Its really entertaining you dig deeper and deeper holes because you won't take the 5 minutes of google time to figure out if there is a legal difference between an association and a union in Canada.
Trump loses 6% in the polls since his fake ear injury
- Thread starter dirtydaveiii
- Start date
We've established that you are acting only on your personal feelings towards rump.
That you don't care that he's been found guilty of fraud, is a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist who has to pay $85 million to one of his victims.
We've also established that you back apartheid and genocide in Palestine.
We've also established that you back corruption in Ontario with your support of Dofo and his greenbelt, ontario place, LCBO and science centre scandals.
Your beliefs are entirely tribal and you accuse anyone who doesn't belong to your MAGA/incel tribe of 'hypocrisy'.
Now you say 'no one cares' as if its universal and not just your extremist tribal views.
Last time I posted something without a source and you attacked me for that I told you to google it yourself. You refused and just kept badgering me about not providing a source.
So?
No one cares about things someone did or didn't do before they took office. They care about what someone does while in office.
The only ones who go back to 1998 (or was it 1999?) are people looking to make money or attack political opponents.
Common people see through all this bs and don't get fooled. Proof of which is the millions and millions of supporters.
You haven't established anything other than your own stupidity.
You back terrorists.
You are racist.
You back homophobes.
You are a Marxist.
My beliefs are from the tribe called "Democracy & Freedom"...whereas yours are purely Communist in nature. You're not fooling anyone comrade.
Your tribe is MAGA and its Canadian PeePee branch.
There is no freedom or democracy in that movement, its all corruption and tribal claims of racial supremacy in order to keep billionaires in power by conning meek supporters like yourself.
You're just sheep.
No it hasn't.
You've insisted they can't call him a rapist because he wasn't found liable for rape under New York State Law.
You've twisted yourself in knots about what the "real definition of rape" is and how the judge's opinions and legal decisions don't count.
If you had stuck to "no, you can't say he was convicted of rape" then that would have been fine.
If you had stuck to "I don't believe he is a rapist" that would have been fine. (Although that would just be an opinion and people would argue.)
Instead you kept trying to claim that not being convicted or found liable of a specific rape charge means he isn't a rapist and no one can say he is.
And that's just a ludicrous assertion by any measure.
Like here.
That's just a nonsensical statement.
Last edited:
Nonsensical?
Show me where he was convicted of rape.
Keep in mind this all was run within civil court not criminal court. There's a reason why the two types of court exist.
He's way more guilty than Bill Cosby Harvey weinstein and Ron jermey put together
Last edited:
You must play the lotto (sucker's bet/donation to the government without tax break)
Wait.
You seriously are arguing "no one can be called a rapist if they haven't been convicted of rape"?
Yes, that's nonsensical.
How do you navigate the real world with such a distorted view of reality?
Yes, there are two kinds of court and for good reason.
What does that have to do with this discussion?
You aren't so confused as to think only rulings in criminal court are "real"?
Those three were being tried in criminal court.
You still haven't learned the difference between criminal & civil court? Pity.
So you go around calling people murderers if they were never convicted of murder? Just your gut feel?
The type of court and results have everything to do with this.
Ahahahahaha gut feel my ass
Hitler has never been convicted of murder. Neither was Pol Pot.
No one had called OJ a murderer.
Say it, say it loud and say it proud:
"OJ was not a murderer."
Depends on how you view criminal court.
Was he convicted of murder?
Or are we just going to use the court of public opinion as the basis of our justice system comrade?
Pick one Karl.
