VOTE For PC
- Thread starter Gibby
- Start date
They can if they want to.
http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=res&dir=loi/fel/cea&document=part17&lang=e
Same rules for corporations, individuals and unions as registered third party advertisers.
Looks like its your post that was fast,,,.....,,...but useless.
So what?
Not even Reagan or Thatcher got all their political enemies in one shot.
The game goes on.
Special
You are the perfect example of useless,...considering you don't possess the inability to read and comprehend,...I did NOT ask if they could,...but did they,...but I guess you put your Deflector Man costume on again,...and ran around your mother basement yelling,... I am Deflector Man,...
A small point you are missing in your support for anything union,...the cops ads have them using uniforms and police vehicles,...when the same club of civil servants charged some 65 year old crossing guard for using a safety jacket in a video.
Talk about small minded,…but obviously privileged.
FAST
You are the perfect example of useless,...considering you don't possess the inability to read and comprehend,...I did NOT ask if they could,...but did they,...but I guess you put your Deflector Man costume on again,...and ran around your mother basement yelling,... I am Deflector Man,...
A small point you are missing in your support for anything union,...the cops ads have them using uniforms and police vehicles,...when the same club of civil servants charged some 65 year old crossing guard for using a safety jacket in a video.
Talk about small minded,…but obviously privileged.
FAST
So you think there should be different rules for corporations and unions, do you?
(and by the way, I'm against the police doing political advertising, we don't need a political police force)
They were made an essential service. That means that they cannot be locked out, and they cannot strike. Any dispute is sent to arbitration, and arbitrators will generally decide in favor of continuity: they will select the contact most like the existing contract if the two sides disagree.
In short, the city had NO bargaining power to roll back that deal. No possibility of a lock out, and no real way to fix it through arbitration.
Not a hint of unions anywhere on the Toronto Tax Payers Coalition site and mostly conservative (and Conservative) backgrounds.
Just how are these citizens lying about who they are? How are they or their organization "anti-democracy"?
Actually the "Toronto Tax Payers Coalition" is a far right wing "coalition" claiming to always be speaking on behalf of the tax payers (when they're really just speaking out of their own self serving asses).
Like a 'customer service rep' at the bank calling the price they charge when you take your own money out a 'convenience charge'?
Simple solution. Don't keep your own money in the bank.
P.S. Ever notice those lockers in bus stations that charge you a fee to get back your own stuff? Why shouldn't banks do the same with money?
The lockers are for space rented for a single use in a limited time. Like buying a bond.
If you actually read your depositor deal with the bank, it's nothing like that. You hand them cash which they invest and keep all profits from. If it wasn't for government, you'd be SOL if the investments went south and they lost it all. They charge what they choose for whatever service they like—like telling you how much they have at the moment, or if they felt like sharing a bit of what they made with your cash and paid some interest—but you have no fixed or enforceable contract for any of that.
All their customer service stuff is euphemisms—the polite word—worthy of the worst pol bribing you with your own tax-money.
Like shopping for a 'better' bank, it's high time we woke up and stopped judging excellence by how cheap the promises are. Time to look at the real value we get for the money we cannot avoid paying.
Last edited:
No lies here
Looks like I was PARTIALLY wrong, no union involvement, should have researched first,...see how its done,...losers.
But I have yet to see any ads from them, so really doesn't count, does it.
And speaking out for the majority of employees,...none union in other words, how greedy is that.
FAST
Looks like I was PARTIALLY wrong, no union involvement, should have researched first,...see how its done,...losers.
But I have yet to see any ads from them, so really doesn't count, does it.
And speaking out for the majority of employees,...none union in other words, how greedy is that.
FAST
I'd rather cut my own balls off and sew them to my forehead then vote PC. On the brightside I'm even less willing to vote liberal.
You happily called what you hadn't bothered to research—in fact haven't even seen—a bunch of lies, and you say your utter ignorance means it doesn't count? What planet are you from?
Since you asked: In adult discussion, what you say does count. Without a report on the state of your knowledge attached to each post, we assume you know what you're said, and take responsibility for it. Otherwise, the only possible way 'not to count' what you say, is never to count it.
Your grudging, "Looks like I was PARTIALLY wrong" is just more childishness. Nothing in your original post was right or truthful. In your terms, it was all lies.
He said it would be through retirement & attrition
Besides if these people are worth what we are paying them, they should have no trouble securing a similar or better compensation package in the private sector
I guess it is going to be pretty easy identifying the ones who voted NDP then.
LOL
