Openness to learning is a good thing but simply parroting lies is not learning. It is the opposite of learning and your hero counts on his followers like you just accepting his lies while he is fleecing them .
Trump cant post bond
- Thread starter dirtydaveiii
- Start date
I'm basically parroting what lawyers on the right think. A lot of lawyers on the right, think that Engoron and James are in the wrong. I basically agree with these lawyers on the right.
you are of course entitled to your opinion and a lot of people share your view. That is different than just accepting the lies they hope people will simply accept and repeat. They exploit you for their own personal gain. The money he raided from the PACs and the RNC were not contributed to pay the legal fees of someone who claims to be a billionaire.
But almost every lawyer who has worked for rump is now either bankrupt or facing their own charges, their careers totally destroyed.
You think all those lawyers were right as well?
Sydney Powell
Alina Habba
Rudy G
Michael Cohen
Peter Ticktin
Jamie Alan Sasson
Jenna Ellis
Lin Wood
There's another dozen more as well.
Would you parrot what they think too?
Trump had no choice. The dems are coming after Trump with total lawfare. Engoron is a crooked judge and James is a crooked DA!!
Who cares!! Lawyers love working for Trump because it helps them get other clients. It's also a honor to do legal work for a president of the US!!
But those are the people whose views you keep parroting.
Is this you admitting that your views are based on echoing bad legal advice from shoddy lawyers?
All these Dem charges were BS. If it wasn't Trump, none of these joke charges would have been filed against anyone else!!
These fines were totally wrong. Both the Carroll case and the James case shouldn't have been filed in the first place!!
Why shouldn’t they have been filed? Rape and fraud are against the law, Mitch.
But you get all your legal opinions from really bad lawyers like Rudi and Sydney Powell.
Again just quoting the stable genius talking points which are clearly not true. Just look at the facts. Do you think if they are tru (and in many cases they have not yet been proved) don’t you think they would be criminal. Do you think law does not apply to him?
