I guess it could be but it sounds odd when I say it. I would say spoonfuls or forkfuls. Probably why, for the life of me, I couldn't come up with the answer. lol
The new trivia thread.
- Thread starter Ceiling Cat
- Start date
I guess it could be but it sounds odd when I say it. I would say spoonfuls or forkfuls. Probably why, for the life of me, I couldn't come up with the answer. lol
Are you sure that's a word? I would say spoonfuls for the plural. I don't have access to my dictionary at the moment but it doesn't come up on dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spoonsful
Try googling "spoonsful or spoonfuls".
Spoonsful is "correct" but sounds clumsy, and has been replaced by spoonfuls in everyday speech and usage. But spoonsful is there, in the heavy dictionaries. You didn't want it to be easy, did you?
Seriously, who has a better on screen voice than James Earl Jones?, afterall he is the voice of CNN.
The sound of a ducks quack is quite distinctive. there may be a anomalies in how the sound is produced. It may that the quack is produced at such a frequency that the echo does not return in the same manner as other sounds. It may be a phenomena that the echo registers on electronic equipment but not easily heard by human ears. I am not arguing that the quack echoes or it does not. Just saying.
Why was there never a channel 1 on the old TV dials?
Answer :
The old televisions of the 1950s to 1970s had no channel 1 because that frequency band was reserved for taxi communications equipment.
On Giligans's Island, what was Giligans's first name?
It was never ascertained whether it was his first name or last name, he was simply known as "Gilligan".
This guy missed out on a popular 1960s television series, which show was that?
Laugh-In?
Similar threads
