Interesting comments....
----------------------
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080829.wcowent30/BNStory/specialComment
1.
John Mueller from Milton, Ontario, Canada writes: As I near retirement I've been teaching on contract for one of the community colleges. Seeing first-hand the end product of the secondary school system is certainly an eye-opener for me! I see 18/19 yr-olds who can't add fractions (e.g., what's 1-3/8" 1/2"?), calculate the area of a circle, or write a coherent paragraph. Forget basic physics, chemistry, or simple Canadian history knowledge. It is as if they never even went to secondary school! And the problem of not knowing how to deal with a deadline or the concept of failure is quite shocking. After 33-yrs in industry it seems that we college instructors are the last line of defence before these people hit the real world. The key problem, in my opinion, is the skewed view of the world that is propagated by a school system where very few of the administrators or teachers have ever worked out side of the educational system. Unfortunately I don't believe that it is all that different at the universities (I've been working on a degree part-time too and see the performance of the students and professors in this environment too.) Kids, go to a college and learn from experienced instructors about how the real world works _before_ you find out the hard way that your first boss won’t put up with this BS.
* Posted 30/08/08 at 3:34 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
3.
Veronica L from Canada writes: I teach English at a college, and my experience with first year students is very similar to John Mueller's. Students who can't write a complete sentence are horrified when they get Fs and invariably tell me that they got As in high school. Students who have been warned repeatedly that if they don't show up for a test they will get not get another chance to make it up skip it anyway and are shocked when they get zeros. (One girl ran crying from my office, telling she was going to talk to the "principal"). Students who have had the consequences of plagiarism explained to them nevertheless still hand in copied work and are angry when told that they are going to be reported. Thanks in part to the poor preparation they received in high school, many of these students (up to one third of a class sometimes) will flunk out.
* Posted 30/08/08 at 4:57 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
8.
Another Opinion from Toronto, Canada writes: Do you mind if I print this out? I keep telling my friends that their kids are quite clearly stupid, but they keep insisting that they do well in school. Finally, I can point out that doing well in school has nothing to do with intelligence. In fact, doing well in school has pretty much nothing to do with reality.
No wonder kids these days keep living with their parents for years. They don't understand that holding down a job means showing up and doing your work!
* Posted 30/08/08 at 8:09 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
9.
Paul Wallnutz from Ontario, Canada writes: John Mueller, from Milton writes: "After 33-yrs in industry it seems that we college instructors are the last line of defence before these people hit the real world. The key problem, in my opinion, is the skewed view of the world that is propagated by a school system where very few of the administrators or teachers have ever worked out side of the educational system. Unfortunately I don't believe that it is all that different at the universities..."
John, you are bang on there. I've working in engineering project management and we see the problems our new-grad engineers. I agree that the university professors and all school educators should have to spend a few years in the real world where they would realize how this sort of no-failure and no-deadline world isn't reality.
* Posted 30/08/08 at 8:59 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
11.
D. Armstrong from London, Canada writes: As a former teacher - who quit teaching after ten years of watching these sorts of problems - let me just say that much of this reflects the type of society that Canada has evolved into. Nobody wants to be the 'bad guy' anymore. There are no meaningful consequences for bad behaviour in elementary or secondary school and, in many places the worst kids are effectively running the school! This has become worse because boards of education hire administrators who will not rock the boat. Superintendents are more interested in being 'politically correct' than they are in fighting with idiotic parents who, of course, have raised undiscipliined children. The key point here is that there are many great, potential vice-principals and principals in any school system - but they would rock the boat too much if they were hired. Rocking the boat, in this case, would mean setting limits, enforcing the rules, and sticking to their guns! As such, few really good vice-principals get hired. It's not about teachers getting more 'real world' experience. It's about recognizing the good ones and promoting them. Not so ironically, most teachers love their students; and so not all of them are very well qualified for administration as they are incapable of being the 'bad guy'. We need to do three things. First, educational theorists and superintendents must supply-teach so that they do not become completely dissociated from the 'real world' of the school. Second, we need to hire the right type of vice-principal in the first place. As well, most schools need at least one more V.P. than they actually have. Right now, there are far too many problems in most schools - and not enough V.P.s to chase everyone down. Finally, we need a debate on what should constitute effective discipline in our schools. A province-wide, enforcable code of conduct, clearly spelling out consequences for poor behaviour etc. would go a long way toward helping maintain acceptable standards.
