update - appeal court strikes down TX 2025 gerrymandered electoral map

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113
Red flags fly as Trump's revenge cases funneled to Aileen Cannon


The Department of Justice is setting up President Donald Trump-appointed U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to hear Trump revenge cases, according to a former U.S. attorney.

The Southern District of Florida U.S. Attorney’s office is reportedly ramping up the revenge prosecutions in a "mass investigation" and targeting Trump enemies, even eyeing cases against former President Barack Obama and former CIA Director John Brennan, MSNBC reported Tuesday.


The move has prompted several resignations, including two prosecutors, who stepped down from their jobs following an impromptu meeting Monday where they were ordered “to take part in a vast ‘conspiracy’ investigation into former intelligence and law enforcement officials.”

"At least one of them was asked to do something that was outside of their realm of comfortability and they believed would violate their ethical responsibilities," MSNBC senior White House reporter Vaughn Hillyard reported.



More than 30 subpoenas were issued on Friday by the DOJ, which reportedly “bypassed what multiple legal experts told MSNBC is standard protocol for its issuance of subpoenas, turning to a member of leadership to sign off on some of them, instead of a line prosecutor assigned to investigate the case.”



more

But there is another uncommon move.

"Typically, you would expect the line prosecutors who are handling the case to be the people who would sign subpoenas," legal analyst and former U.S. attorney Barbara McQuade told MSNBC.

"It sounds, though, like this is some sort of special project that they're putting together, some sort of special unit. Executive U.S. attorneys sometimes have in their portfolio special projects. So it sounds to me like this executive U.S. attorney is going to be leading whatever this effort is into this conspiracy investigation. But I do think it's noteworthy that this is not being handled the way a routine case would be handled for a violation of the law. Instead, it is being handled as a special case with a high-level executive member of the team handling this," she added.

The location of the case is also raising questions and concerns.



more

"The other thing that I thought was noteworthy about the reporting is that the grand jury to be impaneled is going to be in Fort Pierce, Florida. That, of course, is the district that the portion of the district, the southern district of Florida, that has one and only one judge, and that judge is Aileen Cannon. I don't know that we should be suspicious of everything Judge Aileen Cannondoes, but we do know that her track record in the Mar-a-Lago case with the documents was first to impose some really extraordinary hoops for the prosecutors to go through at the time of the search," McQuade said.

"And then, of course, the dismissal of the case, finding the special counsel regulations to be unconstitutional, contrary to every other court that's looked at it. So I think there is reason to be very concerned about the irregularities that are occurring in this office," she said.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113
Trump pardons the husband of Republican supporter Rep. Diana Harshbarger of Tennessee


WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has pardoned Tennessee Republican Rep. Diana Harshbarger's husband, who pleaded guilty more than a decade ago to health care fraud and other crimes and served time in federal prison.
Robert Harshbarger Jr. was a licensed pharmacist in 2013 when he admitted substituting a cheaper drug imported from China that was not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the iron sucrose that the FDA had approved for kidney dialysis patients to use. He was sentenced to and served four years in prison.


more

Trump signed the pardon document on Friday, according to the website of the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the Department of Justice. It was among several pardons the Republican president issued, including to a former speaker of the Tennessee House and to former Major League Baseball slugger and New York Mets great Darryl Strawberry.
Trump last week also pardoned a former New York police sergeant who was convicted of helping China try to scare an ex-official into going back to his homeland. On Monday, Trump pardoned his former personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, his onetime chief of staff Mark Meadows and many others accused of backing his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden.
A White House official on Tuesday defended the pardon for Harshbarger, saying that he was a victim of “excessive prosecution” and that the drug substitution he made was a common practice among pharmacists known as “compounding,” in which unapproved drugs are provided to patients based on their condition or for other reasons. The official insisted on anonymity to discuss the reasoning behind Trump's clemency decision.
Expand article logo


Presidents have broad constitutional powers to grant pardons, which do not erase criminal convictions but can be seen as acts of justice or mercy, often in cases that can further public welfare.

Harshbarger turned to the Chinese drug due to a backlog of the iron sucrose drug, the White House official said. No patients were alleged to have been harmed by the substitution, and doctors seemed to prefer the drug Harshbarger gave them because it was easier to administer, the official said.



more

Prosecutors said that even though there were no reports of patients being harmed, Harshbarger's substitution still put patients at risk since the FDA cannot assure the safety and effectiveness of products from other countries.

