Two Israeli soldiers killed by Hezbollah....very fishy stuff.

[exceed]

Yes, you support terrorists if you "agree with the Lebanese Parliament" that the terrorists should be integrated into the state.

That plainly is support for terrorists.

There is only one way to guide Hezbollah back on track: disarm them, the way the IRA was disarmed in Ireland, or Irgun was disarmed in Israel. Once they disarm they can be rehabilitated, the way Begin and Adams were.

Turning Lebanon into a terrorist state is not an acceptable answer, and the Lebanese are not the only ones who have a stake in that.

This is exactly why political debate is not right for you, you don't. show anything that is playable in the field except a simple and retarded answer "disarm them" how?

What the government of Lebanon offered was a chance fpr Hezbollah members to join the military in terms that has to comply within their law and order. In contrast it will only benefits Lebanon and increase the security of sovereignty there is no downfall with this political action.

On the other you are simply asking Lebanon to be thrown back into another civil war. ISIS will consume much of Lebanon's territories when they are weak. you're a supporter of ISIS

 

[fuji]

If you want Hezbollah to be part of the Lebanese state, you support terrorists.

Period.

 

[basketcase]

Why don't you tell us when the court date is?

The trial is currently going on. Yes it would be a lot shorter if Hezbollah didn't refuse Lebanese and UN instructions to make the accused appear.

As I said, try reading the court website.
http://www.stl-tsl.org/en/the-cases

The Hearing from Feb 3 2015 can be found here.
http://www.stl-tsl.org/en/the-cases...n-3-february-2015-in-the-case-of-ayyash-et-al


The UN and the Lebanese courts have accused Hezbollah members. It seems only the insane and hate driven are still trying to blame Israel.

 

[basketcase]

I'm a supporter of terrorists because I agreed with Lebanese Parliament to avoid an unnecessary civil war? ...

That is exactly the issue. Hezbollah continuing to be an armed militia is a violation of Lebanese sovereignty and of UNSC resolutions. Unfortunately Syria and Iran have pumped so much military and financial assistance to Hezbollah that the Lebanese government is unable to easily disarm them.

Their very existence as an army is the problem and Lebanon's government giving in to Hezbollah demands does not change that.

If Hezbollah gave up all of their arms to the legitimate army and Hezbollah members subjected themselves to Lebanese government control, I would find it an acceptable compromise but Hezbollah and their backers in Damascus and Tehran will not allow that. Meanwhile Hezbollah continues to launch attacks from Lebanon.

 

[exceed]

If you want Hezbollah to be part of the Lebanese state, you support terrorists.

Period.

You have gone full retard and refuse any bounds of reasons from anybody that's looking at the interest of peaceful resolutions. It seems to me you are much more terrorist minded than anybody else. You're fucked in the head

 

[exceed]

That is exactly the issue. Hezbollah continuing to be an armed militia is a violation of Lebanese sovereignty and of UNSC resolutions. Unfortunately Syria and Iran have pumped so much military and financial assistance to Hezbollah that the Lebanese government is unable to easily disarm them.

Their very existence as an army is the problem and Lebanon's government giving in to Hezbollah demands does not change that.

If Hezbollah gave up all of their arms to the legitimate army and Hezbollah members subjected themselves to Lebanese government control, I would find it an acceptable compromise but Hezbollah and their backers in Damascus and Tehran will not allow that. Meanwhile Hezbollah continues to launch attacks from Lebanon.

If you pay any attention to what I wrote the third paragraph of your statement is exactly what I have insisted in my 2nd paragraph on post #161. You are only repeating what I said and claimed it yours

 

[exceed]

The trial is currently going on. Yes it would be a lot shorter if Hezbollah didn't refuse Lebanese and UN instructions to make the accused appear.

As I said, try reading the court website.
http://www.stl-tsl.org/en/the-cases

The Hearing from Feb 3 2015 can be found here.
http://www.stl-tsl.org/en/the-cases...n-3-february-2015-in-the-case-of-ayyash-et-al


The UN and the Lebanese courts have accused Hezbollah members. It seems only the insane and hate driven are still trying to blame Israel.

The pre-trial judge reviewed a confidential filing from the prosecutor, detailing why the release of these documents could amongst other things prejudice ongoing or future investigations and potentially put people's lives at risk. The pre-trial judge ordered that the tribunal's prosecutor release more than 270 documents to Jamil El Sayed, who appealed against the decision. The appeals chamber sent the file back to the pre-trial judge for further consideration

They finished at investigating without further evidence the case will likely be postponed until further notice

 

[fuji]

You have gone full retard and refuse any bounds of reasons from anybody that's looking at the interest of peaceful resolutions. It seems to me you are much more terrorist minded than anybody else. You're fucked in the head

Again, Hezbollah are terrorists. You are advocating making terrorism state policy. Clearly.

Throwing this temper tantrum and flinging insults ldoesn't get you off the hook for your support for making Lebanon a terrorist state.

 

[fuji]

The pre-trial judge reviewed a confidential filing from the prosecutor, detailing why the release of these documents could amongst other things prejudice ongoing or future investigations and potentially put people's lives at risk. The pre-trial judge ordered that the tribunal's prosecutor release more than 270 documents to Jamil El Sayed, who appealed against the decision. The appeals chamber sent the file back to the pre-trial judge for further consideration

They finished at investigating without further evidence the case will likely be postponed until further notice

Again, attacking anyone who criticizes your Hezbollah heroes. Passive aggressive support for terrorism.

You hate the West, you hate Israel, you hate the united States, democracy, hate the rule of law. You love terrorists like Hezbollah and you love brutal dictatorships like Iran and Syria.

 

[exceed]

Again, Hezbollah are terrorists. You are advocating making terrorism state policy. Clearly.

Throwing this temper tantrum and flinging insults ldoesn't get you off the hook for your support for making Lebanon a terrorist state.

Again you have not provided anything other than starting a piss fest. nobody insisted making Lebanon a terroris ts state other than your self indulging fantasies. You should really exit retard mode

 

[exceed]

Again, attacking anyone who criticizes your Hezbollah heroes. Passive aggressive support for terrorism.

You hate the West, you hate Israel, you hate the united States, democracy, hate the rule of law. You love terrorists like Hezbollah and you love brutal dictatorships like Iran and Syria.

Again you clearly have no reason to think the things you do. All you wanted was a piss fest not a political debate about the reasonings of the Lebanese government. You don't care for Lebanon, you don't support a peaceful country, you don't want to increase prospects. You only care about war that will collapse Lebanon within itself. You like to see violence that's what feeds off your fantasies. You are very terrorist minded indeed

 

[basketcase]

If you pay any attention to what I wrote the third paragraph of your statement is exactly what I have insisted in my 2nd paragraph on post #161. You are only repeating what I said and claimed it yours

Bullshit. You want Hezbollah to be a part of leading the army. I say that only the Lebanese government should run the army. If Hezbollah wants to hand over their arms, stop threatening another civil war, and subject themselves to Lebanese sovereignty then great.

Of course they refuse to do that as their masters want Lebanon divided if they can't rule it themselves as they did from 1967-2005.

 

[basketcase]

The pre-trial judge reviewed a confidential filing from the prosecutor, detailing why the release of these documents could amongst other things prejudice ongoing or future investigations and potentially put people's lives at risk. The pre-trial judge ordered that the tribunal's prosecutor release more than 270 documents to Jamil El Sayed, who appealed against the decision. The appeals chamber sent the file back to the pre-trial judge for further consideration

They finished at investigating without further evidence the case will likely be postponed until further notice

Have you even read any of the documents? 4 Hezbollah members are accused in the Hariri assassination. Several other are accused in other related bombings. And still Hezbollah uses their threats of violence to prevent justice for Lebanon.

 

[exceed]

Bullshit. You want Hezbollah to be part of the army. I say that only the Lebanese government should run the army. If Hezbollah wants to hand over their arms, stop threatening another civil war, and subject themselves to Lebanese sovereignty then great.

Of course they refuse to do that as their masters want Lebanon divided if they can't rule it themselves as they did from 1967-2005.

Nope that's what exactly I said in paragraph 2 on posts 161. you simply copies what I wrote and make it a version of your own. Y

 

[basketcase]

Nope that's what exactly I said in paragraph 2 on posts 161. you simply copies what I wrote and make it a version of your own. Y

Do you agree that Hezbollah should have absolutely no part in the running of the Lebanese army?

Do you admit that Hezbollah and their masters don't want Hezbollah arms taken over by the army?

 

[exceed]

Have you even read any of the documents? 4 Hezbollah members are accused in the Hariri assassination. Several other are accused in other related bombings. And still Hezbollah uses their threats of violence to prevent justice for Lebanon.

The paragraph on post 167 was taken straight from the source you have provided. Do you not trust your own source anymore?

 

[basketcase]

The paragraph on post 167 was taken straight from the source you have provided. Do you not trust your own source anymore?

Really? Where did you find "They finished at investigating without further evidence the case will likely be postponed until further notice" on the STL site?

 

[exceed]

Do you agree that Hezbollah should have absolutely no part in the running of the Lebanese army?

Do you admit that Hezbollah and their masters don't want Hezbollah arms taken over by the army?

not running but complying with Lebanon's laws and orders to reform itself within limit of the law

2. What are you talking about

 

[exceed]

Really? Where did you find "They finished at investigating without further evidence the case will likely be postponed until further notice" on the STL site?

That last line was my opinion piece summarizes the paragraph

 

[basketcase]

not running but complying with Lebanon's laws and orders to reform itself within limit of the law

2. What are you talking about

The limit of the law says that Hezbollah must disarm. End of story. Lebanon has one sovereign government and one sovereign military. If Hezbollah hands over their (Iranian and Syrian) arms and some Hezbollah soldiers then want to join the Lebanese army then great. Any deal that allows Hezbollah units to continue to function with Hezbollah's leadership violates the rights of Lebanon.

As for 2, Hezbollah has refused to hand over their arms to the Lebanese army. Do you deny that?