You mean the 62 UN resolutions Israel refuses to obey?UNGA and UNSC response to Israel
Yes, Israel is a pariah state and should be banned from the UN.
You mean the 62 UN resolutions Israel refuses to obey?UNGA and UNSC response to Israel
No, Shazi.How many more are you willing to sacrifice geno. Compared to now, there were only 20,000 dead at the beginning of the year. This is what you've called for.
Just show us the ones that say Israel is committing genocide or apartheid.You mean the 62 UN resolutions Israel refuses to obey?
That's just great Geno. 20,000 were dead at the beginning of the year and now you claim that 360,000 are dead. Awesome strategy.....only if you want to max out the number of dead Gazans.No, Shazi.
I've called for ceasefire all year,
Its summer of 1945 for nazis.Just show us the ones that say Israel is committing genocide or apartheid.
Oh, wait! You mean to say that out of 62 there is not a single one to back up your lies of Israeli genocide, Geno? You almost had me convinced until you came up with just your limp dick between your thumb and forefinger................once again. You are impotent.
You have no quotes to back up your claims.Its summer of 1945 for nazis.
Enjoy your feeling of victory while you can.
Ah, the wife beater's strategy.That's just great Geno. 20,000 were dead at the beginning of the year and now you claim that 360,000 are dead. Awesome strategy.....only if you want to max out the number of dead Gazans.
I've told you all along this would happen if Hamas did not surrender then. Are you proud of supporting a strategy that has resulted in so many unnecessary deaths? "Well, are you punk?" (Did you get the reference Geno? I don't think you ever leave your keyboard.)
Sick strategy when you promote incestuous genocide.
How long do you think Israel can continue the genocide, Shazi?You have no quotes to back up your claims.
I will enjoy.
When should I expect a proper response Genostradamus. On what exact date should I start trembling?
Still no quotes from the Lancet or the authors to back up your claim. That means they are racist lies and you are impotent.How long do you think Israel can continue the genocide, Shazi?
What do you think Israel's endgame is?
Is it a final solution?
Or pushing Palestinians into the sea?
Still a holocaust denier?Still no quotes from the Lancet or the authors to back up your claim. That means they are racist lies and you are impotent.
Ah poor baby doesn't like having his idiocy pointed out.STFU.
If Harris loses blame her and her support of genocide.
Don't blame voters.
She can change her policy if she wants the people to vote for her.
Easy.
(Gritty is also Jewish)
Again, try even taking a basic course on genetics and evolution.What part did you not understand? Skin color is, in part, genetic. And human populations change skin color over time by interbreeding with other human populations.
Neither has said it's a genocide.Tell that to the ICC and ICJ.
...
Yet you still wondered why Europeans in South Africa and Africans in the US haven't seen their skin colour change.I have. Have you? Then you would understand population biology and gene flow.
You are pushing for a rump presidency, you back AIPAC and Netanyahu's campaign to have rump win.Ah poor baby doesn't like having his idiocy pointed out.
You are blatantly using Jews as puppets for your views despite having posted about American jews being disloyal.
You are also actively promoting a trump presidency out of spite despite the fact he has promised to get Israel to 'finish Hamas' quickly. Shows you put your inflated ego and self-important hatreds ahead of the welfare of Palestinians.
Wow. The moronic claims from the guy who is actively pushing for Democrat voters to reject Harris. You are living in a completely disjointed reality. Next thing I expect to see you post about is sharks, windmills, Hannibal Lecter and your crowd sizes.You are pushing for a rump presidency, ...
Don't recall Frank saying changes in skin colour is expected in a couple hundred years. Can you point to the post where he said that?I was making a point. I was pointing out that they haven't changed over several generations, contrary to Franks assertion.
Is this what you do? Twist the intent of what someone said. Figures.