www.cisa.gov
The irony of the people who prevented fixing the security of the voting machines, software, and databases challenging it now is off the charts.
The CISA statement is worth virtually nothing, because CISA doesn't claim to have audited the 2020 election held in any state, and because the statement doesn't respond to the specific security concerns outlined in the statement by counsel.Joint Statement from Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees | CISA
The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State...
I've yet to see a lawsuit determined on the basis of irony. Besides, the Trump campaign is the litigant, and they had no say in the election hardware and software used in any state election.
You are quite right. Wasn't the point of my statement.
No idea if that's true, since kicking back to make sure software owned by people who support Republicans is certainly possible.
She won't be enough.
No not irony but anybody can file a lawsuit for any reason... sharpiegate was fun.
No, you're confusing the statements of the host and her guest. The host thought the issue was software glitches, as had occured in Michigan and Georgia. The guest made it clear that it went way beyond that. She stated that criminal investigations were warranted. She spoke about the ability to purposely switch votes, either manually or by algorithm, not about human error or software processing malfunction.
www.breitbart.com
I watched it...she is relying on a lot of whistleblowers and her story rests with them...she has to hope all her sources are 100% correct and honest...good luck.
www.usatoday.com
I'll tell you what is "false". It's fact checkers using the word "false" when what they mean is "unproven" (these words aren't even close to identical in meaning), when they've taken no steps themselves to look for any direct evidence to positively disprove a claim, and when they deliver this verdict before anyone making the claim has had the opportunity to present their evidence in court. The USA today story relies on the CISA report, which was issued BEFORE any specific security issues were even identified by the Trump Campaign.I watched it...she is relying on a lot of whistleblowers and her story rests with them...she has to hope all her sources are 100% correct and honest...good luck.
Fact check: Dominion voting machines didn't delete votes from Trump, switch them to Biden
Some news sources claimed vote counting software from Dominion Voting Systems deleted votes for Trump or switched votes to Biden. That's false.
Your ridiculous point is simply a variety of the Gish Gallop. Put out a never ending swarm of highly improbable assertions and insist that the are not false, but so far only unproven.
I make no bets on what evidence Powell will produce, or whether the courts will think it's serious enough to amend, or rerun an election, although I do note that her reputation is that she's not a bullshitter.
I should just let your post stand as res ipsa loquitur, but to save anyone looking up that term or Gish Gallop, if you can't appreciate the difference between the terms "false" and "unproven", I leave you to the ravages of our beloved press.
She is aligning herself with a bullshitter, Rudy G...and her evidence may be manufactured by bullshitters.
