Blondie Massage Spa

update - appeal court strikes down TX 2025 gerrymandered electoral map

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,377
113
US military's 20th strike on alleged drug-running boat kills 4 in the Caribbean


WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. military's 20th strike on a boat accused of transporting drugs has killed four people in the Caribbean Sea, the U.S. military said Friday, coming as the Trump administration escalates its campaign in South American waters.

The latest strike happened Monday, according to a social media post on Friday by U.S. Southern Command, which oversees military operations in the Caribbean and Latin America. The latest strike brings the death toll from the attacks that began in September to 80, with the Mexican Navy suspending its search for a survivor of a strike in late October after four days.




more

Southern Command's post on X shows a boat speeding over water before it's engulfed in flames. The command said intelligence confirmed the vessel “was involved in illicit narcotics smuggling, transiting along a known narco-trafficking route, and carrying narcotics.”

Southern Command's post marked a shift away from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's practice of typically announcing the attacks on social media, although he quickly reposted Southern Command's statement.

Hegseth had announced the previous two strikes on Monday after they had been carried out on Sunday. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is expanding the U.S. military's already large presence in the region by bringing in the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier. The nation's most advanced warship is expected to arrive in the coming days after traveling from the Mediterranean Sea.


The USS Gravely destroyer arrives to dock for military exercises in Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, Sunday, Oct. 26, 2025. (AP Photo/Robert Taylor)

The USS Gravely destroyer arrives to dock for military exercises in Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, Sunday, Oct. 26, 2025. (AP Photo/Robert Taylor)© The Associated Press
Hegseth on Thursday formally named the mission “Operation Southern Spear,” emphasizing the growing significance and permanence of the military’s presence in the region. Once the Ford arrives, the mission will encompass nearly a dozen Navy ships as well about 12,000 sailors and Marines.




more

The Trump administration has insisted that the buildup of warships is focused on stopping the flow of drugs into the U.S., but it has released no evidence to support its assertions that those killed in the boats were “narcoterrorists.” The strikes have targeted vessels largely in the Caribbean Sea but also have taken place in the eastern Pacific Ocean, where much of the cocaine from the world’s largest producers is smuggled.

Some observers say the aircraft carrier is a big new tool of intimidation against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who faces charges of narcoterrorism in the U.S. Experts disagree on whether American warplanes may bomb land targets to pressure Maduro to step down.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the U.S. doesn’t recognize Maduro, who was widely accused of stealing last year’s election, as the leader of Venezuela and has called the government a “transshipment organization” that openly cooperates with those trafficking drugs toward the U.S.






more

Maduro has said the U.S. government is “fabricating” a war against him. Venezuela’s government this week touted a “massive” mobilization of troops and civilians to defend against possible U.S. attacks.

Trump has justified the attacks by saying the United States is in “armed conflict” with drug cartels and claiming the boats are operated by foreign terror organizations that are flooding America’s cities with drugs.

Lawmakers, including Republicans, have pressed for more information on who is being targeted and the legal justification for the strikes.

Rubio and Hegseth met with a bipartisan group of lawmakers who oversee national security issues last week, providing one of the first high-level glimpses into the legal rationale and strategy behind the strikes.

Senate Republicans voted a day later to reject legislation that would have put a check on Trump’s ability to launch an attack against Venezuela without congressional authorization.

Ben Finley, The Associated Press
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,377
113


A unanimous Nevada Supreme Court on Thursday revived the criminal case against six prominent allies of President Donald Trump who falsely claimed to be legitimate presidential electors amid Trump’s effort to subvert the 2020 election.
The justices concluded that Attorney General Aaron Ford properly brought the forgery case in Las Vegas, overruling a lower-court decision that found the case should have been brought in Carson City, where the pro-Trump elector nominees signed the false documents.


The 6-0 decision comes just days after Trump pardoned dozens of allies — including the six defendants in Nevada — for any potential federal crimes related to the 2020 election. However, the president’s pardon power does not extend to state-level offenses like those brought by Ford.

Among those facing forgery charges — which carry a maximum five-year penalty — are the state’s sitting GOP chairman Michael McDonald, his vice chair Jim Hindle and the state’s Republican National Committeeman Jim DeGraffenreid.

At the urging of the Trump campaign in 2020, dozens of Republican activists in seven swing states signed certificates claiming to be legitimate presidential electors — though each of the battlegrounds went for Joe Biden. Many were told by party and campaign leadership that the paperwork was a legal necessity to ensure that their electoral votes would be counted if Trump prevailed in any of his court challenges to the election results.

However, top Trump advisers at the time were also planning to use the false certificates to pressure then-Vice President Mike Pence to derail Biden’s victory when Congress met to count ballots on Jan. 6, 2021. Pence, however, refused to recognize the GOP-signed certificates because they were not certified by the states’ governors or legislatures, depriving them of any legal or constitutional legitimacy.
The continuation of the case, nearly five years after the elector certificates were signed, stands in contrast to the fate of a similar criminal case brought by Michigan prosecutors against 16 Republicans who took part in the same effort. A judge there dismissed the case in September, saying the evidence failed to show the defendants acted with criminal intent.

A criminal case in Arizona against the state’s 10 false GOP electors remains in limbo as Attorney General Kris Mayes contends with the trial judge’s ruling that the grand jury proceedings were flawed. In Wisconsin, another criminal case remains pending against three leaders of the Trump campaign’s elector effort. A fourth case in Georgia has been largely derailed after the state supreme court disqualified Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from continuing to preside due to an alleged conflict of interest.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,377
113
Donald Trump to sue the BBC for up to €5billion after ‘egregious’ video edit


US President Donald Trump has shared that he plans to sue the BBC after their ‘egregious’ video edit of one of his speeches.
On November 10, the BBC apologised for giving the impression that Trump had directly encouraged ‘violent action’ just before the January 6 Capitol riots in Washington DC in a documentary that aired last year.
The controversy around the video edit even led to the BBC director-general and some of the organisation’s top news executive to resign, with the president saying that he doesn’t accept that it was ‘unintentional’.


US President Donald Trump waves from Air Force One Pic: Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
He said: ‘We’ll sue them for anywhere between a billion and five billion dollars, probably some time next week. I think I have to do it. They’ve even admitted that they cheated.’
He added that the group ‘changed the words’ that were coming out of his mouth, and that the wants to know why Panorama edited the two clips of his speech together to give his words a ‘totally different meaning’.
Trump’s lawyers sent the BBC a letter giving it until Friday to apologise and pay compensation, with chairman Samir Shah sending a ‘personal letter to the White house’ on Thursday.


Donald Trump Pic: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images
They said that ‘he and the corporation are sorry for the edit of the president’s speech,’ adding: ‘While the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim.’
President Trump said that he plans to bring up the issue with British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who up until now had backed the broadcaster’s independence while avoiding taking sides agaist the US leader.
more

Donald Trump added that Starmer had already called him and was ‘very embarrassed’ by the situation, and also referred to the BBC as ‘fake news’.
The BBC’s annual income from the licence fee was £3.8bn in 2024, which is around $5bn, so if found guilty and forced to pay the full amount, it could amount to a whole year’s worth of licence fee income.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,377
113
Detainees deported by Trump to El Salvador tell of prison torture


“They kept hitting me in the stomach, and when I tried to breathe, I started to choke on the blood. My cellmates shouted for help, saying they were killing us, but the officers said they just wanted to make us suffer.”



more

The harrowing testimony of Daniel B* is among dozens collected by human rights groups since the 252 Venezuelan migrants were repatriated from one of El Salvador’s most notorious prisons in July this year.

Five months earlier, they had been deported there from the US as part of Donald Trump’s much-publicised migration crackdown.

El Salvador’s maximum security Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT) has become emblematic of strongman president Nayib Bukele’s brutal crackdown on organised crime in recent years. Bukele boasts of the project, sharing curated images of guards hauling shaven prisoners through the compound as evidence of his triumph over the gangs.

But Bukele’s prison goes beyond taking El Salvador’s most dangerous off the streets, monitoring groups warn. CECOT has been branded a “black hole of human rights” amid reports of overcrowding, arbitrary beatings and the denial of any contact with the outside world.




more

Prisoners are sent to CECOT with the expectation that they will never leave.

A rare insight into this bleak reality came when Human Rights Watch (HRW) spoke to many of those released back to Venezuela.

Its report, published this week, claimed that while inside the prison, detainees were subjected to sexual violence; beaten for requesting medical treatment; held in incommunicado detention; and given water for bathing and drinking containing vermin and worms.

CECOT was built in 2023 against the backdrop of Mr Bukele’s “State of Exception”, a legal framework that allowed the president to suspend certain constitutional rights as part of a broader campaign against gang violence.

Decades of lawlessness in El Salvador forced an exodus of people north, often towards the United States. Politicians until now offered few solutions. That was until former advertising executive Mr Bukele cracked down on the gang, and the homicide rate fell fast.



more

International observers, including Freedom House and Amnesty International, warn that Mr Bukele’s policies have seen thousands of arbitrary detentions, the use of torture in detention centres, and hundreds of deaths under state custody.

A third of those detained under the State of Exception are estimated to be innocent, according to the Socorro Juridico Humanitario rights group.

The HRW report featured testimonies of Venezuelans deported to El Salvador from the United States in March and April. It includes harrowing accounts of alleged “systematic” abuse in custody over the next four months.

Gonzalo Y* said that when they landed in El Salvador they were taken off the plane and told to kneel with their heads down. When he tried to explain that he had a spinal condition affecting his mobility, he said he was struck in the neck with a baton. When they arrived at the prison, they were told to kneel again so that they could be shaved.


File. Prisoners are crammed into tiny cells and entirely exposed (Reuters)

File. Prisoners are crammed into tiny cells and entirely exposed (Reuters)
“One of the officers hit me on the legs with a baton, and I fell to the ground on my knees.” Another inmate said the prisoner director told them, “You have arrived in hell.”

The testimonies went on to corroborate past reports about the gruelling conditions inside the prison. Inmates are reportedly confined to cells for all but 30 minutes a day, forbidden from going outside, and made to sleep on steel beds without mattresses.


“The conditions were horrific,” said Julian G*, a 29-year-old athlete: “There was mould, the floor was black and sticky, the toilets were filthy, it smelled of urine, and the water we had in the tanks – used both for bathing and for drinking – was yellow and had worms.”

Another detainee said they were never given a change of clothes. They said they were given soap once a week, but never enough to clean everything with.

Every former detainee, they said, reported serious physical and psychological abuse on a near-daily basis.

Three told the investigating rights groups that they had been subjected to sexual violence. One alleged four guards had sexually abused him and forced him to perform oral sex on one of them.

Most interviewees told HRW that medical staff at the prison provided little to no care. Thirty-seven of the 40 former detainees said they fell ill during their time at CECOT.


Some 252 Venezuelans were repatriated from El Salvador as part of a prisoner exchange on July 18 (Getty)

Some 252 Venezuelans were repatriated from El Salvador as part of a prisoner exchange on July 18 (Getty)
Former detainees also spoke of the psychological trauma that life in the prison had brought.

Flavio T* said that the “hardest part” of detention was that the guards “told us we would never get out of there, that our families had given us up for dead”.

Former detainees described a short-lived revolt against the guards in the form of a hunger strike. In May, inmates stopped eating for three days in the hopes of pressuring guards to stop the beatings.


On the first day, some also organised a “blood strike”, cutting themselves with a sharpened piece of aluminium found in a water tank and using the blood to write “we are migrants, not terrorists” on a bed sheet to be raised as a banner.

They said a government official promised there would be no more beatings, but they continued.

The detainees were finally released from CECOT prison in July. Two or three days before they left, they said guards brought in mattresses and dentists, cleaning them up for the world’s cameras.

Abigail Jackson, White House spokesperson, told The Independent: “President Trump is committed to keeping his promises to the American people by removing dangerous criminal and terrorist illegal aliens who pose a threat to the American public. The mainstream media should spend their time and energy amplifying the stories of Angel Parents, whose innocent American children have tragically been murdered by vicious illegal aliens that President Trump is removing from the country.”
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,377
113
I’m a Brit detained by ICE. Conditions were so poor I couldn’t believe it was America


A British political commentator who was held in US immigration custody for more than two weeks has described the squalid conditions he experienced in a California detention facility.

Sami Hamdi was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers at San Francisco International Airport in California on 26 October after travelling to the country for a speaking tour about US support for Israel’s war in Gaza.



more

He spent the next 18 days in a detention facility, sleeping in a hall with around 90 other people also facing deportation as part of the US Government’s sweeping immigration crackdown.

After a battle in the courts, Hamdi was released earlier this week and allowed to return to the UK, landing in London on Thursday.

Speaking to The i Paper, he described how he was first approached at San Francisco International Airport by an official from Homeland Security, who informed him that his visa had been revoked two days previously, without giving a reason.

“Then, suddenly, four other officers surrounded me,” Hamdi said. The 35-year-old was escorted to a black car with tinted windows, handcuffed and driven to a processing centre half an hour away, then transferred to a cell inside a custody van.


Hamdi (right), being greeted by family members at Heathrow Airport (Photo: Free Sami Hamdi campaign/PA)

Hamdi (right), being greeted by family members at Heathrow Airport (Photo: Free Sami Hamdi campaign/PA)
After a two-hour drive, he arrived at the the Golden State Annex, a privately-run former prison in McFarland that now serves as California’s largest migrant detention facility, with space for up to 2,560 individuals.

Inmates are held in large halls, where they sleep alongside each other in bunkbeds.



more

“It was clearly overcrowded,” Hamdi said. “There were more than 90 people but not enough pillows, enough blankets and the like.”

“The other inmates immediately rushed to me and said ‘listen, the food here is terrible. It’s going to make you really sick.'”

After eating a meal he described as “slop” that evening, Hamdi woke at 5am with an “agonising” pain in his left side. “I genuinely believed I burst a kidney or something, or that I’d messed my spleen up,” he said.



Hamdi said his request for a doctor was ignored for three hours until his wife alerted the media to his condition.

“The inmates said that anyone who enters the facility suffers the same pain I suffered in the first two weeks,” he added. “I’m not expecting fresh food in a prison facility, but it certainly looked off.”



more

In July, NBC news reported that immigration lawyers had received several complaints from clients held in detention facilities across California, about the food being “inedible” and in one case “mouldy.”

California’s detention centres are run by The GEO Group XXX

Hamdi was placed in shackles and driven to an ICE facility in Fresno, a city in the San Joaquin Valley of California, on three occasions to be shown documentation relating to his case.

In Fresno, he said he was held in a cramped room with around 20 other detainees for up to 24 hours at a time before being seen by officials.

“There was a stone bench or the hard floor. They just tell you, ‘sleep here until Ice come in the morning’.”

Detainees were forced to share an open toilet, Hamdi said. “You can smell it across the whole cell… honestly, I could not believe it was America,” he said.


Hamdi faced a single allegation of overstaying his visa, which had been revoked without his knowledge days prior to his detention.

The State Department and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has accused him of supporting terrorism, sharing a video by the pro-Israel organisation Memri, in which Hamdi appeared to praise the 7 October 2023 attacks on Israel, calling on his audience to not “pity” Palestinians but to “celebrate their victory”.

Hamdi insists his views were misrepresented by the edited montage, and that he condemned violence at the same speaking engagement the clips were taken from.

The California chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (Cair-CA), whose lawyers challenged Hamdi’s detention in federal court, said he was held due to his support for Palestine and “punished for criticising Israel, not for any alleged wrongdoing”.


On Monday, they reached an agreement with the US Government that Hamdi would leave the country voluntarily.

Hamdi said he is allowed to apply for a new visa and plans to return to the US with nothing on his record.

“The Federal court system still works”, he added. “Federal judges still take seriously the issue of freedom of speech, and there is a growing perception amongst Americans that their freedom of speech is under attack. I think that worked in my favour.

“If you’re prepared to ride out that pressure, then most certainly, and this is the point I made, eventually you win. The issue is whether you have the stomach to go through it.”

Asked whether anyone who had publicly expressed pro-Palestinian views should be concerned about travelling to the US, Hamdi said: “I think they should be aware that there is a possibility that there would be a similar situation.”
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,377
113
Judge indefinitely bars Trump from fining University of California over alleged discrimination


The Trump administration cannot fine the University of California or summarily cut the school system's federal funding over claims it allows antisemitism or other forms of discrimination, a federal judge ruled late Friday in a sharply worded decision.

U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco issued a preliminary injunction barring the administration from cancelling funding to UC based on alleged discrimination without giving notice to affected faculty and conducting a hearing, among other requirements.



more

The administration over the summer demanded the University of California, Los Angeles pay $1.2 billion to restore frozen research funding and ensure eligibility for future funding after accusing the school of allowing antisemitism on campus. UCLA was the first public university to be targeted by the administration over allegations of civil rights violations.

It has also frozen or paused federal funding over similar claims against private colleges, including Columbia University.

In her ruling, Lin said labor unions and other groups representing UC faculty, students and employees had provided “overwhelming evidence” that the Trump administration was “engaged in a concerted campaign to purge ‘woke,’ ‘left,’ and ‘socialist’ viewpoints from our country’s leading universities."

“Agency officials, as well as the President and Vice President, have repeatedly and publicly announced a playbook of initiating civil rights investigations of preeminent universities to justify cutting off federal funding, with the goal of bringing universities to their knees and forcing them to change their ideological tune,” Lin wrote.



more

She added, "It is undisputed that this precise playbook is now being executed at the University of California."

At UC, which is facing a series of civil rights probes, she found the administration had engaged in “coercive and retaliatory conduct in violation of the First Amendment and Tenth Amendment.”

Messages sent to the White House and the U.S. Department of Justice after hours Friday were not immediately returned. Lin's order will remain in effect indefinitely.

University of California President James B. Milliken has said the size of the UCLA fine would devastate the UC system, whose campuses are viewed as some of the top public colleges in the nation.

UC is in settlement talks with the administration and is not a party to the lawsuit before Lin, who was nominated to the bench by President Joe Biden, a Democrat. In a statement, the university system said it “remains committed to protecting the mission, governance, and academic freedom of the University.”



more

The administration has demanded UCLA comply with its views on gender identity and establish a process to make sure foreign students are not admitted if they are likely to engage in anti-American, anti-Western or antisemitic “disruptions or harassment,” among other requirements outlined in a settlement proposal made public in October.

The administration has previously struck deals with Brown University for $50 million and Columbia University for $221 million.

Lin cited declarations by UC faculty and staff that the administration’s moves were prompting them to stop teaching or researching topics they were “afraid were too ‘left’ or ‘woke.’”

Her injunction also blocks the administration from “conditioning the grant or continuance of federal funding on the UC’s agreement to any measures that would violate the rights of Plaintiffs’ members under the First Amendment.”


She cited efforts to force the UCs to screen international students based on “’anti-Western” or “‘anti-American’” views, restrict research and teaching, or adopt specific definitions of “male” and “female” as examples of such measures.

President Donald Trump has decried elite colleges as overrun by liberalism and antisemitism.

His administration has launched investigations of dozens of universities, claiming they have failed to end the use of racial preferences in violation of civil rights law. The Republican administration says diversity, equity and inclusion efforts discriminate against white and Asian American students.

Sudhin Thanawala, The Associated Press
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,377
113
Justice Department quietly replaced 'identical' Trump signatures on recent pardons


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department posted pardons online bearing identical copies of President Donald Trump’s signature before quietly correcting them this week after what the agency called a “technical error.”

The replacements came after online commenters seized on striking similarities in the president's signature across a series of pardons dated Nov. 7, including those granted to former New York Mets player Darryl Strawberry, former Tennessee House speaker Glen Casada and former New York police sergeant Michael McMahon. In fact, the signatures on several pardons initially uploaded to the Justice Department's website were identical, two forensic document experts confirmed to The Associated Press.



more

Within hours of the online speculation, the administration replaced copies of the pardons with new ones that did not feature identical signatures. It insisted Trump, who mercilessly mocked his predecessor’s use of an autopen, had originally signed all the Nov. 7 pardons himself and blamed “technical” and staffing issues for the error, which has no bearing on the validity of the clemency actions.

The questions about Trump’s signature come amid a new flurry of clemency and weeks after the president claimed to not even know Changpeng Zhao, a crypto billionaire he pardoned last month. He said in an interview with 60 Minutes that the case had been “a Biden witch hunt.”

“A basic axiom of handwriting identification science is that no two signatures are going to bear the exact same design features in every aspect,” said Tom Vastrick, a Florida-based handwriting expert who is president of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners.



more

“It’s very straightforward,” said Vastrick, who compared the apparently identical images, now only visible through the online Internet Archive, with the replacements at AP’s request.

Chad Gilmartin, a Justice Department spokesperson, said the “website was updated after a technical error where one of the signatures President Trump personally signed was mistakenly uploaded multiple times due to staffing issues caused by the Democrat shutdown.”

“There is no story here other than the fact that President Trump signed seven pardons by hand and DOJ posted those same seven pardons with seven unique signatures to our website,” Gilmartin said in a statement to AP, referring to the latest wave of clemency Trump has granted in recent weeks.

White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson wrote in an email that Trump “signed each one of these pardons by hand as he does with all pardons.”



more

“The media should spend their time investigating Joe Biden’s countless auto penned pardons, not covering a non-story,” she wrote.

Trump has been an outspoken critic of Biden's use of the autopen to conduct executive business, going as far as to display a picture of one such device in place of a portrait of his predecessor in a new “Presidential Walk of Fame” he created along the West Wing colonnade. His Republican allies in Congress last month released a blistering critique of Biden's alleged “diminished faculties” and mental state during his term that ranked the Democrat’s use of the autopen among “the greatest scandals in U.S. history.”

The Republicans said their findings cast doubt on all of Biden’s actions in office and sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi urging a full investigation.

“Senior White House officials did not know who operated the autopen and its use was not sufficiently controlled or documented to prevent abuse,” the House Oversight Committee found. “The Committee deems void all executive actions signed by the autopen without proper, corresponding, contemporaneous, written approval traceable to the president’s own consent.”


On Friday, Republicans who control the committee released a statement that characterized Trump’s potential use of an electronic signature as legitimate, which it distinguished from Biden’s.

But Rep. Dave Min, a California Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, seized on the apparent similarities in the initial version of the pardons and called for an investigation of the matter, deploying the Republican arguments against Biden in a statement to AP that “we need to better understand who is actually in charge of the White House, because Trump seems to be slipping.”

Regardless, legal experts say the use of an autopen has no bearing on the validity of the pardons.

“The key to pardon validity is whether the president intended to grant the pardon,” said Frank Bowman, a legal historian and professor emeritus at the University of Missouri School of Law who is writing a book on pardons. “Any re-signing is an obvious, and rather silly, effort to avoid comparison to Biden.”


Much of Trump’s mercy has gone to political allies, campaign donors and fraudsters who claimed they were victims of a “weaponized” Justice Department. Trump has largely cast aside a process that historically has been overseen by nonpolitical personnel at the Justice Department.

Casada, a disgraced former Republican speaker of the Tennessee House, was sentenced in September to three years in prison. He was convicted of working with a former legislative aide to win taxpayer-funded mail business from state lawmakers who previously drove Casada from office amid a sexting scandal.

Strawberry was convicted in the 1990s of tax evasion and drug charges. Trump cited the 1983 National League Rookie of the Year’s post-career embrace of his Christian faith and longtime sobriety when pardoning him.

McMahon, a former New York City police sergeant, was sentenced this spring to 18 months in prison for his role in what a federal judge called “a campaign of transnational repression.” He was convicted of acting as a foreign agent for China after he tried to scare an ex-official into going back to his homeland.


McMahon’s defense attorney, Lawrence Lustberg, said he was not aware the pardon documents had been replaced until he was contacted Friday by an AP reporter.

“It is and has always been our understanding that President Trump granted Mr. McMahon his pardon,” Lustberg wrote in an email.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,377
113
The UK has seen enough US boat strikes


UK limits intel to US as legally disputed strikes on alleged drug boats push death toll to 75.

Concerns


Concerns© Getty Images
As the Pentagon announces new strikes on boats the Trump administration alleges are operated by drug cartels smuggling narcotics toward the United States, concerns around the operation are mounting.

The legality


The legality© Getty Images
CNN is now reporting that the UK has halted some intelligence sharing with Washington over the legality of the campaign, which has left a total of 75 people dead since it began in September.

Highly questionable


Highly questionable© Getty Images
According to CNN, British officials have quietly suspended the sharing of certain intelligence on suspected drug-smuggling vessels with Washington, after concluding that the legal basis for the US strikes is highly questionable.

Key listening posts and surveillance assets


Key listening posts and surveillance assets© Getty Images
The UK, which has long hosted key listening posts and surveillance assets across its Caribbean territories as part of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, had for years helped the US track suspected narcotics boats so they could be intercepted by the US Coast Guard, their crews detained and their cargo seized.

75 people dead


75 people dead© Getty Images
Now, London fears that continuing to provide targeting information could make it directly complicit in what it increasingly views as potentially unlawful military attacks that have left 75 people dead since the operation began in September.

Pete Hegseth


Pete Hegseth© Getty Images
The news comes as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced on X that two new strikes were carried out in the eastern Pacific Ocean over the weekend, killing six alleged drug smugglers he described as «cartel terrorists».

Two vessels


Two vessels© CaptureSecWar
Hegseth defended the operation by insisting that «These vessels were known by our intelligence to be associated with illicit narcotics smuggling, were carrying narcotics, and were transiting along a known narco-trafficking transit route in the Eastern Pacific.» In his post on X, Hegseth stressed that «two lethal kinetic strikes were conducted on two vessels operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations» and that «Both strikes were conducted in international waters and 3 male narco-terrorists were aboard each vessel. All 6 were killed. No U.S. forces were harmed».

Largest warship


Largest warship© Getty Images
These latest strikes are further fueling unease across Latin America and on the international stage. They come just as the Trump administration’s newest move — the deployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford, the Pentagon’s largest warship, to Latin American waters in what officials say is the biggest US military presence in the region since the 1989 invasion of Panama — raises fears of an even sharper escalation of the conflict in South America.

No longer


No longer© Getty Images/CaptureSecWar
At the same time, the UK is making it increasingly clear it no longer wants to be part of this campaign.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,377
113
Donald Trump urges NBC to 'fire' Seth Meyers in latest Truth Social rant


Donald Trump is back taking swipes at late-night TV hosts on social media - and this time it is Late Night's Seth Meyers in the firing line once again.

Taking to his platform Truth Social, the president made his feelings loud and clear as he diagnosed Meyers with "an incurable case of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS)".



more

But he didn't stop there, as he also urged NBC to fire "no talent" Meyers.

In the full post, Trump wrote, "NBC’s Seth Meyers is suffering from an incurable case of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS). He was viewed last night in an uncontrollable rage, likely due to the fact that his 'show' is a Ratings DISASTER."

He added, "Aside from everything else, Meyers has no talent, and NBC should fire him, IMMEDIATELY!"

Trump's post was also shared on X/Twitter by Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr.




Meyers has been a vocal critic of Trump's. On Thursday's show, he called Trump the "most unpopular president of all time" as a news report played, noting how the president's ratings are in decline among his supporters.

In a recent Fox News interview, Trump remarked that 'You can't take people off the unemployment line and say, 'I'm gonna put you in a factory, go make missiles.'"



more

To which Meyers quipped back that Trump would be unemployed if he didn't have wealthy parents, "Without a million bucks you inherited from your father, you'd be a guy in Queens selling vacuums door to door because you'd keep saying: 'Excuse me, ma'am, are you interested in a vacuum? Much like American workers, they absolutely suck.'"

Trump's previous social media tirade against Meyers
Earlier this month, Trump wrote that Meyers “may be the WORST to perform, live or otherwise,” after the comedian ripped into Trump’s speech to members of the US military.

"I watched his show the other night for the first time in years. In it he talked endlessly about electric catapults on aircraft carriers which I complain about as not being as good as much less expensive steam catapults. On and on he went, a truly deranged lunatic.”

He continued: “Why does NBC waste its time and money on a guy like this??? - NO TALENT, NO RATINGS, 100% ANTI TRUMP, WHICH IS PROBABLY ILLEGAL!!!”


more

In response, Meyers played a compilation video of the president saying “catapults” on repeat.

He also noted Trump had the right to post about him, adding: “That is your First Amendment right, which I have too, right? We all have it, right?”

The host then put the spotlight on Trump’s repeated claims that he doesn’t regularly watch Meyers’s show - even though he tuned into the programme back in January.

“You wrote, ‘I watched his show the other night for the first time in years,’ but just ten months ago you wrote, ‘I got stuck watching Marble Mouth Meyers,’” Meyers said.

Trump vs other talk show hosts


(L-R) Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Kimmel (Photo by Amy Sussman/Getty Images, and Photo by Monica Schipper/Getty Images for Rare Impact Fund)
It's certainly not the first time Trump has gone in on late-night talk show hosts via social media.

Previously, it was announced that The Late Show with Stephen Colbert will end in May 2026 after 33 years on air, Trump took to Truth Social and claimed the reason for the firing of Colbert - a staunch Trump critic - was down to "a pure lack of TALENT" and that "this deficiency was costing CBS $50 Million Dollars a year in losses".


In September, when ABC decided to suspend Jimmy Kimmel Live! “indefinitely” following the comedian’s remarks about late conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Trump expressed his delight at the suspension and said in a Truth Social post that ABC’s decision was “great news for America”.

Then, when ABC later U-turned and decided the show should return to air, Trump shared his dismay at the decision.

“I can’t believe ABC Fake News gave Jimmy Kimmel his job back," he wrote.

“The White House was told by ABC that his Show was cancelled! Something happened between then and now because his audience is GONE, and his ‘talent’ was never there."
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,377
113
Trump choice for top prosecutor 'flunked' entry-level job: report


President Donald Trump's choice to lead federal prosecutions in the Southern District of Florida actually flunked out of an entry-level job in that same office several years ago.

Jason Reding Quiñones was hired as a prosecutor in 2018 and placed on drug and gun cases to gain trial experience, and while most of the office's new hires eventually get promoted to more prestigious divisions, Reding Quiñones was flushed out, sources told the Washington Post.



"Most of those prosecutors win promotion," the Post wrote. "Reding Quiñones flunked, failing to impress his supervisors with his work ethic and legal acumen and earning poor marks on his performance evaluation, according to multiple people familiar with the matter.

"He left the office in 2024," the Post reported. "A year later, President Donald Trump tapped Reding Quiñones, a lieutenant colonel in the Air Force Reserve, to return to the Miami-based U.S. attorney’s office as its boss."



Reding Quiñones’s sudden rise was boosted by conservative lawyer and online activist Mike Davis, who recommended him to the Trump administration to lead investigations into the president's political enemies after the two appeared together on a panel titled “Modern Lawfare and the American Democracy” at a conservative legal conference.



more

“What’s good about Jason is he is not worried about his next job,” Davis told the Post. “He’s going to be there and be a good patriot. He doesn’t care what people think about him. He’s going to follow the law and the constitution.”

The "Lawfare" panelists had talked about special counsel Jack Smith’s investigations of Trump during Joe Biden's presidency, and Reding Quiñones asked what steps should be taken to now that Trump was back in the White House, and Davis proposed a response that's remarkably similar to what his recommended hire is taking as U.S. attorney.

“There must be severe consequences,” Davis told the panel. “We should not take the high ground. … There has to be severe legal, political and financial consequences for this unprecedented republic-ending lawfare.”

Davis proposed charging Trump foes with conspiracy to deprive a person of his civil rights, and Reding Quiñones has become the go-to prosecutor against former Obama administration Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. and CIA Director John Brennan, as well as former FBI officials Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, and the Trump administration is recruiting outside prosecutors to replace those who have fled the office.



more

“I have never seen anything like this before,” said one recently departed assistant U.S. attorney with decades of experience in the office. “People are now asking, ‘If I touch this or that case, will I be fired?’”

The investigation appears to focus on a longtime Trump grievance about a 2017 intelligence assessment that found Russians had taken steps to promote his first campaign for president, and Davis has proposed a work-around for the statute of limitations that would otherwise place the alleged offenses against Trump out of reach for prosecution.

"Davis has floated the idea, however, that prosecutors could try to prove that the assessment was just one part of a long-running conspiracy by government officials to deprive Trump of his rights," the Post reported. "He asserts the conspiracy included the 2022 raid of the president’s Mar-a-Lago resort, which was authorized by a court to retrieve sensitive government materials that Trump took when he left the White House, which would be within the time limit."


The chosen venue for potentially charging those crimes also seems to have been chosen with the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case in mind.

"Davis has also posted court documents on social media showing that a grand jury has been impaneled at Redding Quiñones’s request at the Fort Pierce courthouse — which is part of the Southern District of Florida — and suggested it would be hearing evidence in the conspiracy case," the Post reported.

"By impaneling the grand jury in Fort Pierce, the proceedings, set to begin in January, would likely be overseen by U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon — a conservative favorite who made the controversial ruling to dismiss the federal mishandling of documents indictment against Trump," the report added.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,377
113
Judge scolds Justice Department for 'profound investigative missteps' in Comey case


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department engaged in a “disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps” in the process of securing an indictment against former FBI Director James Comey, a federal judge ruled Monday in directing prosecutors to provide defense lawyers with all grand jury materials from the case.



more

Those problems, wrote Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick, include “fundamental misstatements of the law” by a prosecutor to the grand jury that indicted Comey in September, the use of potentially privileged communications during the investigation and unexplained irregularities in the transcript of the grand jury proceedings.

“The Court recognizes that the relief sought by the defense is rarely granted,” Fitzpatrick wrote “However, the record points to a disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps, missteps that led an FBI agent and a prosecutor to potentially undermine the integrity of the grand jury proceeding.”

The 24-page opinion is the most blistering assessment yet by a judge of the Justice Department's actions leading up to the Comey indictment. It underscores how procedural missteps and prosecutorial inexperience have combined to imperil the prosecution pushed by President Donald Trump for reasons separate and apart from the substance of the disputed allegations against Comey.



more

The Comey case and a separate prosecution of New York Attorney General Letitia James have hastened concerns that the Justice Department is being weaponized in pursuit of Trump's political opponents. Both defendants have filed multiple motions to dismiss the cases against them before trial, arguing that the prosecutions are improperly vindictive and that the prosecutor who filed the charges, Lindsey Halligan, was illegally appointed.

A different judge is set to decide by Thanksgiving on the challenges by Comey and James to Halligan's appointment.

Though grand jury proceedings are presumptively secret, Comey’s lawyers had sought records from the process out of concern that irregularities may have tainted the case. The sole prosecutor who defense lawyers say presented the case to the grand jury was Halligan, a former White House aide with no prior prosecutorial experience who was appointed just days before the indictment to the job of interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.


more

In his order Monday, Fitzpatrick said that after reviewing the grand jury transcript himself, he had come away deeply concerned about the integrity of the case.

“Here, the procedural and substantive irregularities that occurred before the grand jury, and the manner in which evidence presented to the grand jury was collected and used, may rise to the level of government misconduct resulting in prejudice to Mr. Comey,” Fitzpatrick said.

The Justice Department responded to the ruling by asking that it be put on hold to give prosecutors time to file objections. The government said it believed Fitzpatrick “may have misinterpreted” some facts in issuing his ruling.

Fitzpatrick listed, among nearly a dozen irregularities in his ruling, two different comments that a prosecutor — presumably, Halligan — made to the grand jury that he said represented “fundamental misstatements of the law.”


The actual statements are blacked out, but Fitzpatrick said the prosecutor seems to have ignored the fact that a grand jury may not draw a negative inference about a person who exercises his right not to testify in front of it. He said she also appeared to suggest to grand jurors that they did not need to rely only on what was presented to them and could instead before assured that there was additional evidence that would be presented at trial.


FILE - Lindsey Halligan, outside of the White House, Aug. 20, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)

FILE - Lindsey Halligan, outside of the White House, Aug. 20, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)© The Associated Press
The judge also drew attention to the jumbled manner in which the indictment was obtained and indicated that a transcript and recording of the proceedings do not provide a full account of what occurred. Halligan initially sought a three-count indictment of Comey, but after the grand jury rejected one of the three proposed counts and found probable cause to indict on the other two counts, a second two-count indictment was prepared and signed.


But Fitzpatrick said it was not clear to him in reviewing the record that the indictment that Halligan presented in court at the conclusion of the process had been presented to the grand jury for their deliberation.

“Either way, this unusual series of events, still not fully explained by the prosecutor’s declaration, calls into question the presumption of regularity generally associated with grand jury proceedings, and provides another genuine issue the defense may raise to challenge the manner in which the government obtained the indictment,” he wrote.

The two-count indictment charges Comey with lying to Congress in September 2020 when he suggested under questioning that he had not authorized FBI leaks of information to the news media. His lawyers say the question he was responding to was vague and confusing but the answer he gave to the Senate Judiciary Committee was true.


The line of questioning from Sen. Ted Cruz appeared to focus on whether Comey had authorized his former deputy director, Andrew McCabe, to speak with the news media. But since the indictment, prosecutors have made clear that their indictment centers on allegations that Comey permitted a separate person — a close friend and Columbia University law professor, Dan Richman — to serve as an anonymous source in interactions with reporters.

The FBI executed search warrants in 2019 and 2020 to access messages between Richman and Comey as part of a media leaks investigation that did not result in charges. But Fitzpatrick said he was concerned that communications between the men that might have been protected by attorney-client privilege — Richman was at one point functioning as a lawyer for Comey — were exposed to the grand jury without Comey having had an opportunity to object.

Eric Tucker, The Associated Press

 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,377
113


The federal government on Saturday dismissed charges against a Utah plastic surgeon accused of throwing away Covid-19 vaccines, giving children saline shots instead of the vaccine and selling faked vaccination cards.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a post on the social media platform X that charges against Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, of Midvale, Utah, were dismissed at her direction. Moore and other defendants faced up to 35 years in prison after being charged with conspiracy to defraud the government; conspiracy to convert, sell, convey and dispose of government property; and aiding and abetting in those efforts. The charges were brought when Joe Biden was president.

"Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so," Bondi wrote. "He did not deserve the years in prison he was facing. It ends today." Felice John Viti, acting U.S. attorney for Utah, filed the motion Saturday, saying "such dismissal is in the interests of justice."

The trial began Monday in Salt Lake City with jury selection. It was expected to last 15 days. Messages sent to the U.S. Department of Justice, Viti's office in Salt Lake City and to Moore were not immediately returned Saturday. A federal grand jury on Jan. 11, 2023, returned an indictment against Moore, his Plastic Surgery Institute of Utah Inc., others associated with the clinic and a neighbor of Moore's.

The indictment alleged more than $28,000 of government-provided Covid-19 vaccine doses were destroyed. They were also accused of providing fraudulently completed vaccination record cards for over 1,900 doses of the vaccine in exchange for either a cash or a donation to a specified charitable organization. The government also alleged some children were given saline shots, at their parents' request, so the minors believed they were getting the vaccine.

Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr., a leading anti-vaccine activist before becoming the nation's top health official, posted his support for Moore in April, saying on X that Moore "deserves a medal for his courage and his commitment to healing! - Borowitz

1763437818093.png
https://x.com/OccupyDemocrats/status/1990443772677624259/photo/1
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,844
129,377
113
Trump foe excoriates admin in court bid to toss charges


New York Attorney General Letitia James excoriated the conduct of President Donald Trump's lawyers in their attempts to prosecute her for mortgage fraud in a new court filing from Monday.

James was indicted in October on two charges of mortgage fraud, a charge that Trump allies have used to go after other Trump adversaries such as Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. These cases are being charged by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, which is led by Trump's hand-picked interim U.S. Attorney, Lindsey Halligan.




On Monday, James and her lawyers asked the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to dismiss the charges against her with prejudice. They also took the opportunity to call out indiscretions in the prosecution's conduct.

"As explained further below, multiple government actors engaged in outrageous conduct to obtain the indictment, in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment," the motion to dismiss reads in part. "Because this prosecution is patently unconstitutional, this Court should dismiss the indictment with prejudice."


In making their argument, James and her lawyer pointed to Trump's Truth Social post where he called on Attorney General Pam Bondi to indict James and others.




"This indictment is the product of months of illegal and unethical behavior by government officials, only made possible by the misuse of a federal agency, the disregard of exculpatory evidence, the systematic removal of ethics officials and career prosecutors who stood in the way, and the improper attempt to install an unqualified U.S. Attorney with nothing to offer except undying loyalty," the motion adds. "If this brazen, continuous disregard for the law and the Constitution is not outrageous government conduct, nothing is."

Read the entire motion to dismiss by clicking here.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts