The photography thread

[|2 /-\ | /|/]

Picked up my 16-35 2.8 - got a great deal on a used one at Henry's. Managed to use it a little yesterday and very happy with it. Extremely sharp! And seems to have very good color reproduction. Hope to use it more in the coming days.

Pics or it did not happen

j/k...how much did you blow on it?

 

[pussyluver]

Pics or it did not happen

j/k...how much did you blow on it?

Talked them down to $800. It's the first version of the lens, not the current version 2. But for a$700 savings I couldn't justify getting the brand new one.

 

[ZenSouljah]

Nothing wrong with a used lens as long as it's in good condition

This guy at the ROM

 

[glamphotographer]

Picked up my 16-35 2.8 - got a great deal on a used one at Henry's. Managed to use it a little yesterday and very happy with it. Extremely sharp! And seems to have very good color reproduction. Hope to use it more in the coming days.

Used lens? Sometimes used lenses have focusing issues. Here's how to test it for any autofocus issues.

https://photographylife.com/how-to-quickly-test-your-dslr-for-autofocus-issues

 

[justfor]

I've watched that video 5 times now and it looks so real. How did they do it?

Ditto -- I'd like to know too! I saw it ( the "Walk of Shame" ) again recently and I still couldn't tell it's not real.

 

[SkyRider]

Ditto -- I'd like to know too! I saw it ( the "Walk of Shame" ) again recently and I still couldn't tell it's not real.

The only way I knew was because they interviewed the "body double". Maybe how they did it is a trade secret? Just goes to show what you see is not what you get.

 

[Master Baiter]

Shame.... shame... shame.... shame that nobody posted a pic.

http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2015...cerseis-nude-walk-of-shame-in-game-of-thrones

 

[black booty lover]

I can't even seem to post pics. I read the instructions, but when I post, just a tiny black box with x through it shows up.

 

[SkyRider]

I have two photos of Maria Sharapova (what a cutie).

One is a print photo that looks unaltered. The other is an Intenet version of the same photo.

In the print photo you could clearly see her puss through the sheer white panties. Did the photographer use a super powerful flash that can "shoot through fabric":Eek:?

In the Internet version, they removed the panties altogether.