You forget about stealing cricket from the Brits.I already told you. We devised this plan right when you were born, and have now installed an Indian PM in UK. Its all coming together. The goal is to move 50% of India's population to Canada by 2050.
What would the world look like if Europeans had colonized Saudia Arabia?
- Thread starter dirtyharry555
- Start date
FWIW: If
ChatGPT
There are a few reasons why Saudi Arabia was not colonized by the British or the French like many other countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. One major reason is that the Arabian Peninsula is a vast, desert region that is difficult to traverse and control. Additionally, the region was largely inhospitable to outsiders, and the Bedouin tribes that inhabited the region were fiercely independent and resistant to outside control.Another reason is that the region was not rich in resources that were highly valued by the British or French at the time, such as oil. The discovery of oil in the region only came much later in the 20th century, so the British and French had little incentive to try to conquer and control the region.Finally, it is important to note that the Ottoman Empire controlled much of the region until the end of World War I, and the British and French were more focused on gaining control of territories that had previously been under Ottoman control, such as Egypt and Palestine.
www.quora.com
ChatGPT
There are a few reasons why Saudi Arabia was not colonized by the British or the French like many other countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. One major reason is that the Arabian Peninsula is a vast, desert region that is difficult to traverse and control. Additionally, the region was largely inhospitable to outsiders, and the Bedouin tribes that inhabited the region were fiercely independent and resistant to outside control.Another reason is that the region was not rich in resources that were highly valued by the British or French at the time, such as oil. The discovery of oil in the region only came much later in the 20th century, so the British and French had little incentive to try to conquer and control the region.Finally, it is important to note that the Ottoman Empire controlled much of the region until the end of World War I, and the British and French were more focused on gaining control of territories that had previously been under Ottoman control, such as Egypt and Palestine.
Why wasn't Saudi Arabia colonized by the British or the French like the rest of the countries in the MENA region?
Answer (1 of 8): A few years ago, I was meeting a good friend in the sand dunes outside Abu Dhabi. I had been driving in an off-road convoy, but it was my birthday and my friend wanted to meet up and celebrate. They were in another lifted off-road truck, I was in my lifted FJ Cruiser, with proper...
We gave that to them along with their common language and system of government and their legal system. (although they don't use it so's you'd notice)
Also, lets not act like the middle-east was some push over region. Europe is actually lucky the Muslims didn't colonize them.
The Muslims got as far as the Gates of Vienna.
Colonization is actually a result of Europe being scared of the middle east. The muslim's wouldn't allow them to establish trade routes to India.
The Muslims were well on their way to conquering all of India until they were defeated by the Sikhs. Estimates of Indians slaughtered by the invaders range from 80mm to 280mm to 400mm.
Most Authentic History of Attacks on India from 636 AD: Hindus Killed in Millions (myindiamyglory.com)
What would the world look like if Europeans had colonized Saudia Arabia?
Much of the Earth would be desert, and the global population today would be about 500 million, many living underground. All of the oil would have been used up by the 1940's, and global warming would have started 100 years earlier. Sea levels would be ten feet higher. The atmosphere would be starting to clear, after the population implosion. There would still be only six teams in the NHL.
Much of the Earth would be desert, and the global population today would be about 500 million, many living underground. All of the oil would have been used up by the 1940's, and global warming would have started 100 years earlier. Sea levels would be ten feet higher. The atmosphere would be starting to clear, after the population implosion. There would still be only six teams in the NHL.
You're talking about the people who can't spend 2-3 hours in the sun without their skin burning? 
There would be a lot of homeless Arabs in London, England, which would be the Capital city of Earth, with Beijing-like smog in the form of fog. Locals would refer to them as "lazy Sauds".
It would rain there all of the time, like in Bladerunner, instead of most of the time. Canada would have a puppet government, controlled by big business, the same as now.
It would rain there all of the time, like in Bladerunner, instead of most of the time. Canada would have a puppet government, controlled by big business, the same as now.
We gave you your Common language. Legal system. Parliamentary system. Try to keep up.Who is "we"? Your country still belongs to someone else across the pond.
Regardless, you shouldn't have a problem then with us bringing freedom right back to Canada. The same way we brought it back to the UK with our Indian PM
That seems like a much overlooked chapter of history, unless you are Indian. How much bad blood still exists between India and the Muslim world?....Kautilya? I know older Brits are still pissed at Germany, and what they did is a fart in the wind by comparison.
We? You were part of the administration of the John Company or the Raj? Or is it that you feel the need to gain status because your ancestors were from the same chunk of land that did something a few centuries back.
p.s. India had well established systems of law and structure long before the Brits showed up. It was just many states instead of the current 1 (or 3).
There's a little bit of tongue in cheek going on in this thread. Maybe a little too subtle or something for you to figure it out. Don't take political discussions on a pooning forum too literally . I'm not really Robert Mugabe. You do get that don't you?
Yeah, now I see the 'subtlety' of trying to take credit for something that has nothing to do with you simply because you have English ancestors.
