In which country did 400,000 white men die in a civil war to end slavery?
The United States.
The United States.
Ah yes, the old "Model Minority" response. Please, tell me where you get the actual data to actually prove Asians are far smarter/motivated? Is this merely self-reinforcing opinion? Please feel free to search for information backing up those NYTs & Atlantic article that those on Reddit LOVE to post...Okay, but factor in that those Indian-Americans are first or second generation immigrants who self-select and self-qualify to come to the US. So you get far smarter, far more motivated examples than the majority of the population in their home country.
That's why immigrant populations will always score more highly on several indicators than the population in their chosen country of arrival or their original home country.
Ah yes, the old "Model Minority" response. Please, tell me where you get the data to actually prove Asians are far smarter/motivated? Is this merely self-reinforcing opinion?
A Macleans article is not data. We are no longer in High School....Maclean’s asks if U of T is “too Asian”
Apparently, the arrival of excellent students is a problem in Canada’s universities. The 20th edition of Maclean’s University Guide issue hits newsstandstorontolife.com
The fact is that china has a pool 1,000,000,000 people Which means the top 1% are 10 milion Which means go agsinst the top 33% in canada. Even if both groups are done The same in producing smart people Canadians don't have a chance.
You always did not read article. McLean is the only 1 who keeps that on the matter. Uoft will not reveal the data.A Macleans article is not data. We are no longer in High School....
I know right?I'm actually surprised we rank above Koreans![]()
Well shit, you just need to walk around real universities like the University of Waterloo to see the racial make-ups. However, one has no idea if they're foreign students, 1st, 2nd, 3rd generation immigrants. I'm white, 2nd generation and one of my 3rd generations kids go there with a program that has a 98% entrance hurdle. Mind you, it might have been reverse Affirmative Action tokenism, whatever, I'll take it.You always did not read article. McLean is the only 1 who keeps that on the matter. Uoft will not reveal the data.
Agreed, and all good data. HOWEVER, your main point was ...immigrants. Just because they're Asian doesn't necessarily mean they're immigrants and thus must succeed.You always did not read article. McLean is the only 1 who keeps that on the matter. Uoft will not reveal the data.
However the UK does not keep the secret And well not as multicultural as Canada
we get
The data shows that:
- in 2021, 72.1% of pupils from the Chinese ethnic group got a higher education place in the UK – the highest entry rate out of all ethnic groups
- 33.3% of white pupils got a higher education place – the lowest entry rate
- pupils from the Chinese ethnic group had the highest entry rate every year between 2006 and 2021
- white pupils had the lowest entry rate between 2007 and 2021
- in 2021, the entry rates for all ethnic groups were higher than in the previous year – they were also higher than in 2006 (the first year covered by this data)
- between 2006 and 2021, black pupils had the biggest entry rate increase out of all ethnic groups, from 21.6% to 48.6%
- white pupils had the smallest increase, from 21.8% to 33.3%
![]()
Entry rates into higher education
In 2022, the black ethnic group was the only group whose entry rates into higher education were higher than in 2021.www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk
All or almost all Asians have "Tiger Moms".Case in point; Old data but still likely valid. Asians at below the poverty level ($20K) drastically outperform many races who have 3x to 10x the income. Think about that. Poverty level do better than the rich. Do you think they are genetic supermen or perhaps they retain the culture that we used to have, that anyone can have, that values hard work instead of "chase your dreams" or "do what you like".
There is no must. Immigrants have huge barriers. Cost is 5-10 times to start. Language in cultural issues next.Agreed, and all good data. HOWEVER, your main point was ...immigrants. Just because they're Asian doesn't necessarily mean they're immigrants and thus must succeed.
Empirically, most - including me - would say that Asian students are observed to work far harder. That aside, I don't say what you claim. I say that immigrants as a whole are more motivated and smarter than the majority of their home country population. THAT'S why they're immigrants. Lazy dumb people don't emigrate.Ah yes, the old "Model Minority" response. Please, tell me where you get the actual data to actually prove Asians are far smarter/motivated? Is this merely self-reinforcing opinion? Please feel free to search for information backing up those NYTs & Atlantic article that those on Reddit LOVE to post...
"That's why immigrant populations will always score more highly on several indicators "
Really? All immigrants? Always? Just because they're immigrants? The Hmong among the Vietnamese? Spanish-Mexicans? Indians from the south as well as the north? Pakistani Asians? As you're well aware, the data shows there is a very wide disparity amongst and within immigrant groups and assuming merely someone is an immigrant does not necessarily mean the automatically score highly...or is this merely bias hidden behind 'inclusivity'?
Could contribute, sure.Do you think perhaps it's where non-whites are located (cities) where salaries are much higher versus the large number of whites that are located in more poor/ rural areas perhaps that skews the numbers? Nah...inconvenient data sampling goes against the prevailing orthodoxy right?
But these factors are affected by culture as well. Right?Maybe it's the rate of crimes committed (lots of data by race). Graduation rates. Perhaps the rates of two parent families - there is lots of data by race AND by income. The rich stay married and the poor divorce. These are all very very big factors that determine wealth.
