Something every Canadian should watch

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,971
5,606
113
I'll pass.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,971
5,606
113
lookingforitallthetime said:
I'm not surprised. You obviously have bigger issues to consider such as the transfat content in Danish bread.
If Canada adopted the danish rule for transfat content in food, about
2,500 canadians would be saved from dying of a heart attack every year.

Methink that is better than watching people killing each other.
 
Mar 19, 2006
8,767
0
0
danmand said:
If Canada adopted the danish rule for transfat content in food, about
2,500 canadians would be saved from dying of a heart attack every year.

Methink that is better than watching people killing each other.
War, like eating, can be a messy business.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,971
5,606
113
lookingforitallthetime said:
War, like eating, can be a messy business.
Fortunately, I have been able to limit the mess to eating. Both my grandfathers
were forced to be soldiers for a cause they hated, and they were not in favour of war.
That influenced me some.
 

someone

Active member
Jun 7, 2003
4,307
1
38
Earth
lookingforitallthetime said:
Especially those who deny the impact the Canadian military has had in forming the Canadian identity.

http://www.history.ca/ontv/titledetails.aspx?titleid=103246

I know I will be watching.
I heard about that. If I had cable I’d also watch it (I suspect one of the other channels will re-air it soon). I’ve always wondered to what extent Canada’s outlook on the world differs from Australia and New Zealand because the battle that started us thinking of ourselves as Canadian rather than British subjects was a great victory and their battle as a defeat (Likewise, with Newfoundland whose big WW1 battle was a defeat).
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,709
3
0
danmand said:
Both my grandfathers were forced to be soldiers for a cause they hated, and they were not in favour of war.
That's quite the damn statement. I've known plenty of veterans who were appalled by the bloodshed and destruction of war, and a fair number who had a cordial loathing for the military. But very few from the 1914 - 1960 generations who felt that “their war(s)” “was for a cause they hated.” I hasten to add that I'm not speaking of those conscripted into the Wehrmacht.
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,520
1
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
danmand said:
Fortunately, I have been able to limit the mess to eating. Both my grandfathers
were forced to be soldiers for a cause they hated, and they were not in favour of war.
That influenced me some.
Did you think less of your grand fathers for serving?
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,520
1
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
DonQuixote said:
Neither his gramps or any vet needs belittling.
We're not the ones that make the decisions.
We're the ones that have to live with the
consequences.
Don, my question for demand was what he thought. I dare say you are correct.
 
Mar 19, 2006
8,767
0
0
DonQuixote said:
Change 'messy' to 'evil' and I agree.
No need to be civil when dealing
with war.
I admit 'messy' was too flipant. Still, I think Patton summed war up best.

On a less serious note, If you find eating 'hell' or 'evil' I suggest you find a new restaurant. ;)
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,971
5,606
113
papasmerf said:
Did you think less of your grand fathers for serving?
They did not have any choice. The area I come from, was occupied by Germany from 1864 to 1920. My grandfathers hated the germans but were conscripted. If anything, the area I am from was more closely aligned with the british, and to fight on the german side was absurd for them. They tried as best they could to avoid fighting, in a soldier Sweik kind of way.

But my grandfather always told me that even the proper german soldiers would rather stay home and did not really want to fight. Nobody had high opinions of the generals.

DQ and Papa may be able to imagine to have to go to war on the enemy's side.
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,520
1
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
danmand said:
DQ and Papa may be able to imagine to have to go to war on the enemy's side.
I think I speak for Don when I say better to die then to spend a lifetime as a slave.

We would leave or die trying.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,709
3
0
danmand said:
They did not have any choice. The area I come from, was occupied by Germany from 1864 to 1920. My grandfathers hated the germans but were conscripted. If anything, the area I am from was more closely aligned with the british, and to fight on the german side was absurd for them. They tried as best they could to avoid fighting, in a soldier Sweik kind of way.

But my grandfather always told me that even the proper german soldiers would rather stay home and did not really want to fight. Nobody had high opinions of the generals.
It's a hell of a postion to be in.

I would have understood your post better on first read if it had been clear that you were not speaking of the Canadian Military.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,971
5,606
113
papasmerf said:
I think I speak for Don when I say better to die then to spend a lifetime as a slave.

We would leave or die trying.
Well, you would think so, wouldn't you, and about 60% of all men between 18 and 60 left for north america when the war was about to start. But in every family, someone had to stay behind to keep the claim to the land. The germans were trying their best to germanize the area by moving germans onto the land. If everybody had left, the area would have been german today.
A plebescite was held in 1920, and the area returned to Denmark, so you may say that it was worth it.
From what I understand, the "danish" soldiers caused a lot of trouble for the german army, I know especially one of my grandfathers story, and I don't think any of them shot at any british or french soldiers.

The experience thoroughly turned them off soldiering.
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,520
1
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
danmand said:
Well, you would think so, wouldn't you, and about 60% of all men between 18 and 60 left for north america when the war was about to start. But in every family, someone had to stay behind to keep the claim to the land. The germans were trying their best to germanize the area by moving germans onto the land. If everybody had left, the area would have been german today.
After WWII a plebescite was held, and the area returned to Denmark.

From what I understand, the "danish" soldiers caused a lot of trouble for the german army, I know especially one of my grandfathers story, and I don't think any of them shot at any british or french soldiers.

The experience thoroughly turned them off soldiering.
what hey had to.

Your grand father deserve respect for doing
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,709
3
0
lookingforitallthetime said:
I admit 'messy' was too flipant. Still, I think Patton summed war up best.
General William T. Sherman, USA put it best in an address in 1879 to a military secondary school "There is many a boy here today who looks on war as all glory, but boys, it is all hell."
 
Mar 19, 2006
8,767
0
0
Aardvark154 said:
General William T. Sherman, USA put it best in an address in 1879 to a military secondary school "There is many a boy here today who looks on war as all glory, but boys, it is all hell."
Yes, my mistake. Thank you. It was Sherman who said "War is hell", not Patton.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,466
6,990
113
Aardvark154 said:
That's quite the damn statement. I've known plenty of veterans who were appalled by the bloodshed and destruction of war, and a fair number who had a cordial loathing for the military. But very few from the 1914 - 1960 generations who felt that “their war(s)” “was for a cause they hated.” I hasten to add that I'm not speaking of those conscripted into the Wehrmacht.
Many Francophones and the Irish in Canada weren't that keen about fighting for King and Empire.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,709
3
0
basketcase said:
Many Francophones and the Irish in Canada weren't that keen about fighting for King and Empire.
True enough. Than again a great many did.

Also in the case of Québec particularly in the Second World War I'm not sure how much of that was resentment for "a cause they hated,” and how much was about the philosophical concept of conscription.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts