Where Prasad says that vaxx mandates are like Hitler's Germany??...Once again.......Did you watch the video?
Sure, I did. What better way of spending 30 minutes of my life?!...
Where Prasad says that vaxx mandates are like Hitler's Germany??...Once again.......Did you watch the video?
For those who might want to read the actual study Prasad is referencing here.
Dr. Prasad calls you waiting for it.....Deranged,lol.
Boosters don't work on people who were previously infected.
Case fatality rate of the people who tested positive for cov19 and died was .08% that's right folks...8 one hundredths of one percent. Not the 3.4 % B.S. that the WHO was trying to pedal in 2020.
I did. Hence my response. No one is forcing you to take the booster. The pushback has not been against the booster, but the vaccine itself. I got 3 shots totally, and am not going to get further annual boosters. The flu vaccine is the same. You have annual boosters available, but I never get it.Once again.......Did you watch the video?
Because Wikipedia is without bias and non partisan, lolI did. Hence my response. No one is forcing you to take the booster. The pushback has not been against the booster, but the vaccine itself. I got 3 shots totally, and am not going to get further annual boosters. The flu vaccine is the same. You have annual boosters available, but I never get it.
I also read about this guy and apparently:
In October 2021, Prasad prompted social media controversy when he published a blog post comparing the U.S. COVID-19 pandemic response to the beginnings of Adolf Hitler's Third Reich.
Now once someone is nutty enough to say that, you'd have to question their motivations whenever they talk about vaccines and boosters.
Also SMH at all these MAGA Indians.
It is a direct quote wikipedia is referring to. He compared the COVID 19 response to Hitler's third reich. That is nutty.Because Wikipedia is without bias and non partisan, lol
Oh and about your face masks...Here's a quote from something I was reading yesterday.
''Anyone with an understanding of aerosol physics knew immediately that face masks, even N-95 masks, would be worthless to stop 0.1 um virus particles. It is also obvious that particles the size of a virus can remain airborne a very long time and travel very long distances. There are no forces to act on them to remove them from the air. They tend not to collide with surfaces. They are too small to be affected by gravity. If they do not become charged, there are no electrostatic forces to remove them.''
''An analogy of a mosquito and a chain link fence is pretty good. It skips all the brownian motion, nucleation, accumulation, reactions and other complexity. But it is essentially correct. There is no way to keep mosquitoes from penetrating a chain link fence. Neither can virus particles be stopped by a cloth mask. Face masks for coronavirus "protection" have always been an exercise in theater. You do not need "clinical trials" or any other "human experiments" to know the answers from first principles.''
That 0.08% fatality rate is in the study cited - in other words, only people recorded in the national health data from the Austrian epidemiological reporting system during November and December 2022.The fatality rate is 1.1% in Canada across the whole population. So not sure where you got the 3.4% from. Also, if you look at the deaths, the primary group affected are the 60 to 90 year olds. (Incidentally the age group of many on here. )
Considering they and Pfizer both stated that their vaccines(not) had an efficiency of over 90% when they didn't and would provide immunity for up to a year yet encouraged boosters after 6 months I'd say yes. They LIED!So what? Are you saying that because it is funded by Moderna, everything in there is a blatant LIE? Like they actually killed all the people who participated in the trial, but covered up the murders and said exactly the opposite in the paper to trick you into getting the vaccine?
Yes but there are variants. This is why even the flu vaccine is updated each year. None of this is unusual. So get the initial vaccine, and you can choose if you get subsequent boosters. That is not unreasonable.Considering they and Pfizer both stated that their vaccines(not) had an efficiency of over 90% when they didn't and would provide immunity for up to a year yet encouraged boosters after 6 months I'd say yes. They LIED!
So get the initial vaccine, and you can choose if you get subsequent boosters. That is not unreasonable.
It had nothing to do with variants. The vaccines never worked on the original variant and yet they encouraged people to still get a booster for a variant that was no longer circulating. There was no need to get a booster 6 months later if the vaccines worked. You can't have it both ways.Yes but there are variants. This is why even the flu vaccine is updated each year. None of this is unusual. So get the initial vaccine, and you can choose if you get subsequent boosters. That is not unreasonable.
How do you know it did not work? Because I personally know cases it actually worked and saved lives.It had nothing to do with variants. The vaccines never worked on the original variant and yet they encouraged people to still get a booster for a variant that was no longer circulating. There was no need to get a booster 6 months later if the vaccines worked. You can't have it both ways.
that my friend is BSBecause I personally know cases it actually worked and saved lives.
No. I am talking about elderly people in my family and in several of my friends families who had pre-existing conditions. They should have dropped dead, if not for the vaccine.that my friend is BS
like I said BSNo. I am talking about elderly people in my family and in several of my friends families who had pre-existing conditions. They should have dropped dead, if not for the vaccine.
Why do you think random people on youtube are more reliable that large scale studies?Once again.......Did you watch the video?
Which obviously isn't him....
''Anyone with an understanding of aerosol physics ...
I know elderly people with conditions who got covid prior to the vaccines and they were fine.No. I am talking about elderly people in my family and in several of my friends families who had pre-existing conditions. They should have dropped dead, if not for the vaccine.
How do you really know it did. I know people who got covid before and after taking the vaccines and for some reason believed it saved their life. How can you really tell when most people who got covid had mild symptoms. A report stated that the vaccines saved 20 million lives world wide out of 6 billion people who took them and more than 90% didn't need them.How do you know it did not work? Because I personally know cases it actually worked and saved lives.
I know some people that after getting the vaccine developed serious side effectsI know elderly people with conditions who got covid prior to the vaccines and they were fine.