished steel imports were 30,832,000 and 25,249,000 NT, down 2.0% and up 10.9%, respectively, vs. 2021. Finished steel import market share was an estimated 23% in December and is estimated at 24% for full year 2022

see also Aluminum

luckily you have us for lumber.
Where does us get most of its timber?
However, the U.S. also imports approximately $4.5 billion worth of softwood lumber from Canada, accounting for 83% of total softwood lumber imports by value. That's over ten times as much as the U.S. exports to other countries.
 
Last edited:

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,557
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,557
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
That explains your trade imbalances:)



“cars” who makes various components.Did Covid not teach you anything? Can tell you some years ago I did some work for a company in aluminum extrusion. You be surprised what came from the east on container ships

.

See also
Full year 2022 total and finished steel imports were 30,832,000 and 25,249,000 NT, down 2.0% and up 10.9%, respectively, vs. 2021. Finished steel import market share was an estimated 23% in December and is estimated at 24% for full year 2022

see also Aluminum

luckily you have us for lumber.
Where does us get most of its timber?
However, the U.S. also imports approximately $4.5 billion worth of softwood lumber from Canada, accounting for 83% of total softwood lumber imports by value. That's over ten times as much as the U.S. exports to other countries.
The size of our consumer market does explain our net imports.

COVID and China have kicked off a re/nearshoring focus, Canada is part of that as a trusted partner.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,557
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Who can predict what China will or won’t do, if as or when, various things change. They are the elephant and wild card.

And if the US ( and others stop trading with China. Who is going to fill Walmart shelves, make widgets) . At a price point a whole lot of people can handle? Back around 2000 shopping at Walmart had a stigma. Today, the parking lots are crammed.
Mexico is now cheaper than China and has surpassed (last month) China as the largest importer to the US.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
12,771
1,809
113
Ghawar
India, US, Australia, Japan and Taiwan.
China needs protection of its ME oil supply against only one of
them who happens to be the only protector they can turn to. It
will be like having to pay the Mafia for protection.
 

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,576
2,478
113
US / China trade.

let this sink in.
U.S. export totaled $153.8 billion, an increase of 1.6% ($2.4 billion) from 2021; U.S. imports from China totaled $536.8 billion, an increase of 6.3% ($31.8 billion); and the trade deficit with China was $382.9 billion, an increase of 8.3% of ($29.4 billion
Let’s assume both countries distenagle. You think China is just going to do nothing to replace the $$. And what will American consumers think about much higher price points. And what makes you think “Mexico” can handle so much in exports…and pick up the slack per se.


.

US / Mexico
U.S. goods and services trade with Mexico totaled an estimated $677.3 billion in 2019. Exports were $289.5 billion; imports were
So you have a 400b deficit with Mexico and a 500b deficit with China


I thought you were self sufficient?
The United States trade balance moved from positive to negative in the 1970s and has remained negative since then
 

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,762
113
Though the embargoes have largely created two parrallel trade systems, Russia is still able to get enough manufacturing parts through China and others, Iran still sells oil.
If the US wanted to let nothing through, they could. It would involve violating airspace and waters, so they've never done it. But they could. I'm talking a full on siege of an entire nation. It's only ever been done with countries the US was at war with. When it was invading Iraq, nothing got in or out except small items in small quantities smuggled by car or donkey.

No country has the power, it appears, to invade and hold a country anymore.
The occupation is definitely the problem when nations care about human rights. Kill them all, then either salt the earth or enslave/imprison everyone and move on your own settlers still works as well as it ever did. But most nations aren't able or willing to do that. But when the US can tear down the 4th largest military in the world in 44 days and completely dismantle it, it demonstrates no one poses a real threat. No other military in the would has the power to move that much force around the world. Russia can't even get across a land border, let alone cross the ocean.

I would also wonder how long the US could get by without Chinese imports and how long China can get by without exports. Russia being an example, even with the oil exports they are ruining their economy.
Only a problem on a democracy, which is the biggest weakness Western nations have always had, and why in time of real war, some suspend it. In WWII, the British Empire essentially pulled an Ancient Rome by appointing a dictator and suspending elections. In places where that didn't happen, usually support wasn't as strong. Canada was a perfect example. It wasn't just our shit commander for the first half, our government and electoral process tied our hands.

You might want to look into the now-defunct SIOP. They studied this. 5 years to retrain people to be manufactories and labourers for a wartime/rebuilding economy that's not dependent on anyone, 20 years to rebuild the economy, 10 years to retrain people away from a wartime economy. If you can keep your population in check for those 35 years and not in rebellion, you win. Can they? Almost certainly not. But neither can anyone else.

Ukraine may have also changed the nature of war, with the power of drones taking over from air forces.
And which nation leads in the use, production, and logistics of military drones by as huge margin?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts