So you admit she is an attention whore then.They've got nothing on Elon and rump.
No true.Except what she actually says isn't quite the consensus of the scientists. It's an utterly worst case scenario and beyond presented as most likely.
Feel free to compare her statements with the IPCC reports and highlight the errors.So you are saying you have taken all her claims and checked it vs what that document on the whole says?
Wow another lie.
You call her an attention whore because you disagree with science and don't care if climate change destroys your kids futures.So you admit she is an attention whore then.
X
Well Y>X
So I notice you didn't actually say not X
You do this pretty much non stop. It's kinda amusing.
I punched a woman in the face for kicks
Well Paul Bernardo did worse
THis is NOT a fucking defense. It's an admission of guilt.
I haveFeel free to compare her statements with the IPCC reports and highlight the errors.
Point to the post where I called her an attention whore.You call her an attention whore because you disagree with science and don't care if climate change destroys your kids futures.
That's your opinion.
I'd say good for her, she saw something that is fucked up about the world and tried to fix it.
Last time I checked, that's not my name, neither is Stacy, Jane, Mary Jo or Lisa, that's not my name.I think the attention whore of the century is a tie between her and Turdy.
Then I pointed out that by not refuting his claim, but just pointing out there are greater attention whores it is YOU you must obviously think she is to some degree an attention whoreThey've got nothing on Elon and rump.
Fuck man, it must be hard to go through life unable to read properly or understand logic and yet you go on and slag on people.So you admit she is an attention whore then.
X
Well Y>X
So I notice you didn't actually say not X
You do this pretty much non stop. It's kinda amusing.
I punched a woman in the face for kicks
Well Paul Bernardo did worse
THis is NOT a fucking defense. It's an admission of guilt.
You mean this?Point to the post where I called her an attention whore.
Go ahead, because I NEVER DID. Again is it that you don't understand what you read, or is this just another one of your lies
Last time I checked, that's not my name, neither is Stacy, Jane, Mary Jo or Lisa, that's not my name.
Then you said
Then I pointed out that by not refuting his claim, but just pointing out there are greater attention whores it is YOU you must obviously think she is to some degree an attention whore
Fuck man, it must be hard to go through life unable to read properly or understand logic and yet you go on and slag on people.
So again I ask, where did
1: I call her an attention whore
2: Make any statement on climate change, it's seriousness or the desirability to do something about it.
I didn't because it NEVER FUCKING HAPPENED.
Yeah exactly. Just more lies and bullshit from terbs top hate monger.
Now the question is, will you for once in your life admit you are wrong and retract your statement, just ignore it and go on with your bullshit or double down on your wrongness
I vote the third, but as I don't see your lies and bullshit unless I click the view ignored content tab, I'll probably never know.
Why are right wingers so triggered by Greta?So you admit she is an attention whore then.
Every time I read one of these posts I think this.Two observations pertinent to your poem.
i) Greta looks more happy than sad whenever and wherever
there are news reporters recording her latest crusade.
ii) Greta's boobs have grown to adult-size. They are not
too bad as assets for someone devoid of real world skills
to flaunt to whore for attention of dirty old things like me.
