How do you know he's not a hobbyist? It's not like he's gonna broadcast it to everyone that he is. He's a pop/rock star and I bet it is more likely than not that most pop/rock stars have seen SP's.unshavencuban said:As a huge Springsteen fanatic for 25+ years I take offense to that comment that he is a hobbyist,his songs are of the common man and everyday life,and as we all know being a hobbyist is 1 part of the common man's life.
The song itself(Reno) isn't that graphic really,that line is the only controversial 1 in the whole album/cd(Devils & Dust)
Bruce fanatic/unshavencuban![]()
I believe there are stories Bruce likes to kick back in strip clubs...unshavencuban said:As a huge Springsteen fanatic for 25+ years I take offense to that comment that he is a hobbyist,his songs are of the common man and everyday life,and as we all know being a hobbyist is 1 part of the common man's life.
The song itself(Reno) isn't that graphic really,that line is the only controversial 1 in the whole album/cd(Devils & Dust)
Bruce fanatic/unshavencuban![]()
Besides what Alien and subDave have written on the board, this may be one of the goofiest things ever. First, if you think that anybody is above being an hobbyist, then you should take a look in the mirror. Second, maybe he is, but who cares? Why would that make him less of a person? And why would you take such offence to him being a hobbyist? And lastly, how do you know he isn't a hobbyist? I mean, his songs are meant for the common man by the common man. Why would that preclude that he didn't hobby?unshavencuban said:As a huge Springsteen fanatic for 25+ years I take offense to that comment that he is a hobbyist,his songs are of the common man and everyday life,and as we all know being a hobbyist is 1 part of the common man's life.
The song itself(Reno) isn't that graphic really,that line is the only controversial 1 in the whole album/cd(Devils & Dust)
Bruce fanatic/unshavencuban![]()
The age old adage "You don't pay her for sex, you pay her to leave" holds true here. They want sex with no strings attached.C Dick said:I don't think even Paul Simon would have to pay for sex, let alone the Boss. What percentage of attractive women at a Springstein concert would not happily be picked out of the crowd and taken back to service him?
*high-fives Homonger*homonger said:IMO, hobbyists are just a little more resourceful and clever than non-hobbyists.
It's already been said, but paying for it does not mean you are necessarily unattractive or unworthy. With the amount that I hobby, I have to believe that!C Dick said:I don't think even Paul Simon would have to pay for sex, let alone the Boss. What percentage of attractive women at a Springstein concert would not happily be picked out of the crowd and taken back to service him?
Understood. But rock stars, athletes, movie stars (at least the ones that are male and straight), all have their down moments, I'm sure, and what if they desire some female company at that moment ? Men hobby for many reasons, but the most important reason is because they can. I would suggest celebrities are no different.C Dick said:I was not implying that if you pay you must be undesirable, just that being hugely famous and successful is very powerful when it comes to getting women on your own terms (e.g. go away after). It is true about Hugh Grant, though I think that rock stars tend to be a lot better organized at processing groupies than movie stars do.