Harshbarger has served his sentence, the official said. He also was ordered to pay restitution, pay a fine and forfeit $425,000 in cash.

Rep. Harshbarger, who is also a licensed pharmacist, was first elected to the U.S. House in 2020 and has been a strong supporter of Trump. She spoke in support of Trump outside his hush money criminal trial in New York in 2024 and in other settings.

Trump has backed all of her congressional campaigns and offered her his “Complete and Total Endorsement” for reelection in 2026 in a Nov. 3 social media post.

She was not a member of Congress when her husband pleaded guilty in 2013 to one count of distributing a misbranded drug and one count of health care fraud.
more

Robert Harshbarger's license was revoked in 2013 after the conviction, according to the website of the Tennessee Department of Health. The congresswoman remains licensed, the records show.

The congresswoman's office in Washington did not immediately respond to a telephone message seeking comment.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113
Trump bombing spree leads to 'a significant rupture' in US relations with the UK


President Donald Trump's policy of bombing purported drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, which multiple legal experts have decried as an illegal act extrajudicial murder, is now meeting resistance from a top US ally.

CNN reported on Tuesday that the UK has now stopped sharing intelligence related to suspected drug-trafficking vessels with the US because the country does not want to be complicit in strikes that it believes violate international law.



more

CNN's sources say that the UK stopped giving the US information about boats in the region roughly a month ago, shortly after Trump began authorizing drone strikes against them in a campaign that so far has killed at least 76 people.

"Before the US military began blowing up boats in September, countering illicit drug trafficking was handled by law enforcement and the US Coast Guard, [and] cartel members and drug smugglers were treated as criminals with due process rights," explained CNN.

Last month, after his administration had already launched several strikes, Trump declared drug cartels enemy combatants and claimed he has the right to launch military strikes against suspected drug-trafficking boats.

Appearing on CNN on Tuesday to discuss the story, reporter Natasha Bertrand described the decision to stop sharing intelligence as "a really significant rupture" between the US and its closest ally.




more

"We're told that the UK is deeply uncomfortable with [the boat strikes], and they believe that it is pretty blatantly illegal," Bertrand explained. "It really underscores the continued questions surrounding the legality of this US military campaign."

The US military began its boat attacks in the Caribbean in September, and has since expanded them to purported drug boats operating in the Pacific Ocean.

Reporting last month from the Wall Street Journal indicated that the administration was also preparing to attack a variety of targets inside Venezuela, whose government Trump has baselessly accused of running drug cartels. Potential targets include “ports and airports controlled by the military that are allegedly used to traffic drugs, including naval facilities and airstrips.”

TheWashington Post reported on Tuesday that the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier has now arrived off the coast of Latin America, in a move that the paper notes "has fueled speculation the Trump administration intends to dramatically escalate its deadly counternarcotics campaign there, possibly through direct attacks on Venezuela."


more

Reports from the US government and the United Nations have not identified Venezuela as a significant source of drugs that enter the United States, and the country plays virtually no role in the trafficking of fentanyl, the primary cause of drug overdoses in the US.

The administration's military aggression in Latin America has also sparked a fierce backlash in the region, where dozens of political leaders last month condemned the boat attacks, while also warning that they could just be the start of a regime change war reminiscent of Cold War-era US-backed coups like ones that occurred in Chile, Brazil, and other nations.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113


Nearly a month before President Donald Trump met Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Helsinki in 2018, Jeffrey Epstein attempted to pass a message to Russia’s top diplomat: If you want to understand Trump, talk to me.

“I think you might suggest to putin that lavrov can get insight on talking to me,” Epstein wrote in a June 24, 2018, email to Thorbjorn Jagland, a former prime minister of Norway who was leading the Council of Europe at the time of the exchange. Lavrov was an apparent reference to Sergei Lavrov, Russia’s longtime foreign minister.


In the email exchange, one of hundreds released Wednesday by congressional investigators, Epstein indicated he had previously talked about Trump with Vitaly Churkin, Russia’s forceful ambassador to the United Nations, before Churkin died in 2017.

“Churkin was great,” Epstein, the late convicted sex offender, wrote. “He understood trump after our conversations. it is not complex. he must be seen to get something its that simple.”

The exchange was among dozens that showcase Epstein’s extraordinary network of international associates, whom he often corresponded with about Trump’s first-term policy decisions.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the emails, but press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a briefing Wednesday the broader set of emails “prove absolutely nothing other than President Trump did nothing wrong.”

Trump later posted on Truth Social: “Democrats are trying to bring up the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax again because they’ll do anything at all to deflect on how badly they’ve done on the Shutdown.” He was referring to the U.S. government shutdown.

In the emails, Jagland said he was meeting Lavrov’s assistant the following day and would suggest a connection with Epstein. It’s unclear if anything ever came of the proposed contact.
But Epstein would later opine about Trump’s fateful meeting with Putin, which was panned around the world for his apparent capitulations to the Russian dictator.


“Do the Russians have stuff on Trump? Today was appalling even by his standards,” wrote Larry Summers, the former Clinton administration Treasury secretary and Obama administration economic adviser, in an email to Epstein on July 16, 2018, the day of the Helsinki summit with Putin.

“My email is full with similar comments. wow,” Epstein replied the next day. “Im sure his view is that it went super well. he thinks he has charmed his adversary.. Admittedly he has no idea of the symbolism. He has no idea of most things.” He also called Trump’s handling of the summit with Putin “predictable.”

Summers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Days later, Epstein was flexing his overseas relationships in an email exchange with former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, telling him in a July 23, 2018, message that Bannon needed to be physically present in Europe to wield influence on the continent.

“If you are going to play here , you’ll have to spend time, europe by remote doesn’t work,” Epstein wrote.

Epstein told Bannon he could organize one-on-one meetings with foreign leaders but that he would have to stay for several days.

“The fear is that you gin up their hopes and emotions and then abandon them. I think you want to be an insider, not an outsider flying in and out.”

A representative for Bannon declined to comment.

Epstein often relied on his foreign contacts to learn about their views of Trump as he obsessively tracked the new president’s actions. And at other times, he simply showcased his deep connections around the world in emails with other associates.

“Can you belive MBS sent me a TENT carpets and all,” Epstein wrote to billionaire businessman Tom Pritzker in December 2016, referring to Mohammed bin Salman, who is now the Saudi crown prince.


“A tent? Hmmm…” Pritzker wrote back. “I think that is code for ‘I love you’. Or, maybe code for ‘go pound sand’. Better check your [Kingdom of Saudi Arabia] urban dictionary.”
Pritzker did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

A year before he reached out to Jagland for help with the Russians, Jagland asked Epstein to visit him in Strasbourg, France, so Epstein could help him “understand more about Trump and what’s going on in the American society.”

Among Epstein’s international connections was Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, a businessman based in the United Arab Emirates. Sulayem asked Epstein two weeks before Trump’s first inauguration if he should “accept the invitation” extended to him by Trump associate Tom Barrack, who oversaw the event.

Barrack did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Epstein responded that it would be “very crowded” but might be worth it to make connections in Washington or New York before and after the festivities.

“Do you think it will be possible to shake hand with trump,” Sulayem responded. It’s unclear if Epstein replied.

Saudi representatives declined to immediately respond to a request for comment, and the Russian Embassy in Washington didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. Jagland couldn’t be reached for comment and Sulayem didn’t respond to a request sent to what appeared to be his Instagram account.

Shia Kapos, Gregory Svirnovskiy, Cheyanne Daniels and Aaron Pellish contributed to this report.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113
Leaked classified DOJ memo 'sounds like an admission': defense expert


A new classified Justice Department memo announced Tuesday that U.S. troops are not liable in the deadly strikes on alleged drug-trafficking boats in Latin America, according to the Washington Post, and critics are raising red flags.

"The decision to pursue an opinion, drafted in July, reflects the heightened concerns within the government raised by senior civilian and military lawyers that such strikes would be illegal," the Post reports.


more

"The opinion also states that drug cartels are selling drugs to finance a campaign of violence in the U.S. in what appears to be an effort to shoehorn the fight against cartels into a law-of-war framework. Analysts are skeptical of this logic," says Post repoter John Hudson on X.

"It also argues the U.S. is in a 'non-international armed conflict' waged under Article II authorities," writesPost journalist JM Rieger on X.

The U.S. military has conducted at least 19 strikes in the Caribbean against alleged drug-smuggling vessels, including speedboats and a semi-submersible, with a death toll of 76, according to the Post.

The Pentagon deems this as compliant with the law.

"Current operations in the Caribbean are lawful under both U.S. and international law,” with all actions in “complete compliance with the law of armed conflict," says Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell.


more

Experts disagree.

"By framing the military campaign as a war, the administration is able to argue that murder statutes do not apply," Sarah Harrison, a senior analyst with the International Crisis Group and a former Pentagon lawyer, tells the Post.

“It sounds like an admission that there is no legal basis for these strikes," says Adam Isacson, the Director for Defense Oversight at the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), as reported by the Post's Hudson on X.

One military lawyer who goes by the name AspalsLegal on X writes, "I wonder if the courts would agree. How does the law of armed conflict apply to drug smugglers?"

The president, Harrison argues, “is fabricating a war so that he can get around the restrictions on lethal force during peacetime, like murder statutes.”
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113
Overweight foreigners ‘prevented from entering US’ thanks to Trump’s ‘obesity ban’


Overweight people are reportedly being denied immigration visas as a result of a direction from US President Donald Trump.

The State Department of Mr Trump issued a guidance recommending that overweight and obese people be denied immigration visas as part of obesity being several medical conditions that could be a part of an expense.

The medical conditions include: ‘cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, cancers, diabetes, metabolic diseases, neurological diseases and mental-health conditions.’



Overweight people are reportedly being denied immigration visas as a result of a direction from US President Donald Trump. Pic: Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
Immigration officials are told to ask: ‘Does the applicant have adequate financial resources to cover the costs of such care over his entire expected lifespan without seeking public cash assistance or long-term institutionalization at government expense?’

The guidance says being overweight can lead to asthma, sleep apnea and high blood pressure, which, in turn, ‘can require hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of care’ which could put strain on the US healthcare system.



more

A spokesman for the Trump administration confirmed that the directive was real, telling the Daily Mail: ‘It’s no secret the Trump administration is putting the interests of the American people first. This includes enforcing policies that ensure our immigration system is not a burden on the American taxpayer.’



Mr Trump’s administration have said that they will reject immigration visas for overweight people, citing a potential strain on the healthcare system. Pic: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images
The directive targets immigrant visas, but not non-immigrant 2-b visas that are obtained by people who can support their own medical treatment and who are going back to their own country.

The directive is also beefing up standards for those looking to obtain work visas, such as imposing a $100,000 a year fee to H-1B visas for skilled workers which companies are struggling to fill.



more

The visa has been criticised previously, but Mr Trump and his most ardent supporters, including Elon Musk, has claimed that they’re vital for attracting highly skilled global talent. The new order will only be required for new visa requests, with the payment to be required by companies for up to six years.



The Trump administration continue to beef up their immigration requirements. Pic: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images
A new ‘gold card’ was also designed to fast-track certain visas of people who are ‘willing to make a significant financial gift.’ Around 80,000 will be made available, with the administration saying that it’s currently in its ‘implementation phase.’
 

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
1,465
1,422
113
Overweight people are reportedly being denied immigration visas as a result of a direction from US President Donald Trump.
He stole this idea.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mandrill

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113
Former Tottenham owner Joe Lewis to be pardoned by Donald Trump


Former Tottenham Hotspur owner Joe Lewis is expected to be given an official pardon by US President Donald Trump.

The White House is due to publish Lewis’s pardon later on Thursday.

The British Billionaire, who handed ownership of the club to the Lewis Family Trust in 2022, was fined $5 million (£3.8 million) last year after he pleaded guilty to insider trading.

The Lewis family have assumed full operational control of Tottenham following the departure of executive chairman Daniel Levy in September.


British billionaire and former Tottenham Hotspur owner Joe Lewis is expected to be given an official pardon by President Donald Trump (Nick Potts/PA)

British billionaire and former Tottenham Hotspur owner Joe Lewis is expected to be given an official pardon by President Donald Trump (Nick Potts/PA)
Lewis will not return to the club, and it will continue to be run by the next generation of the Lewis family.

Lewis said: “I am pleased all of this is now behind me, and I can enjoy retirement and watch as my family and extended family continue to build our businesses based on the quality and pursuit of excellence that has become our trademark.”



more

A source close to the Lewis family added: “Joe and the Lewis family are extremely grateful for this pardon and would like to thank President Trump for taking this action.