14.
w b from Canada writes: Hello,
I would like to touch on two things noted above. First, I have been teaching for about 6 years at the high school level. This slow decrease in holding students responsible has been hard to handle. It is true that students now can show up when they want, hand in poor work, no work, skip classes, tests, and make everything up later. All the students know this (some even have it planned out).
Teachers in my area are starting to voice their concern. I have seen kids graduate who can not spell, do math, read, etc.... If the kids fail they go to Credit Recovery, or do Online courses, or, and another or, which means nothing.
This is scary due to those who are "getting A's" are not getting what used to be an "A". I have been just blown away with how many of our "A" students who can not write, reference, etc...go to university and pass?
It is a double whammy - High school Diploma means nothing, - A University Degree - will be our new high school diploma.
Everyone will soon need a masters or PhD to prove their worth.
* Posted 30/08/08 at 10:41 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
19.
K M from Ottawa, Canada writes: Has anyone ever read the short story "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut Jr.? If not, I would highly recommend it.
The tendency in Ontario, if not Canada as a whole, seems to be to move toward "equality". A fine, noble ideal: "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights," to quote the 1941 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But somewhere along the line, we have confused equality of "dignity and rights" with equality of ability and a right to success.
The hard, uncomfortable, truth is that we are not all equal. Some excel at sports, others at mathmatics or English. Still others are gifted leaders or teachers. But no matter the level of success a person achieves in his field of study, there are other areas IN WHICH HE HAS FAILED. The ability to overcome difficulty, disappointment and disillusionment is the true mesure of a man, not academic success.
By not allowing today's children to experience this aspect of life out of a misguided fear of "harming their psyche", we are eroding the character of tomorrow's leaders. We are leaving our children and our children's children to face the world of Harrison Bergeron, in which the exceptional or gifted person is shackled with artificial "handicaps" to "equalize" them and bring them down to the level of the average man.
This practice has already been used, unconsciously, in Ontario Public School for at least a decade. The problem is silent, insidious and seemingly innocuous. But if no one is allowed to excel, progress slows, then ceases altogether. New technologies are not invented; old ones fall into disuse. No cures are found for devastating diseases; no progress is made in treatment. Gradually, society regresses to the point that today's lifestyle seems no more than a pipe dream. The old people, who still remember Western society in the early days of its decline, lament,
"Why were we never allowed to fail?"
* Posted 30/08/08 at 11:13 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
----------------------
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080829.wcowent30/BNStory/specialComment
1.
John Mueller from Milton, Ontario, Canada writes: As I near retirement I've been teaching on contract for one of the community colleges. Seeing first-hand the end product of the secondary school system is certainly an eye-opener for me! I see 18/19 yr-olds who can't add fractions (e.g., what's 1-3/8" 1/2"?), calculate the area of a circle, or write a coherent paragraph. Forget basic physics, chemistry, or simple Canadian history knowledge. It is as if they never even went to secondary school! And the problem of not knowing how to deal with a deadline or the concept of failure is quite shocking. After 33-yrs in industry it seems that we college instructors are the last line of defence before these people hit the real world. The key problem, in my opinion, is the skewed view of the world that is propagated by a school system where very few of the administrators or teachers have ever worked out side of the educational system. Unfortunately I don't believe that it is all that different at the universities (I've been working on a degree part-time too and see the performance of the students and professors in this environment too.) Kids, go to a college and learn from experienced instructors about how the real world works _before_ you find out the hard way that your first boss won’t put up with this BS.
* Posted 30/08/08 at 3:34 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
3.
Veronica L from Canada writes: I teach English at a college, and my experience with first year students is very similar to John Mueller's. Students who can't write a complete sentence are horrified when they get Fs and invariably tell me that they got As in high school. Students who have been warned repeatedly that if they don't show up for a test they will get not get another chance to make it up skip it anyway and are shocked when they get zeros. (One girl ran crying from my office, telling she was going to talk to the "principal"). Students who have had the consequences of plagiarism explained to them nevertheless still hand in copied work and are angry when told that they are going to be reported. Thanks in part to the poor preparation they received in high school, many of these students (up to one third of a class sometimes) will flunk out.
* Posted 30/08/08 at 4:57 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
8.
Another Opinion from Toronto, Canada writes: Do you mind if I print this out? I keep telling my friends that their kids are quite clearly stupid, but they keep insisting that they do well in school. Finally, I can point out that doing well in school has nothing to do with intelligence. In fact, doing well in school has pretty much nothing to do with reality.
No wonder kids these days keep living with their parents for years. They don't understand that holding down a job means showing up and doing your work!
* Posted 30/08/08 at 8:09 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
9.
