Top 10 Reasons Gay Marriage is Wrong

acutus

Active member
Dec 14, 2005
1,866
0
36
Just North of the GTA
Lol...

eyeofthedragon said:
Why do you think it is cheap? We could be friends. I admit that I intensley dislike your views and at first was angered by them, but you are entitled to your own opinions and I have to respect that. Doesn't the rainbow make you happy though?
In my World one can and should always 'attack' another individual's point of view...but one does this without ever attacking that individual personally. A trivial point for some here on this site, I'm certain. Sincerey, Jon .
 

acutus

Active member
Dec 14, 2005
1,866
0
36
Just North of the GTA
Lol...

Morgan Ellis said:
It makes me happy. Now, let's all have some non-procreatory, sexually degenerate, adulterous intercourse to celebrate. We could even throw in some sodomy, just to mark the week appropriately. Acutus, in the meantime, can pray for all of us non repentent sinners. Me, I can think of better things to be doing while on my knees...

Cheers!

Morgan
Better that then having to defend the sources that you've cited. Sincerely, Jon .
 

xdog

New member
Feb 28, 2006
1,444
0
0
toronto
Wasn't there an article in Time magazine that the first confirmed case of HIV originated with a male flight attendant who made flights to Africa and Haiti? Do the people who support gay marriage also support polygamy? Although I don't entirely agree with Acutus, he has made a few valid points.


x
 

acutus

Active member
Dec 14, 2005
1,866
0
36
Just North of the GTA
Lol...

Morgan Ellis said:
Sugarpop, I never have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent. Now, run along and go sing a hymn or something, and leave the grownup perverts to exchange sexually charged bon mots.

Homoerotic kisses,

Morgan
A mature response indicative of your communication skills. Sincerely, Jon .
 

acutus

Active member
Dec 14, 2005
1,866
0
36
Just North of the GTA
funsmartguy said:
Jon, as you have not defended the sources you have quoted, nor have you offered any great insight into your stand, other than to reiterate tired arguments that lack substance, I would respectfully suggest you focus on the issue at hand. Several interesting (IMHO) points have been raised in this discussion, such as lesbian relations do not have the same risks you claim for homosexuals, marriage does not mean sex (I really understand that, I do), along with your refusal to recognize the validity of other opinions.

Are you homophobic? Are you concerned that males married to other males will cause you to become ill?

As a last point, please remember that sex for any other purpose than reproduction is wasteful. Do you only engage in sex to reproduce?

FSG
Thank you for your reply Mr. Funsmartguy. Please show me where my 'tired arguments' lack substance. I am no more 'Homophobic' then I am 'Paedophobic'. I do not share your point of view that sex for any other purpose than reproduction, is wasteful. Please review my previous posts as required. Sincerely, Jon .
 

DATYdude

Puttin' in Face Time
Oct 8, 2003
3,761
0
36
Jon, your posts just leave me dumbfounded. How much more plainly can I put my responses to your arguments?

OK let me try:

Here we go:

Are you ready?

Jon:


Being gay is NOT by itself harmful, to individuals or society.
It's NOT like second hand smoke, drunken driving, or pedophelia.

OK that's my main point, distilled down to 21 words.
 

DATYdude

Puttin' in Face Time
Oct 8, 2003
3,761
0
36
OK, xdog, yes I support polygamy when among consenting adults. Why is polygamy harmful? (Oh man I can see the jokes coming from a mile away...) If my wife and I had a stay at home wife our kids would be raised better, I'd (maybe) get more nookie at home and probably more home-cooked meals too. Is there a downside? No doubt that tax rules would be challenging. I think our culture could accomodate polygamy quite easily.

But I digress... Happy weekend all !
 

Morgan Ellis

Bitchy McBitcherson
Whenever I read posts on Terb about how icky some men find homosexuality to be, I always wonder if they feel the same way about boy on girl anal sex.. after all, in the long run is there really that much difference between which butt you're sticking your penis in?

And don't even get me started on the whole 'male homosexuality bad; lesbians good' thing...Oy.

Morgan
 

Morgan Ellis

Bitchy McBitcherson
Just admit it, strap ons are farkin' hot!

Cripes, this is 2006.. and we're on an escort board, for God's sake! Of all the places you'd expect to see more tolerance for sexuality that deviates from the so-called 'norm', you'd assume this would be the place.

Face it, none of us on here are doing what most of society would consider to be 'acceptable', or 'decent', and the last time I checked, this house was made out of some pretty thin glass... so perhaps we should all refrain from chucking around such big rocks.

Barring that, there are some nice Christian right wing discussion boards out there that would revel in a good old fashioned whore bashing, gay slamming, adultery condemning discussion thread.

Dammit, doesn't anyone just want to talk about blow jobs anymore?