“Over his long business career, Joe has been a visionary, creating businesses across the world which multiple generations of his family are now taking forward.

“This is why there is so much more to the Joe Lewis story than this one event.”
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113
James Comey and Letitia James press for dismissal of their cases, challenge prosecutor's appointment


ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — Lawyers for two of President Donald Trump's foes who have been charged by the Justice Department asked a judge on Thursday to dismiss the cases against them, saying the prosecutor who secured the indictments was illegally installed in the role.

U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie said she expects to decide by Thanksgiving on challenges to Lindsey Halligan’s appointment as interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. The cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, both shepherded by the hastily installed Halligan, have amplified concerns the Justice Department is being used as a weapon to target the Republican president's perceived adversaries.

more

Currie also disclosed in court that a record of grand jury proceedings in the Comey case that she reviewed was missing a portion, which she said raised questions about whether Attorney General Pam Bondi could have properly ratified the indictment as the Justice Department says she did.

Halligan was installed in the job at Trump's urging by Bondi in September, just days before Comey was indicted, in what defense lawyers say was a violation of complex constitutional and statutory roles governing the appointment of U.S. attorneys.

“Ms. Halligan was the sole prosecutor in the grand jury room, and when the sole prosecutor lacks the authority,” said Ephraim McDowell, one of Comey's defense lawyers, “that's not going to be a harmless error.”

U.S. attorneys, top federal prosecutors who oversee regional Justice Department outposts across the country, are typically nominated by the president and then confirmed by the Senate. Attorneys general have the authority to get around that process by naming an interim U.S. attorney who can serve for 120 days. But lawyers for Comey and James argued that once that period expires, the law gives federal judges the exclusive say of who gets to fill the vacancy.



Former FBI Director James Comey's attorney Abbe Lowell talks to reporters as he leaves the federal courthouse in Alexandria, Va., Thursday, Nov. 13, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)© The Associated Press
But that's not what happened in this instance.

The interim US attorney resigned under pressure

After then-interim U.S. attorney Erik Siebert resigned in September while facing Trump administration pressure to bring charges against Comey and James, Bondi installed Halligan, a White House aide with no prior prosecutorial experience. The appointment followed a Trump post on Truth Social in which he complained to her about the lack of prosecutorial action against his political enemies and said “JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!”



Former FBI Director James Comey's family leaves the federal courthouse in Alexandria, Va., Thursday, Nov. 13, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)© The Associated Press
Siebert had been appointed by Bondi in January to serve as interim U.S. attorney. Trump in May announced his intention to nominate him, and judges in the Eastern District unanimously agreed after his 120-day period expired that he should be retained in the role.

But after the Trump administration effectively pushed him out in September, the Justice Department again opted to make an interim appointment in place of the courts, something defense lawyers say it was not empowered under the law to do.

more

“If the government were to prevail here,” McDowell said, then it “would never need to go through Senate confirmation again for U.S. attorneys.” He said any dismissal of the indictment must be permanent, with no opportunity to bring the case again, to avoid rewarding the government for a violation.



Kate Comey daughter of former FBI Director James Comey, and Troy Edwards, Jr., arrive at federal courthouse in Alexandria, Va., Thursday, Nov. 13, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)© The Associated Press
The Justice Department defends Halligan's appointment

The Justice Department maintains that the law does not explicitly prevent successive appointments of interim U.S. attorneys by the attorney general. Henry Whitaker, a lawyer for the department, argued that the indictment was properly returned by a grand jury and should not be dismissed over what he described as at most a paperwork or clerical error.



more

“The grand jury made a decision based on the facts and the law, and they followed their oath,” Whitaker said.

He also said that even if there were questions about Halligan's appointment, they were resolved by the fact that Bondi had personally ratified the indictment and reviewed the grand jury proceedings. But Currie, the judge, questioned whether that was possible given that a section of the grand jury proceedings that were produced to her was, for unexplained reasons, missing a section.



Patrice Failor, wife of former FBI Director James Comey, center, Claire Comey, right, and Maurene Comey, left, both daughters of former FBI Director James Comey, arrive at federal courthouse in Alexandria, Va., Thursday, Nov. 13, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)© The Associated Press
Comey has pleaded not guilty to charges of making a false statement and obstructing Congress, and James, a Democrat, has pleaded not guilty to mortgage fraud allegations. The challenges to Halligan’s appointment are part of a multiprong effort to get the prosecutions tossed before trial. Their lawyers have separately argued that the prosecutions are improperly vindictive and motivated by the president’s personal animus toward their clients and should therefore be dismissed.


Patrice Failor, wife of former FBI Director James Comey, center, Claire Comey, right, and Maurene Comey, left, both daughters of former FBI Director James Comey, arrive at federal courthouse in Alexandria, Va., Thursday, Nov. 13, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Patrice Failor, wife of former FBI Director James Comey, center, Claire Comey, right, and Maurene Comey, left, both daughters of former FBI Director James Comey, arrive at federal courthouse in Alexandria, Va., Thursday, Nov. 13, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)© The Associated Press
Trump's history with Comey and James

Comey, as FBI director in the early months of Trump’s first term, infuriated the president through his oversight of an investigation into potential ties between Russia and Trump’s 2016 campaign. Trump fired Comey in May 2017. The two have been open adversaries since, with Comey labeling Trump “unethical” and comparing him to a Mafia boss and Trump branding Comey an “untruthful slime ball” and calling for him to be punished because of the Russia investigation.


James has been a frequent target of Trump’s ire, especially since she won a staggering judgment against him and the Trump Organization in a lawsuit alleging he defrauded banks by overstating the value of his real estate holdings on financial statements. An appeals court overturned the fine, which had ballooned to more than $500 million with interest, but upheld a lower court’s finding that Trump had committed fraud.

Eric Tucker, The Associated Press
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113
Supreme Court justice cuts off Trump lawyer in tense exchange


The Supreme Court turned into a daytime drama as Solicitor General John Sauer struggled to answer Justice Amy Coney Barrett. After he repeatedly dodged a specific question, one justice had clearly reached her limit.

Trump’s case


The Supreme Court heard a case challenging Trump’s emergency tariff powers. (MEGA)© Knewz (CA)
The Supreme Court reviewed a case challenging President Donald Trump’s power to impose broad tariffs under emergency authority. CNN’s The Situation Room aired the proceedings live, during which Justice Barrett’s question appeared to derail Sauer, leading Justice Sonia Sotomayor to demand a clear response.

One question


Justice Barrett pressed Sauer about tariff authority. (MEGA)© Knewz (CA)
Justice Barrett challenged Sauer on a technical but important point about tariff authority. “Can you point to any other place in the code or any other time in history where that phrase ‘together, regulate importation,’ has been used to confer tariff imposing authority?” she asked. Sauer began to respond, saying, “Well, as to regulated importation, that was held in TWEA, so obviously, and that’s…” But Barrett quickly cut him off, scrutinizing Sauer’s prior statements to Justice Brett Kavanaugh. “Okay, so an intermediate appellate court held it in TWEA, but you just told Justice Kavanaugh that wasn’t your lead argument, that your lead argument was this long history of the phrase ‘regulate importation’ being understood to include tariff authority,” she said. Going back to her original question, she asked again, “Has there ever been another instance in which a statute has conferred, used that language to confer the power?”

Back and forth


Barrett wanted him to distinguish between general language and tariff authority. (MEGA)© Knewz (CA)
Sauer attempted to cite historical cases to support his argument, but Barrett interrupted, pressing him to distinguish between general language and tariff authority. Justice Barrett interjected, “That just shows the word can be used that way. None of those cases talked about it as conferring tariff authority.” Sauer clarified the reasoning behind his references, stating, “I think our argument goes a bit further than that as interpretive matter, because if you look at that history, the history of delegations…”

Final answer


Justice Sotomayor, who was visibly frustrated, intervened. (MEGA)© Knewz (CA)
Justice Sotomayor, who was visibly frustrated, intervened to get Sauer back on track. “Could you just answer the justice’s question?” she asked. Barrett pressed for examples, and Sauer finally identified two statutes. “Yeah, the only two statutes I can identify now are TWEA … and then closely related, not ‘regulated importation,’ but ‘adjust imports’ in section 232.” Barrett differentiated between them and clarified, “Well, I think ‘adjust imports’ [means something different]. So the answer is the contested application in TWEA and then now in IEEEPA.” Sauer agreed with the line of reasoning. “And then, of course, I mean, those are there’s a sort of direct line there,” he claimed.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113
Trump appointee finding it 'difficult to retaliate' as her office revolts: ex-US attorney


Donald Trump appointee Lindsey Halligan’s ability to prosecute critics of the president is being sorely tested on Thursday as she faced a hearing on whether she was legally hired into her position at the same time that investigators and lawyers in her Virginia office have refused to work with her.

more

Halligan is facing a claim that her appointment does not pass legal muster after she rushed to bring criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.



With Halligan's job on the line before U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie, who has already called the attorney out for withholding grand jury information, former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance claimed the Trump appointee has been left hanging by staffers at the Eastern District of Virginia where she was appointed on an interim basis as a U.S. attorney by Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Discussing the unfolding situation with host Anna Cabrera, Vance explained, “I think we know by the virtue of the fact that Halligan is the lone signature on this case, when it comes out of grand jury, it seems clear that prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia have realized that their strength is in unity, and when they band together and simply refuse to participate in an illegitimate exercise of the justice department's power, it's very difficult for her to retaliate.”


“And, Anna, you said something here that's so important that she had a rapid ascent to this position,” she added. “She is, of course, as has been widely discussed, an insurance lawyer and not a prosecutor, and bringing federal prosecutions in particularly one like this, is a real trap for the unwary.”

“So when the judge gets her hands on grand jury transcripts and is able to see what Halligan said to grand jurors, a whole host of new problems could emerge,” Vance predicted.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113
Supreme Court mocks Trump lawyer for calling climate change a hoax


As the Supreme Court weighed Donald Trump’s use of presidential powers, Solicitor General John Sauer broke the tension by repeating Trump’s claim that climate change is a “hoax.” Justice Neil Gorsuch’s quick-witted response made the courtroom exchange one to remember.

Emergency powers


Gorsuch focused on the limits of Trump’s authority. (MEGA)© Knewz (CA)
As the Supreme Court reviewed Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose broad tariffs, Justice Gorsuch focused on the limits of that authority. His climate change hypothetical, aired live on CNN’s The Situation Room, pressed the Trump lawyer to defend how far presidential power could go.

Broad powers


Gorsuch challenged the idea that Congress could grant the president broad powers. (MEGA)© Knewz (CA)
As the debate heated up, Justice Gorsuch challenged the idea that Congress could grant the president broad powers. “What’s the reason to accept the notion that Congress can hand off the power to declare war to the president?” Gorsuch asked. “We don’t contend that again,” Sauer responded. “You do, you say it’s unreviewable, there’s no manageable standard, nothing to be done. Tell me if I’m wrong, you backed off that position,” the justice said. “Maybe that’s fair to say,” Sauer replied. “Okay, alright. Thank you,” Gorsuch said, prompting laughter from the room.

Back and forth exchange


Gorsuch turned to climate change to test Sauer’s argument. (MEGA)© Knewz (CA)
The exchange continued with Sauer defending the administration’s view. “That would be, I think, an abdication. That would really be an abdication, not a delegation,” Sauer said. “I’m delighted to hear that you know,” Gorsuch replied, again prompting laughter. Justice Gorsuch then turned to the subject of climate change to test the limits of Sauer’s argument. “Could the president impose a 50 percent tariff on gas-powered cars and auto parts to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat from abroad of climate change?” he asked.

Climate change hypothetical


Gorsuch pressed Sauer on how the administration might handle a climate emergency. (MEGA)© Knewz (CA)
Sauer responded to Gorsuch’s line of questioning, “It’s very likely that that could be done.” The justice hit back, “I think that has to be the logic of your view.” Gorsuch then pressed Sauer on how the current administration might handle a climate emergency. “In other words, obviously this administration would say that’s a hoax, it’s not a real crisis, but…” Sauer said, before Gorsuch interjected, “I’m sure you would!” More laughter filled the room. “Yes, but that would be a question for Congress under our interpretation, not for the courts,” Sauer rebutted.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113
Pam Bondi's new cover-up attempt called out by judge


U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi on Thursday was called out by a judge for attempting to fix a legal paperwork error by lying on documents, according to a former federal prosecutor.

Ex-prosecutor Joyce Vance wrote a Substack piece called "Prosecuting Comey," in which she notes that on Thursday in Alexandria, Virginia, "a senior federal judge from South Carolina, Cameron Currie, heard oral argument on consolidated motions filed by former FBI Director Jim Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James in their separate criminal prosecutions."



