Is Harper talking a Carbon Tax in a round about way?? Hmmmm, election time is in the air and he's trying to appease the left wing. I wonder if he's going to contribute to CUPE and CUPW too??
http://www.albertaoilmagazine.com/2014/12/stephen-harper-changes-tune-carbon-pricing/
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ste...nts-only-half-the-story-critics-say-1.2878524
Carbon-pricing convert?
Now Harper says he'd be open to using a carbon-pricing system like Alberta's for the entire continent, a concept he's previously opposed.
"I think it’s a model on which you could, on which you could go broader," Harper said in Wednesday's interview.
"It's not a levy, it's a price. And there's a tech fund in which … [the] private sector makes investments."
Alberta requires big companies to reduce their energy intensity, in other words improve their energy efficiency, annually. If they don't, they pay into technology fund at $15 a tonne for carbon emissions.
David McLaughlin, an adviser at the University of Waterloo’s school of environment, says emissions continue to rise under Alberta's system of carbon pricing.
"The price of $15 a tonne is too low to actually get the emissions reductions we want from these big emitters. So it would not do the job of reducing emissions in Canada."
The prime minister also took credit for getting tough on coal.
"We are phasing out in Canada through regulations, we are phasing out the use of traditional dirty coal. It’s going to go to zero in the next 15 years or so," Harper said.
New federal coal regulations apply to new plants built after 2015. Existing plants built in the last 50 years are grandfathered, meaning they would have up to 2030 to close or introduce carbon capture and storage technology to reduce emissions.
Ontario's Environment Minister Glen Murray points out the province closed coal plants with no help from Ottawa.
"if the federal government wants to start taking credit for provincially funded initiatives, they could at least have the decency to make a commitment to support those initiatives in the future."
Harper's comments could be more about politics than policy — an attempt to soften his image on the environment in an election year when climate change is again becoming a hot political topic.
http://www.albertaoilmagazine.com/2014/12/stephen-harper-changes-tune-carbon-pricing/
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ste...nts-only-half-the-story-critics-say-1.2878524
Carbon-pricing convert?
Now Harper says he'd be open to using a carbon-pricing system like Alberta's for the entire continent, a concept he's previously opposed.
"I think it’s a model on which you could, on which you could go broader," Harper said in Wednesday's interview.
"It's not a levy, it's a price. And there's a tech fund in which … [the] private sector makes investments."
Alberta requires big companies to reduce their energy intensity, in other words improve their energy efficiency, annually. If they don't, they pay into technology fund at $15 a tonne for carbon emissions.
David McLaughlin, an adviser at the University of Waterloo’s school of environment, says emissions continue to rise under Alberta's system of carbon pricing.
"The price of $15 a tonne is too low to actually get the emissions reductions we want from these big emitters. So it would not do the job of reducing emissions in Canada."
The prime minister also took credit for getting tough on coal.
"We are phasing out in Canada through regulations, we are phasing out the use of traditional dirty coal. It’s going to go to zero in the next 15 years or so," Harper said.
New federal coal regulations apply to new plants built after 2015. Existing plants built in the last 50 years are grandfathered, meaning they would have up to 2030 to close or introduce carbon capture and storage technology to reduce emissions.
Ontario's Environment Minister Glen Murray points out the province closed coal plants with no help from Ottawa.
"if the federal government wants to start taking credit for provincially funded initiatives, they could at least have the decency to make a commitment to support those initiatives in the future."
Harper's comments could be more about politics than policy — an attempt to soften his image on the environment in an election year when climate change is again becoming a hot political topic.