What a massive flip-flop

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,632
3,828
113
Look, I know immigration is a hot button topic. There are a lot of cons to the way this happened. But, on a purely economic level, we need more people. We have an aging population and a birthrate below replacement levels. This means we need new Canadians to help maintain our economy...and it is something the US and other countries might need to do soon as well. I look at Japan and wonder what is going to happen there, where they have a declining population...where the could have half their population by 2100. They do not have immigration for the most part, so what will happen to their economy?
Bringing in more immigrants while offshoring good jobs is not the solution.
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,882
3,462
113
Bringing in more immigrants to work at Timmie's while offshoring jobs won't fix the problem you keep repeating.
Hiring more government employees won't fix it either.

The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

...but it sounds like you're beginning to understand that now.
Sure skippy, sure.

Zero sum man.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,462
2,045
113
Ghawar
Look, I know immigration is a hot button topic. There are a lot of cons to the way this happened. But, on a purely economic level, we need more people. We have an aging population and a birthrate below replacement levels. This means we need new Canadians to help maintain our economy...and it is something the US and other countries might need to do soon as well. I look at Japan and wonder what is going to happen there, where they have a declining population...where the could have half their population by 2100. They do not have immigration for the most part, so what will happen to their economy?
So is Trudeau wrong now that the liberals are going to reduce admission of
immigrants, international students and temporary foreign workers?
 

DesRicardo

aka Dick Dastardly
Dec 2, 2022
2,152
2,138
113
In 1966 there were 7.7 working-age individuals for every senior. This ratio has dropped quickly since then and stands at 3.4 in 2022. Statistics Canada projects this trend will continue in the decades ahead. There will be just 3.0 working-age people for each senior by 2027, after which the ratio will slowly fall further to reach 2.3 by 2068.
What happened to the projected 500K? Was it correct or wrong?
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,882
3,462
113
Bringing in more immigrants while offshoring good jobs is not the solution.
Wow, sure sounds like you have your meat hooks deep, deep into the complex and varied ingredients that comprises a sound and savory stew of immigration policies, plans and procedures.

Where did you study, the Sorbonne, Oxford, the Doug Ford School of Immigration atop a massage parlor in a inner suburban, strip plaza?
 

DesRicardo

aka Dick Dastardly
Dec 2, 2022
2,152
2,138
113
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,882
3,462
113
What happened to the projected 500K? Was it correct or wrong?
"R u fer it, or agin it?" - notorious and relentless cross examination quote by Des
 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,282
5,371
113
So is Trudeau wrong now that the liberals are going to reduce admission of
immigrants, international students and temporary foreign workers?
I think the policy was sound. Execution....maybe not so much. There are pros and cons, obviously. Having more people makes our GDP larger, but also raises prices and deflate wages. But, on a demographic level, there are MANY reasons to bring in more people. But, we cannot abandon the point system that has worked so well in the past. Bring the skilled immigrants who can help Canada grow.

What worries me here is that a lot of the anti-immigration rhetoric is dangerously close to xenophobic language. Are they anti-immigrant because we're getting a lot of brown people coming here? I don't know. But, I've seen an explosion of intolerance on social media platforms for south Asians or Arabic folks in Canada.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,462
2,045
113
Ghawar
...............................
This means we need new Canadians to help maintain our economy...and it is something the US and other countries might need to do soon as well. I look at Japan and wonder what is going to happen there, where they have a declining population...
You could say the same thing regarding China, South Korea, France, Germany,
Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the UK. Their populations are either nearly as
old or considerably older than that of Canada. Some but not all of these countries
have turned to mass immigration to grow their population.

Aging of population needs to be addressed but mass immigration is not
the only solution.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,462
2,045
113
Ghawar
........................................
But, on a demographic level, there are MANY reasons to bring in more people.
........................
So is it right or wrong to bring in less people in the upcoming years?


 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,282
5,371
113
You could say the same thing regarding China, South Korea, France, Germany,
Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the UK. Their populations are either nearly as
old or considerably older than that of Canada. Some but not all of these countries
have turned to mass immigration to grow their population.

Aging of population needs to be addressed but mass immigration is not
the only solution.
Some economists applauded Canada for opening up immigration because they were getting a jump on the competition. We'll see what the other countries will do....but China kind of shot themselves in the foot, with the one-child policy....so, there are more dudes than women, which is going to be a problem....

Now, for other solutions....what do you think that would be? Could it be what the GOP is sort of trying to sell, with forced births and no abortion? Or, do you take a more supportive structure and help families. You can do this in a few ways: allow mothers and fathers longer parental leave, improve the daycare system so it isn't stupidly expensive, provide support to families with tax breaks/credits and the child allowance. Help ensure that women on leave can return to their jobs and advance their careers (and it wouldn't hurt to help with pensions/retirement savings which disappear for the time on maternity leave).

Canada already has several of these ideals (as do many of the European countries), so what would you suggest?
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,632
3,828
113
I think the policy was sound. Execution....maybe not so much. There are pros and cons, obviously. Having more people makes our GDP larger, but also raises prices and deflate wages. But, on a demographic level, there are MANY reasons to bring in more people. But, we cannot abandon the point system that has worked so well in the past. Bring the skilled immigrants who can help Canada grow.

What worries me here is that a lot of the anti-immigration rhetoric is dangerously close to xenophobic language. Are they anti-immigrant because we're getting a lot of brown people coming here? I don't know. But, I've seen an explosion of intolerance on social media platforms for south Asians or Arabic folks in Canada.
Wow that's a delicate way of saying when conservatives call for controlling immigration they are xenophobes but when Liberals want to control it then it's worth a civil conversation and don't dare call them xenophobes.

Do you even see the hypocrisy in that?
 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,282
5,371
113
So is it right or wrong to bring in less people in the upcoming years?


Who can really say. I mean, if its a temporary thing, just to re-calibrate things, then that shouldn't be an issue. Long-term? Who knows. Maybe we'll have a major baby boom and it will right the ship. And, of course, the economists could be wrong about the demographic issues. I don't think they are, but we'll see. Might take a few decades...
 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,282
5,371
113
Wow that's a delicate way of saying when conservatives call for controlling immigration they are xenophobes but when Liberals want to control it then it's worth a civil conversation and don't dare call them xenophobes.

Do you even see the hypocrisy in that?
First, to be clear, I didn't say conservatives were saying xenophobic things. But it is interesting that you went there...

What I am saying is that I've seen a lot of folks spewing hate to immigrants on social media. They say they don't have Canadian values or they smell, can't drive or are not assimilating into the country. Which....is something we've heard about nearly all immigrant waves in the past, from the Irish and the Italians to the Chinese. But it still worries me. I love the idea of Canada being a welcoming place for those looking for a better life. People that will work hard and help improve our way of life.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,632
3,828
113
First, to be clear, I didn't say conservatives were saying xenophobic things. But it is interesting that you went there...

What I am saying is that I've seen a lot of folks spewing hate to immigrants on social media. They say they don't have Canadian values or they smell, can't drive or are not assimilating into the country. Which....is something we've heard about nearly all immigrant waves in the past, from the Irish and the Italians to the Chinese. But it still worries me. I love the idea of Canada being a welcoming place for those looking for a better life. People that will work hard and help improve our way of life.
I didn't say conservatives were saying xenophobic things...I said they are called xenophobes if they dare speak of controlling immigration.

Spewing hate to immigrants has unfortunately been happening forever and everywhere. The point is that in modern times, the left has been peddling a narrative that it's the right that is spewing this hate.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,462
2,045
113
Ghawar
...................................
Now, for other solutions....what do you think that would be?
......................................
I don't think any reasonable people would reject immigration as
a solution. It is the excessive volume of immigration that is the
problem. In the case of Germany mass immigration as the solution
has not been promising to say the least.

There is probably not one single solution that would safeguard
the well being of our future. I think the more pragmatic solutions
would entail among other things: i) immigration policy aimed for
admission of well qualified immigrants at
moderate levels. ii) Reduction of government deficit and hopefully
the debt burder eventually. iii) Public housing construction.
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,882
3,462
113
I didn't say conservatives were saying xenophobic things...I said they are called xenophobes if they dare speak of controlling immigration.

Spewing hate to immigrants has unfortunately been happening forever and everywhere. The point is that in modern times, the left has been peddling a narrative that it's the right that is spewing this hate.
"So r u fer it, or agin it?" - monumental Skoobian cross examination quote
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,462
2,045
113
Ghawar
...........
What I am saying is that I've seen a lot of folks spewing hate to immigrants on social media. They say they don't have Canadian values or they smell, can't drive or are not assimilating into the country. Which....is something we've heard about nearly all immigrant waves in the past, from the Irish and the Italians to the Chinese. But it still worries me. I love the idea of Canada being a welcoming place for those looking for a better life. People that will work hard and help improve our way of life.
As far as I can see hate spewed by uncanadian-behaving folks
to immigrants is not the reason Trudeau flip-flopped. Trudeau
and his Liberals simply realized they fxxked up.

Discrimination against immigrants is worrisome but not
an issue in revising our immigration policy.
 
Toronto Escorts