Am I not actually saying this?Essentially, this model minority siren call is crap dreamt up by those who want to make excuses for lazy whites - and others - who have a sense of entitlement and feel they no longer work for it.
THE most important factor is culture. Culture matters. Crime rates, marriage rates, graduation rates. All matter much more than being 'an immigrant'.
Russia's off. They may have ended "slavery" in 1723, but serfdom persisted until 1862. Serfdom was of course the primary form of actual forced servitude in Russia until its abolition.
I did not know that slavery was legal in somebody places in the last hundred years.
When looking this up this is what I found
- In the United States, slavery was officially abolished with the passage of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865, but discrimination and racial inequality persisted in the form of Jim Crow laws and practices.
- In South Africa, the system of racial segregation and oppression known as apartheid was in place from 1948 to 1994.
- In India, the caste system, which has been described as a form of "hidden slavery," persisted into the 20th century and continues to affect millions of people today.
- In the early 20th century, forced labor was used in many colonies of European powers, and in some cases, it was used in concentration camps.
- In the Soviet Union, forced labor was used extensively during the Stalin era for industrialization and construction of infrastructure, especially during the period of the Great Purge from 1936 to 1938, where millions of people were arrested, sent to labor camps and executed.
No mention of the African slavery Still legal in 1960
Between 1912 and 1956, Morocco was the French protectorate in Morocco, which effectively ended the open slave trade in Morocco. In 1923 the French colonial authorities officially banned the slave trade and closed the slave markets in Morocco.[23] While the slave trade was banned, slavery as such was never banned. However, when the slave markets were closed and open slavery visually disappeared from the public eye, slavery was considered to be de facto abolished.[24]I did not know that slavery was legal in somebody places in the last hundred years.
When looking this up this is what I found
- In the United States, slavery was officially abolished with the passage of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865, but discrimination and racial inequality persisted in the form of Jim Crow laws and practices.
- In South Africa, the system of racial segregation and oppression known as apartheid was in place from 1948 to 1994.
- In India, the caste system, which has been described as a form of "hidden slavery," persisted into the 20th century and continues to affect millions of people today.
- In the early 20th century, forced labor was used in many colonies of European powers, and in some cases, it was used in concentration camps.
- In the Soviet Union, forced labor was used extensively during the Stalin era for industrialization and construction of infrastructure, especially during the period of the Great Purge from 1936 to 1938, where millions of people were arrested, sent to labor camps and executed.
No mention of the African slavery Still legal in 1960
Where is the discrimination?Florida governor Ron DeSantis put the brakes on discriminatory job fair the NHL was planning in Fort Lauderdale where anyone except heterosexual white men were welcome.
Hockey league scuttles criteria after administration criticism.
The Ron DeSantis administration is able to declare victory over a major sports league, which changed plans for a diversity job fair in South Florida.
Fox News Digital first reported that the National Hockey League has abandoned plans to hold a job fair that would have opened up opportunities to various groups historically marginalized in the United States.
The so-called “Pathway to Hockey Summit,” to be held Feb. 2 in Fort Lauderdale during the NHL’s All-Star Weekend, was originally tailored to “diverse job seekers who are pursuing careers in hockey,” according to a now-deleted LinkedIn post that raised the ire of the DeSantis administration.
“Participants must be 18 years of age or older, based in the U.S., and identify as female, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic/Latino, Indigenous, LGBTQIA+, and/or a person with a disability. Veterans are also welcome and encouraged to attend,” asserted the previous event description, which drew the ire of a DeSantis spokesperson.
“Discrimination of any sort is not welcome in the state of Florida, and we do not abide by the woke notion that discrimination should be overlooked if applied in a politically popular manner or against a politically unpopular demographic. We are fighting all discrimination in our schools and our workplaces, and we will fight it in publicly accessible places of meeting or activity,” Bryan Griffin told Fox News Friday.
The revised posting eliminates any reference to ethnic, gender, sexual orientation, and military veteran status.
“The Pathway to Hockey Summit is a career event, especially to encourage those that historically have not been exposed to hockey and all who are interested in learning more about career opportunities in the sport.”
The NHL distanced itself from the previous language as “not accurate,” suggesting that the intent was really to reach out to people unfamiliar with hockey.
“The Pathway to Hockey Summit is an informational and networking event designed to encourage all individuals to consider a career in our game – and, in particular, alert those who might not be familiar with hockey to the opportunities it offers,” the NHL spokesperson said.
The NHL seems to have extended its deadline for registration in light of the revised criteria.
Florida’s Voice reported that the original deadline for registration was Friday the 13th, with accepted applicants to be told on Tuesday Jan. 17. The updated posting says that they will now be told a week later, on Jan. 24.
Though the wording has been changed, reminders of the previous job search remain on career boards, such as ones from the University of Southern Californiaand the University of Pennsylvania. These postings still maintain that participants “must … identify as female, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic/Latino, Indigenous, LGBTQIA+, and/or a person with a disability,” or be military veterans.