Paul Wallnutz from Ontario, Canada writes: John Mueller, from Milton writes: "After 33-yrs in industry it seems that we college instructors are the last line of defence before these people hit the real world. The key problem, in my opinion, is the skewed view of the world that is propagated by a school system where very few of the administrators or teachers have ever worked out side of the educational system. Unfortunately I don't believe that it is all that different at the universities..."
John, you are bang on there. I've working in engineering project management and we see the problems our new-grad engineers. I agree that the university professors and all school educators should have to spend a few years in the real world where they would realize how this sort of no-failure and no-deadline world isn't reality.
* Posted 30/08/08 at 8:59 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
11.
D. Armstrong from London, Canada writes: As a former teacher - who quit teaching after ten years of watching these sorts of problems - let me just say that much of this reflects the type of society that Canada has evolved into. Nobody wants to be the 'bad guy' anymore. There are no meaningful consequences for bad behaviour in elementary or secondary school and, in many places the worst kids are effectively running the school! This has become worse because boards of education hire administrators who will not rock the boat. Superintendents are more interested in being 'politically correct' than they are in fighting with idiotic parents who, of course, have raised undiscipliined children. The key point here is that there are many great, potential vice-principals and principals in any school system - but they would rock the boat too much if they were hired. Rocking the boat, in this case, would mean setting limits, enforcing the rules, and sticking to their guns! As such, few really good vice-principals get hired. It's not about teachers getting more 'real world' experience. It's about recognizing the good ones and promoting them. Not so ironically, most teachers love their students; and so not all of them are very well qualified for administration as they are incapable of being the 'bad guy'. We need to do three things. First, educational theorists and superintendents must supply-teach so that they do not become completely dissociated from the 'real world' of the school. Second, we need to hire the right type of vice-principal in the first place. As well, most schools need at least one more V.P. than they actually have. Right now, there are far too many problems in most schools - and not enough V.P.s to chase everyone down. Finally, we need a debate on what should constitute effective discipline in our schools. A province-wide, enforcable code of conduct, clearly spelling out consequences for poor behaviour etc. would go a long way toward helping maintain acceptable standards.
14.
w b from Canada writes: Hello,
I would like to touch on two things noted above. First, I have been teaching for about 6 years at the high school level. This slow decrease in holding students responsible has been hard to handle. It is true that students now can show up when they want, hand in poor work, no work, skip classes, tests, and make everything up later. All the students know this (some even have it planned out).
Teachers in my area are starting to voice their concern. I have seen kids graduate who can not spell, do math, read, etc.... If the kids fail they go to Credit Recovery, or do Online courses, or, and another or, which means nothing.
This is scary due to those who are "getting A's" are not getting what used to be an "A". I have been just blown away with how many of our "A" students who can not write, reference, etc...go to university and pass?
It is a double whammy - High school Diploma means nothing, - A University Degree - will be our new high school diploma.
Everyone will soon need a masters or PhD to prove their worth.
* Posted 30/08/08 at 10:41 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
19.
K M from Ottawa, Canada writes: Has anyone ever read the short story "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut Jr.? If not, I would highly recommend it.
The tendency in Ontario, if not Canada as a whole, seems to be to move toward "equality". A fine, noble ideal: "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights," to quote the 1941 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But somewhere along the line, we have confused equality of "dignity and rights" with equality of ability and a right to success.
The hard, uncomfortable, truth is that we are not all equal. Some excel at sports, others at mathmatics or English. Still others are gifted leaders or teachers. But no matter the level of success a person achieves in his field of study, there are other areas IN WHICH HE HAS FAILED. The ability to overcome difficulty, disappointment and disillusionment is the true mesure of a man, not academic success.
By not allowing today's children to experience this aspect of life out of a misguided fear of "harming their psyche", we are eroding the character of tomorrow's leaders. We are leaving our children and our children's children to face the world of Harrison Bergeron, in which the exceptional or gifted person is shackled with artificial "handicaps" to "equalize" them and bring them down to the level of the average man.
This practice has already been used, unconsciously, in Ontario Public School for at least a decade. The problem is silent, insidious and seemingly innocuous. But if no one is allowed to excel, progress slows, then ceases altogether. New technologies are not invented; old ones fall into disuse. No cures are found for devastating diseases; no progress is made in treatment. Gradually, society regresses to the point that today's lifestyle seems no more than a pipe dream. The old people, who still remember Western society in the early days of its decline, lament,
"Why were we never allowed to fail?"
* Posted 30/08/08 at 11:13 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment






