Her words are in direct response to the Academic foundation of closing schools, and even with that she is using words "could", "perhaps", and "with infection control measures" it certainly is not a definite the same would be achieved from not locking down schools, which is in complete opposition of your article.
What the sensationalized article claims she said and what you repeated here numerous times are simply false and misleading.
Here are her exact words.
In an interview with NRK, she says this about the academic basis for closing schools and kindergartens, among other things.
"It does not mean that we do not stand by the advice we gave then, given the knowledge base we had at the time. Our assessment now, and I find that there is a broad consensus in connection with the reopening, was that one could achieve perhaps the same effect and avoid some of the unfortunate effects of the ring by not closing, but by keeping open with infection control measures."
It absolutely does not make a difference if people agree with me or not because certain words out of her statement were purposely selected and leaving out the important parts to fit the narrative that the article you linked was trying to spin which makes the article you posted again false.
As for me I do not put narratives out, I repeat facts and data from reliable sources, if people disagree with facts and data it shows their lack of knowledge on the subject.
