This is what the NIFC says about the US (not global) data set you are trying to cherry pick as the sole source for your argument about global forest fires.there is a date stamp indicating the data was downloaded as publicly available data on October 24, 2020 , before pre 1983 was disappeared.
but according to Frankfooter the public is not permitted to view publicly available data (do you smell authoritarianism with hints of communism ?)
it does not say the data is faulty
it says this chart may be misleading even though the NIFC includes all of this yearly data in one table (as of October 24, 2020 )
it says nothing about faulty data . they changed their reporting procedures. that requires an asterisk and a footnote, not a disappearance
You keep posting the data they say is not official. You are not supposed to use this data.
This is an argument about global temps and you are still using one country's cherry picked rough data as your so argument becomes bullshit on two points:
1) Using cherry picked data from one country in a global debate
2) Using faulty data that is not sanctioned
This is the rambling of an old person.???
I said nothing about tony Haller's graphics representing current and global temps.
i did mention the messed up surface temp record, but that was a separate problem and a separate part of the post
so it was propaganda directed towards kids that brain washed you, ...... I see... yikes !
the actual physics of our non-linear, coupled , chaotic and dynamic climate system is a lot more more complicated than shown in your favourite cartoon
dropping out of high school was not a good plan, educating yourself via cartoons is not a good plan either
do you mean like the moron who intentionally disappeared 70 odd years of forest fire data ?
now you see it, now you don't ?
Let me know if you have something relevant to say.
1) The US underwent drought during the 30's and through the great depression. It was a local, US event. The Grapes of Wrath...Explain this:
the 1999 us temp anomaly is lower than the 1932 anomaly as reported in 1999
however two decades later in 2019, the 1999 us temp anomaly is higher than the 1932 anomaly.
2) The fucking planet has warmed almost 1.5ºC, so of course temps are higher now
3) You're still intentionally using one country's data in a global argument, that is dishonest.
US data
U.S. average temperature by year 1895-2023 | Statista
The annual average temperature in the U.S. has seen an upward trend since 1895, having increased by 1.02 degrees Fahrenheit in 2023 from the previous year.
www.statista.com
Global land temperature anomalies 2023 | Statista
Since 1880, the annual global land temperature anomaly has fluctuated, showing an overall upward tendency.
www.statista.com
Stop being a moron and use global data in this discussion about global temperatures.
More incoherent ramblings of an old person.the physical laws of nature do not change historical temperatures
humans can change data
did Tony Haller change the NASA data?
or was it a climate activist .......masquerading as a scientist
it would not be the first time they have diddled the data
Michael Manns broken Hockey Stick
extreme weather events >>> "low confidence'
"Hide the decline"
NIFC
You keep trying to assassinate the character of the 99.9% of scientists who back the findings of the IPCC.
You are an old kook who couldn't even follow the NASA kids page on the greenhouse effect.