I obviously don't have all the data points but I would hazard a guess the ratio of men/women on these sugaring websites is a little bit more balanced than say Tinder where the number of men simply outweigh the number of women.Looking at this discussion though, even seeking is kinda the same way. A lot of men, and a fewer women who are going to pair of with the top 25% of the men if not 10%. So you got to be in the top 25% either by looks or by the size of your wallet. Yes the wallet size wouldn't factor in so much on tinder, but wouldn't hurt either.
It seems a lot of work to finding the required fit though.
@Badhabits in your post you say "there are services ...". What do you mean by these services?
I haven't taken the dip yet and still on the fence. But thank you to all the contributors.
There is often more women than men on Seeking. In some regions, the ratio is close to three women to every man. But these figures really do not mean a lot. A lot of the women on Seeking are average looking at best and will probably never find a sugar arrangement (at least not to their satisfaction). A lot of guys do not have the means to sustain a long-term sugar relationships, many will attempt to scam or mislead people.I obviously don't have all the data points but I would hazard a guess the ratio of men/women on these sugaring websites is a little bit more balanced than say Tinder where the number of men simply outweigh the number of women.
In addition, the women who sign up for these sugaring websites all, more or less, have a financial need. I am not saying they will simply throw all their standards out the windows and go out with just about anyone who is willing to pay but the reality is they can't be too choosy either, like Tinder.
Questions for the sugaring pros here: I understand guys can create free profile. Is there a way to mention your Twitter/Snap/Instagram/whatever social media platform you use in your bio/description discreetly so that the ladies browsing your profile can contact you that way and you don't have to pony up the monthly subscription fee to send and receive messages?
Or these websites have algorithms/bots/scripts to scan and pick up those keywords and there is just no other way to contact the ladies, unless you pay the monthly fee?
I wonder, do you guys give any consolation money to girls if MnG did not go well for kinda chemistry reasons. I.e. if there was no fake pics/misrepresentation but rather you simply don't feel like you'd get your $$ worth of fun out of it.If there is good rapport and I liked the girl, I'll give her a $100 gift as a gesture of goodwill. It's not something I tell her in advance. If both parties want to move forward, than PPM starts when there is an agreed-upon arrangement in place.
All of my first official sugar dates have concluded with sex. No money was ever given up front, only once they are back at my condo.
If I liked my cock sucked by men I'd be giving money to menWhy are guys so stupid with their money and just giving it to women???
as we all realize, seeking cannot allow contact to happen unless the fee is paid. So no links in bio.Questions for the sugaring pros here: I understand guys can create free profile. Is there a way to mention your Twitter/Snap/Instagram/whatever social media platform you use in your bio/description discreetly so that the ladies browsing your profile can contact you that way and you don't have to pony up the monthly subscription fee to send and receive messages?
Or these websites have algorithms/bots/scripts to scan and pick up those keywords and there is just no other way to contact the ladies, unless you pay the monthly fee?
There's groups out there that trade information on SBs to expedite the process of meeting them or forgo doing all the work online so you can contact them directly.Looking at this discussion though, even seeking is kinda the same way. A lot of men, and a fewer women who are going to pair of with the top 25% of the men if not 10%. So you got to be in the top 25% either by looks or by the size of your wallet. Yes the wallet size wouldn't factor in so much on tinder, but wouldn't hurt either.
It seems a lot of work to finding the required fit though.
@Badhabits in your post you say "there are services ...". What do you mean by these services?
I haven't taken the dip yet and still on the fence. But thank you to all the contributors.
I usually bring $100 with me. Assuming I wasn't catfished and things went well, I typically give it to them at the end for their efforts. In most cases, it usually leads to an arrangement.I wonder, do you guys give any consolation money to girls if MnG did not go well for kinda chemistry reasons. I.e. if there was no fake pics/misrepresentation but rather you simply don't feel like you'd get your $$ worth of fun out of it.
but what if things don't go well i.e. she turned out to be someone who doesn't make your dick hard enough through no particular fault of her ownI usually bring $100 with me. Assuming I wasn't catfished and things went well, I typically give it to them at the end for their efforts. In most cases, it usually leads to an arrangement.
You raised a good point about this being a cost-prohibitive endeavour, after all is said and done.There is often more women than men on Seeking. In some regions, the ratio is close to three women to every man. But these figures really do not mean a lot. A lot of the women on Seeking are average looking at best and will probably never find a sugar arrangement (at least not to their satisfaction). A lot of guys do not have the means to sustain a long-term sugar relationships, many will attempt to scam or mislead people.
Each side experiences their own hurdles in finding an arrangement.
The women on Seeking are willing to make a trade, so intuitively they will date people they otherwise would not. They are still selective. Keep in mind that a lot of these young girls are very self-conscious. They may not be comfortable being in public with a man with a huge age-gap, with people looking at them. Their tolerance making out with unappealing men is going to be a lot lower than an escort.
Profiles go through an approval process and it's unlikely listing social media will get through.
The reality is that less than 9-percent of men in the Ottawa-Gatineau metropolitan area earn $100,000 or more. That figure is on the higher end for most cities in North America, which is largely due to the high concentration of well-paid, unionized government jobs. But how many people are actively seeking a sugar relationship, much less genuinely looking for something long-term?You raised a good point about this being a cost-prohibitive endeavour, after all is said and done.
If I remember what you wrote in your excellent long post on the first page correctly, each meet can range from $200 - $500. Assuming this is a weekly event (or bi-weekly), you will be looking at anywhere between $800 a month up to $2K. This may (or may not) include other expenses like dinner dates, shopping, potential trips. And presumably this is only for 1 sugar baby, it is entirely possible to have at least 1 more piece on the side.
This being a government town where I don't know too many public servants with that kind of disposable income, financial constraint can certainly be a roadblock to maintaining this lifestyle/hobby
There are promotion codes sent to emails/floating around that will help a bit with the subscription fees but you are right, if you are just looking for a wham, bam, thank you m'aam experience to relieve stress then SP/MA maybe a better choice.I joined seeking ....just to look around and I certainly think that its cheaper to just get a normal escort twice a month than make most of these ladies happy....not to mention the outrageous subscription fees... T think you'd have better luck getting a FWB type thing on FB dating....and its free