- M
 

Morgan Ellis

Bitchy McBitcherson
eyeofthedragon said:
I have to admit that gagging is not hot - it can be degrading and who wants to be puked on (not that there is anything wrong with that)
I agree with you... plus, hit me the right way, and I have zero gag reflex, so I'm gag noise deprived. Also, Baby Jesus told me that swallowing is immoral, because of all the unborn babies it wastes.

Of course, since blow jobs don't contribute to procreation, I think we should all just say 'no' to them.

Yeah, I can see that idea going over like a lead balloon...
 

bobistheowl

New member
Jul 12, 2003
4,403
3
0
Toronto
acutus said:
Interesting perhaps, Mr. Bobistheow; however Mr. Hopper is a non-scientist with a 'hypothesis', only. Sincerely, Jon .
I think Preston Marx' theory about "serial passage" through dirty needles is a better one than Hopper's. Unlike Hopper, Marx is an MD, virologist specifically.

The Butare vaccines made in the 1950's may not have been up to Red Cross standards in terms of sterile conditions, as well.

Monkey kidneys were used to cultivate the vaccines because they had a low natural immunity to foreign agents, so introduced polio virus could replicate in live tissue without being killed off by the kidney's antibodies.

I can't believe that a pandemic could be caused just by occaisional monkey bites, or monkey blood getting into cuts during butchering, but the serial passage theory makes a lot more sense:

Deadly Needles

London, 2000

In the middle of the furor, Marx and Drucker quietly waited their turn.

Finally, near the end of the conference, Marx took the podium and presented their theory to the assembled researchers.

He told the conference he and Drucker believed the mass injection campaigns in Africa during the 1950s not only helped spread the AIDS virus but the widespread reuse of contaminated needles actually caused the harmless simian viruses - which usually caused weak, dead-end infections in humans - to become deadly and transmissable.

The lethal transformation occurred through a process called "serial passage, " Marx said.

That process occurs when patient A - infected with a simian virus through a splash of monkey blood in an open cut - receives an injection. When the same needle, carrying patient A's contaminated blood, is reused, the virus is transmitted to patient B.

That sequence is then repeated when the virus from patient B is transmitted to patient C by another unsterile needle, and so on.

In each patient, Marx explained, the virus rapidly adapts to its host's immune system through mutations, growing stronger before it is passed to the next patient. Through that process, the virus grows increasingly virulent until it is not only lethal but can be easily transmitted through sexual activity. The SIV has been transformed into HIV.

The process had already been witnessed in monkey experiments, Marx told his colleagues. Simian viruses became 1,000 times more pathogenic as they were "serially passaged" through as few as three monkeys.

Marx acknowledged that the serial passage of a virus in humans would be a very rare occurrence. But the huge influx of needles in Africa, particularly in the 1950s, exponentially increased the opportunity for serial passage to occur, he said.

And if the those injection campaigns had caused the virus to turn deadly, the responsibility for the AIDS epidemic rests not with a contaminated vaccine but with a different intervention of modern medicine - the introduction of the hypodermic needle.

"The consequences of massive unsterile injecting appears to be another case of unintended consequences of technological innovation," Marx said.

And he warned that if needles continue to be reused in Africa and elsewhere, new strains of viruses may cross the species barrier to humans and ignite new epidemics.
 

acutus

Active member
Dec 14, 2005
1,866
0
36
Just North of the GTA
Lol...

funsmartguy said:
Jon, your tired argument - "the true biological purpose of sex is to produce Life" - if that really is your premise, everything you have said after that is meaningless. You then note you do not share my view that sex for any other purpose than reproduction is wasteful. That contradicts your first statement. "Tired" was a pleasant way of describing poorly prepared, lacking substance, bigoted, and foolish.

ps. wasteful does not preclude fun, exciting or stimulating. Perhaps you should try some.
pss. please review your previous posts and maintain a consistent, logical, rational position.

FSG
'Poorly prepared'?; 'lacking substance'?; 'bigoted'?; and 'foolish'?...'Please review your previous posts and maintain a consistent, logical, rational postion'? Is this a serious reply? Aside from using some of my words('...please review your previous posts...')in your response to me; Please explain what the True purpose of sex is, as you understand it to be, Mr. Funsmartguy, if not to create Life? Sincerely, Jon .
 

acutus

Active member
Dec 14, 2005
1,866
0
36
Just North of the GTA
bobistheowl said:
Marx acknowledged that the serial passage of a virus in humans would be a very rare occurrence.
Thank you for your reply Mr. Bobistheowl. I have to wonder about the value of attempting to offer various 'theories' about the cause of AIDS when the cause of AIDS is known absolutely, and that is by Homosexual anal intercourse. What 'theory' is going to be presented next?...How about a secret U.S. Military secret weapon gone wrong? The AIDS virus was secretly 'designed' to kill all the people on the planet for some yet unexplained secret reason? Sincerely, Jon .
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts