love the quote: “I may need to take back what I said about Rep. Kelly’s PA suit being the dumbest case I’ve ever seen filed on an emergency basis at the Supreme Court,” Rick Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine, wrote on the Election Law Blog. “This new one from the indicted Texas AG Ken Paxton … probably should win that prize.”
The election litigation thread
- Thread starter Dutch Oven
- Start date
The fake news media is having a laughfest reading Rudy and his infected team's handiwork.
Almost as enjoyable as winning yet another S from our resident legal expert.
Why this Texas 'election fraud' lawsuit is a total and complete joke
Dutch oven's work is urgently needed in the US, someone has to explain the theory of law and fact.
Nice, I think that makes it a '4 S day', which about equals the losses of yours and Trump's arguments in court.
Keep it up, you're on a roll.
Maybe you should stick to watching the dog chasing his tail.
South Dakota files an amicus brief in support of the Brnovich (Arizona) case before SCOTUS:
news.sd.gov
Here's the amicus brief:
SD.gov
news.sd.gov
Here's the amicus brief:
Deeper, dutchie, you can dig deeper still!South Dakota files an amicus brief in support of the Brnovich (Arizona) case before SCOTUS:
SD.gov
Here's the amicus brief:
C'mon, this is the big one, the one you and Trump have been waiting for, the one that validated your ever so excellent theory of fact and law that appears rational to you.
But whatever you do, don't read Pennsylvania's response to Texas, you won't like it.
The cascading series of compounding defects in Texas’s filings is only underscored by the surreal alternate reality that those filings attempt to construct. That alternate reality includes an absurd statistical analysis positing that the probability of President-Elect Biden winning the election was “one in a quadrillion.”
Imagine that, only one in a quadrillion chances that Biden won the election.
You've got some serious stats people on your team.
Apparently some people are taking this Texas lawsuit seriously.
But that's matched by this.
lawandcrime.com
All for a case that the supreme court will never hear.
But that's matched by this.
Democratic Attorneys General Argue That Texas' Supreme Court Lawsuit Asks the Justices to ‘Reorder the Constitution’
Twenty states, two U.S. territories, and Washington, D.C. implored the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday to reject a long-shot lawsuit filed by the state of Texas which asked the justices to throw out the election results in four states where President Donald Trump lost to Joe Biden.
All for a case that the supreme court will never hear.
Trump will see him on TV fighting for Trump.
That's all he needs from the case to maybe get a pardon.
Still not sure why you think this is relevant?
Did I miss a reference to it in the Texas case?
They shouldn't...Apparently some people are taking this Texas lawsuit seriously.
But that's matched by this.
Democratic Attorneys General Argue That Texas' Supreme Court Lawsuit Asks the Justices to ‘Reorder the Constitution’
Twenty states, two U.S. territories, and Washington, D.C. implored the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday to reject a long-shot lawsuit filed by the state of Texas which asked the justices to throw out the election results in four states where President Donald Trump lost to Joe Biden.
All for a case that the supreme court will never hear.
Trump's 'Big' Texas Supreme Court Lawsuit Is Just as Fake as All the Others
Don’t be fooled because the case was filed in the Supreme Court. It’s going nowhere — and Trump is still on his way out of the White House.
www.rollingstone.com
FBI Subpoenas Texas AG Ken Paxton After Alleged Bribery Reports
Sources confirmed Thursday the FBI has subpoenaed Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton after his senior staff revolted and reported him for alleged corruption, bribery and abuse of office for investigating the enemies of campaign donor and Austin real estate investor Nate Paul.
www.courthousenews.com
