The election litigation thread
- Thread starter Dutch Oven
- Start date
I think we can answer your question with you answering this...was there credible evidence that should overturn the election?
Well Dutch will go to the very end, even though this is a done deal with Biden being nominated. He follows in the foot steps of Bud Plug's defence of James Fields innocence!!
But when is Powell going to produce the evidence that implicates the FBI and CIA as she outrageously claimed she had?? This woman has zero credibility similar to Giuliani's joke of a witness that was high on something!!
That isn't even close to an answer to my question.
And, again, "we" answers a question directed to one handle. Interesting.
Ah Beaver, for you nothing is true until someone else says it's true, provided that person is someone who someone else told you to believe, etc.
Nothing passive aggressive at all about my observation. I've explicitly stated that either several handles here are really the same user, or I'm witnessing an extraordinary display of groupthink/hivemind. That's why users constantly answer posts that weren't directed to to them, and purport to be answering for more than themselves (thus, the ubiquitous "we"). Reminds me of the movie "Split".
...you did avoid answering my question but that’s ok, I was expecting one of your round and round answers with no conclusion.
You know something else. All the dozens of judges who rejected Trump's 60-odd attempts to overturn the election are all the same judge wearing a variety of very lifelike masks.
Or maybe they ARE different judges, but their minds are all controlled by George Soros. Or Hugo Chavez. Groupthink / hivemind is the answer. Otherwise what are the chances that ALL of those judges would have decided against Trump. One in a quadrillion, right?!
Whereas a true and free thinker would think for themselves and accept wholeheartedly theories of fact and law that appear rational to them.
Too bad I need evidence and proof, not just conspiracy theories of facts that only barely appear rational, S.
OIC Dutch, to you everything from Powell's mouth is Gospel Truth even without any factual evidence. So far all her random allegations have been debunked and nothing so far to implicate the CIA or FBI, unless you have it. Go ahead and post it!!
0 for 60.
I've been right, as has everyone else in this thread, and we've been backed up by the courts 60 times.
Even the Trump appointed judges think his arguments are bullshit.
The only one fooled here is you, S.
1. You are funny. When did I say that everything Powell states is correct? I merely posted her interview, and saying it was interesting was enough to set you and the other members of your Borg Unimatrix into a tizzy.
2. "Debunked" was a word that used to have meaning. No longer. It's overused, mostly improperly. You can throw it into the same bin as the word "harassment". The vast majority of suits have only proceeded on emergency pre-trial motions and have been dismissed due to: a) lack of standing, b) insufficient evidence to support the signficant relief sought without a trial. This is not the same as a rejection on the merits of all the claims that have been advanced.
3. Let me understand you - I'm to post evidence of CIA support of the Dominion platform (Powell's claim)? Do you think the CIA shares its deepest secrets with me? LOL! Who cares about that aspect of her claim anyway? I don't. If the Dominion machines and software were manipulated I wouldn't care if that was done by the CIA, Hugo Chavez, Putin, the DNC, or Aunt Jemima. Isn't the real issue whether anyone is going to bother to audit the voting machines and software and/or whether the machines and data have been properly preserved for such an audit? Do you find it to be an outrageous claim that the Smartmatic system could be manipulated? Seems that small scale auditing has produced meaningful discrepancies (Powell talks about this claim). Texas (and Canada) didn't think that was an outrageous proposition.
4. OIC = Oh, I see. Quite a timesaver! LOL!
In a nutshell what was this statement of yours supposed to be??
If this was not in reference to Powell, who on earth were you referring to, unless it was James Fields' "Innocence"!! Powell has no credibility, so it is laughable that you bring up something ridiculous like that interview. Otherwise, why did even Trump's own team want to distance themselves from her based on her allegations about the FBI / CIA complicity in this so called "voter fraud"?
When the FBI comes out to state that the elections were the most "Secure" that it has ever been, then maybe Trump and his cronies must have been pissed off that Putin could not manipulate it like they probably did in the past elections. LOL!!
But for you to state that you learnt something new about "OIC", especially on this Board, well maybe, we have to explain to you about BBBJ, DT, HJ, BS, ROFLMAO, MIA, and the list goes on and on, if they are not meant to be "time savers". LOL!!
Similar threads
