Voyeur?

Since I live in a quiet neighbourhood full of houses... I actually have to use it for its intended use! LOL BUT... I think it would be more fun to spy on T-boy's neighbours though! :D
 
Last edited:
Cycleguy007 said:
I think it would be more fun to spy on tboy's neighbours though!

I don't know. I see some of you cyclists riding around my neigbourhood wearing those weird googles looking at women. Are those the rumoured googles that can "see" through women's clothes?
 
Rockslinger said:
I don't know. I see some of you cyclists riding around my neigbourhood wearing those weird googles looking at women. Are those the rumoured googles that can "see" through women's clothes?
You should goggle googles...wait...strike that and reverse it.
 
Rockslinger said:
I don't know. I see some of you cyclists riding around my neigbourhood wearing those weird googles looking at women. Are those the rumoured googles that can "see" through women's clothes?

You haven't been following very closely rockslinger... I only wear LIVESTRONG Oakleys! LOL

http://oakley.ca/pd/5598/18696

(BUT I had them fitted with special lenses! The kind that see through women's clothes!) :D
 
Cycleguy007 said:
... I only wear LIVESTRONG Oakleys!

The Rockslinger SC gang is planning to kidnap one of these cyclists (hopefully alive) and check out those weird goggles and funny tight shorts that stop just above the knees and also the helmet. We know these cyclists with their funny gear and clothing cruising our neighbourhood are up to no good. In the meantime, we are taking no chances and locking up our wives and daughters.
 
Rockslinger said:
The Rockslinger SC gang is planning to kidnap one of these cyclists (hopefully alive) and check out those weird goggles and funny tight shorts that stop just above the knees and also the helmet. We know these cyclists with their funny gear and clothing cruising our neighbourhood are up to no good. In the meantime, we are taking no chances and locking up our wives and daughters.

718_running_over.gif
 
T-boy said:
So, is this ethically ok?! Should I feel ashamed that I'm watching?! I mostly think its ok....these people are in their apartments, lights on, curtains open. Surely if they cared they would close their curtains?! Plus, its better than TV!

Does anybody else do anything like this?! Or should I just get out more?! :p

!

its wrong. you know its wrong. if you think they want you to watch - go over and ask them if they mind. I dare ya.
 
Rylan said:
I don't think it is like being at a nude beach at all. I think that is comparing apples to oranges.

I think you have no self control and are trying to justify something that you know is wrong. Even if you can see in, doesn't mean you have to nor do you have stare for long periods of time. I can see my neighbors across the street from my livingroom of my house but I don't watch. I can see alot from my apartment as I am in the tallest building and have a better vantage point the other buildings in the area, but I don't watch.

Seeing and watching are two different things. You will do what you want, but I am personally glad that I don't live across from you.

I also think that if your neighbors were told what you are doing, they probably would get curtains and a big sign that says &*^% OFF!

I am not judging you BTW, that is just my opinion.

I respectfully disagree with your opinion:) . If the neighbours don't want to be watched they should close their farkin curtains----lol. Case closed!
 
squash500 said:
I respectfully disagree with your opinion:) . If the neighbours don't want to be watched they should close their farkin curtains----lol. Case closed!
Can't argue with that ... if people are having sex in a densely populated urban setting with their windows uncovered, clearly they arent overly concerned about their privacy. Who knows, maybe they even get off on being watched. If not, how hard is it to hang a bed sheet on a couple of nails?

As for watching ... whatever turns you on!
 
Cycleguy007 said:
So is your female neighbour as hot as Meg Ryan was in that film? :D

I wouldn't watch if she wasn't hot! So yes, she's hot. The girl in the "couple" is uber hot in fact...! The single girl below is also fairly hot, but possibly a little older, its hard to tell! Maybe I should get that telescope!

I agree with Rylan that private property should be private etc - but if somebody see's me naked in my apartment...then game on, I'm an idiot for not closing the curtains! Ok, I would probably be mad/embarrassed if I found out that somebody could see me...but I would still think its my fault for my oversight.

Now, if I have crazy hot sex with the curtains open AND the lights on (like the couple I often see) then really, if you are watching...go ahead...I'm either really stupid to forget the curtains, or I like people to watch and it turns me on!
 
T-boy said:
but if somebody see's me naked in my apartment...then game on, I'm an idiot for not closing the curtains!

Wasn't there a case where a naked man was arrested for standing naked inside his house behind an uncurtained window?
 
Rockslinger said:
Wasn't there a case where a naked man was arrested for standing naked inside his house behind an uncurtained window?
I was just about to say that. He was charged with indecent exposure due to several neighbours complaints.
 
Rono said:
He was charged with indecent exposure due to several neighbours complaints.

What was the aftermath? Did the charge stick? Is a naked man not the king of his own home?
 
Reminds me of "Rear Window" (1954) lol. Those old 50's Exakta cameras with the telephoto lenses were a hoot. Just hope they don't see you one day and pay you a visit haha...of course if she is as hot as you say, maybe her paying you a visit would be a good thing...;)
 
Rockslinger said:
What was the aftermath? Did the charge stick? Is a naked man not the king of his own home?

Did the neighbors get charged for looking? Heh.
 
Rockslinger said:
What was the aftermath? Did the charge stick? Is a naked man not the king of his own home?
Don't know. I wonder though.
 
You're not supposed to watch and they're not supposed to exhibit themselves. Either side of the performance can be entirely innocent—the first, unexpected time—but if it's a customary act then it's exhibitionism at one curtainless window and voyeurism at the other. Nobody gets to claim victim status from such a matchup.
 
squash500 said:
I respectfully disagree with your opinion . If the neighbours don't want to be watched they should close their farkin curtains----lol. Case closed!


Some people don't think in high buildings they can be seen. I know many who would close curtains on a main level or a house, but once you get up in the higher apartments, people just don't think about it.

I don't think it is fair game, I think we as people should have more self control. Like finding a wallet and not cleaning the money out before giving it back. There are just some things that are wrong regardless of how you justify it.

I realize that I am in the minority here, but that is because I am on a board full of pervs....:D
 
Rylan said:
Some people don't think in high buildings they can be seen. I know many who would close curtains on a main level or a house, but once you get up in the higher apartments, people just don't think about it.

Nice try ... Only problem with that reasoning is that the OP specifically stated that the couple live in a condo across the street. The only way he could get a good view of their activity is if they are at approximately the same level, which I'm assuming is the case. You would have to be unbelievably naive to think that you can't be seen in a well-lit high-rise building, from another high-rise 100 metres away.

I could understand if the couple were seniors, then you could argue that they were just absent-minded ... in which case, T-boy wouldn't likely be interested ;)

In any case, given how willing some people are to expose themselves on the internet these days, and how many people are willing to watch, this seems neither very shocking or perverted to me.

.