"Both of them filed motions challenging the legitimacy of Trump’s insurance-lawyer-turned-U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan’s role in their prosecution," she explained. "Appearing for the Justice Department, attorney Henry Whitaker told the court that any questions about the appointment of Halligan involved, at worst, mere paperwork errors. Whitaker was the Florida Solicitor General until earlier this year. He clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas after law school and worked in the Office of Legal Counsel during the first Trump administration."

Then, Vance touched on Bondi's problem:


"Perhaps anticipating problems with the validity of Halligan’s appointment, Attorney General Pam Bondi tried to back-bless the indictments, filing that she had reviewed the grand jury proceedings. But the Judge pointed out this morning that wasn’t possible because they hadn’t been fully transcribed."


Vance further added, "And, while every attorney general would likely have loved to possess a magic wand that would permit them to fix errors after the fact, that’s not how any of this works."

"Prosecutors must follow the rules, which are in place to ensure that defendants’ rights are protected and justice is done," she said. "Cases are dismissed when they make procedural errors, in part to protect them and in part to deter prosecutors from making future errors. If ever an attorney general needed that sort of a reminder from the courts, it’s this one."

Read the full piece here.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113
Trump cuts tariffs on beef, coffee and other foods as inflation concerns mount


WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order to exempt a wide range of food imports, including beef, tomatoes, coffee and bananas, from sweeping tariffs imposed earlier this year on nearly every country, the White House said.


more

The order is part of a major push by Trump and his top officials to address Americans' growing concerns about persistently high grocery prices.

The new exemptions - which take effect retroactively at midnight on Thursday - mark a sharp reversal for Trump, who has long insisted that his import duties are not fueling inflation. They come after a string of victories for Democrats in state and local elections in Virginia, New Jersey and New York City, where affordability was a key topic.

It said any refunds due would be processed under the rules and procedures of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Trump has upended the global trading system by imposing a 10% base tariffs on imports from every country, plus additional specific duties that vary from state to state.

Friday's ordered followed framework trade deals announced on Thursday that will eliminate tariffs on certain foods and other items imported from Argentina, Ecuador, Guatemala and El Salvador, once those deals are finalized, with U.S. officials eyeing additional deals for signing before year's end.


more

Trump has focused squarely on the issue of affordability in recent weeks, while insisting that any higher costs were triggered by policies enacted by former President Joe Biden, and not his own tariff policies.

Consumers have remained frustrated over high grocery prices, which economists say have been fueled in part by import tariffs and could rise further next year as companies start passing on the full brunt of the import duties.

The top Democrats on the House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee, Richard Neal, said the Trump administration was "putting out a fire that they started and claiming it as progress."

“The Trump Administration is finally admitting publicly what we’ve all known from the start: Trump’s Trade War is hiking costs on people," Neal said in a statement. "Since implementing these tariffs, inflation has increased and manufacturing has contracted month after month."

(Reporting by Andrea Shalal and Costas Pitas;Editing by Dan Burns)
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,381
113
Pam Bondi complies as Trump demands she target Dems with new Epstein probe


Attorney General Pam Bondi said that the Department of Justice would open a new investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's ties to Democrats after President Donald Trump ordered her to on social media.

After Democrats released emails in which Epstein said Trump "knew about the girls" who were being abused, the president lashed out in a Truth Social post on Friday.




"Now that the Democrats are using the Epstein Hoax, involving Democrats, not Republicans, to try and deflect from their disastrous SHUTDOWN, and all of their other failures, I will be asking A.G. Pam Bondi, and the Department of Justice, together with our great patriots at the FBI, to investigate Jeffrey Epstein's involvement and relationship with Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, Reid Hoffman, J.P. Morgan, Chase, and many other people and institutions, to determine what was going on with them, and him," the president wrote.

Before the end of the day, Bondi responded to the order.




"Thank you, Mr. President," Bondi replied on X. "SDNY U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton is one of the most capable and trusted prosecutors in the country, and I've asked him to take the lead. As with all matters, the Department will pursue this with urgency and integrity to deliver answers to the American people."




more

Julie Brown, the longtime journalist whose investigation led to the arrest of Epstein, has suggested that an open inquiry could prevent the Justice Department from releasing files on the sex offender.

"Generally, it's not a good idea to open your evidence files when a criminal case is ongoing," she explained recently.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts